Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERSESUAIAN SUBJEK-VERBA BAHASA BIAK DAN BAHASA TERNATE (SEBUAH KAJIAN DESKRIPTIF-KOMPARATIF) Simin Althur
Linguistika: Buletin Ilmiah Program Magister Linguistik Universitas Udayana Vol 18 (2011): March 2011
Publisher : Program Magister Linguistik Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (89.084 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article is a description-comparative subject-verb concord between Biak language (one of the AN languages in Papua) and Ternate language (one of NAN language) in North Maluku. It is estimated that the subject-verb agreement of Biak language and the Ternate language is linguistic evidence that a common feature of the “lingual-fossil”, not as a result of the influence due to the historical relations of the past. Thus this paper refused Biak language as the Austronesian. Biak language is a member of NAN languages (Papuan Phylum) that only gets the effect of AN languages, rather than vice versa. Previous classification which considers the Biak language is a Austronesian language is a misclassification. ABSTRAK Artikel ini adalah sebuah deskripsi-komparatif persesuaian subjek-verba antara bahasa Biak (salah satu bahasa AN di Papua) dan bahasa Ternate (salah satu bahasa NAN) di Maluku Utara. Diperkirakan persesuaian subjek-verba bahasa Biak dan bahasa Ternate adalah evidensi linguistik yang merupakan “fosil-lingual” ciri bersama keserumpunan, bukan sebagai pengaruh akibat adanya relasi historis masa silam. Dengan demikian tulisan ini menolak bahasa Biak sebgai bahasa Austronesia. Bahasa Biak adalah anggota kelompok bahasa-bahasa NAN (Filum Papua) yang hanya mendapat pengaruh dari bahasa AN, bukan sebaliknya. Klasifikasi sebelumnya yang menganggap bahasa Biak sebagai bahasa Austronesia adalah misklasifikasi.
Analisis Konstraktif Fonologi Bahasa Indonesia dengan Bahasa Mee sebagai Pendekatan Alternatif Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Tingkat SD di Kabupaten Nabire dan Paniai Simin Althur
Kibas Cenderawasih : Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Vol. 8 No. 1 (2012)
Publisher : Balai Bahasa Provinsi Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1370.453 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/kc.v8i1.81

Abstract

This article is aqualitative research using contrastivea nalysis method for contrasting the Indonesian phonological system with that of the Mee language phonology, spoken by the Mee tribe in the regencies of Nabire and Paniai Papua, in order tofind similarities and differences inthetwo phonological systems. Both have the same sub system in (1)vowels/a/, /i/, /u/, /e/, /o/and rising diphtongs/ay/and/aw/. (2) Both have the same consonant subsystem in (a)bilabial/p/, /b/, /m/, /w/; (b) alveolar/t/, /d/,/n/; (c) velar/k/and/g/;and  (d)palatal/y/. (3) Both have these identical phonemes/w/ and /y/ in the initial and medial positions.(4) Both have these syllable patterns V and CV. Differences are observed in(1)the vowel/ə/,which is only found in the Indonesian system.(2) The diphthongs/ey/, /ew/, and/ow/ which are only found in the Mee language. (3) these phonemes: labiodental-fricative/f/; alveolar-fricative/s/and/z/; alveolar-vibrating /r/; lateral/l/; palatal/c/and/j/; lamino-palatal fricative/š/or/sy/;palatal-nasal /ň/or/ny/; velar-fricative/x/or/kh/; velarnasal/ŋ/or/ng/; glottal-fricative /h/ which are only found in the Indonesian system. (4) theconsonants in the Indonesian system can be generally distributed initially, medially and finally,except for/c/, /j/,/g/, /z/, /w/, /y/, /ň/which cannot be found finally, and the phoneme/ŋ/cannot be found initially. (5) Oonly the Indonesian system has consonant clusters, and (6) the Indonesian system has the following syllable patterns VC, CVC, CCV, CCVC, CCCV, CCCVC, CCVCC, CVCC while the Mee system only has these patterns V and CV.