Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika
Husein Alyafie
STAIN Datokarama Palu, Jl. Diponegoro 23 Palu
Arts Humanities

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
FAZLUR RAHMAN DAN METODE IJTIHADNYA: Telaah Sekitar Pembaruan Hukum Islam Alyafie, Husein
Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Vol 6, No 1 (2009): Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In his monumental work, Islamic Methodology in History, Fazlur Rahman proposed two causes of failure of using ijtihâd as a method in interpreting Islamic law among classical Islamic law scholars. Firstly, there is an unharmonious relationship between “sunnah-ijma’-ijtihâd; secondly, there is a burden of majority doctrine theology  towards the law. Both causalities are related each other. Fazlur Rahman tried to show the unharmonious between “sunnah-ijma’-ijtihâd” as stated in usûl fiqh. In those unharmonious relationship, ijtihâd is defeated by ijma’. In fact, ijtihâd is regarded as a means to direct and to form ijma’. Due to the ineffective position of ijtihâd, it is not possible to form new ijma’.Kata Kunci: Fazlur Rahman, metode ijtihad, pembaruan hukum Islam, sunah, ijmak
FAZLUR RAHMAN DAN METODE IJTIHADNYA: Telaah Sekitar Pembaruan Hukum Islam Alyafie, Husein
Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Vol 6 No 1 (2009): Studi Keislaman
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (243.305 KB) | DOI: 10.24239/jsi.v6i1.117.29-52

Abstract

In his monumental work, Islamic Methodology in History, Fazlur Rahman proposed two causes of failure of using ijtihâd as a method in interpreting Islamic law among classical Islamic law scholars. Firstly, there is an unharmonious relationship between “sunnah-ijma’-ijtihâd; secondly, there is a burden of majority doctrine theology  towards the law. Both causalities are related each other. Fazlur Rahman tried to show the unharmonious between “sunnah-ijma’-ijtihâd” as stated in usûl fiqh. In those unharmonious relationship, ijtihâd is defeated by ijma’. In fact, ijtihâd is regarded as a means to direct and to form ijma’. Due to the ineffective position of ijtihâd, it is not possible to form new ijma’.Kata Kunci: Fazlur Rahman, metode ijtihad, pembaruan hukum Islam, sunah, ijmak
Co-Authors