Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

YURISDIKSI PENGADILAN PIDANA INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KEJAHATAN TERORISME Mustika, I Komang Sanju Bayu
Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Vol 4, No 3 (2021): November, Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jatayu.v4i3.43102

Abstract

Dalam dinamika pencegahan dan pemberantasan kejahatan terorisme, masyarakat internasional terutama kalangan negara-negara anggota PBB hingga kini masih mengalami kesulitan dalam menangin kasus-kasus mengenai terorisme. Kejahatan terorisme dapat digolongkan sebagai kejahatan transnasional maupun sebagai kejahatan internasional. Kendati terkualifikasi kejahatan internasional, penegakan hukumnya tetap merupakan yurisdiksi nasional. Sesuai dengan asas komplementer, apabila negara tidak mau, atau enggan, atau tidak mampu melaksanakan yurisdiksi maka akan diambil alih menjadi yurisdiksi internasional, dalam hal ini akan menjadi yurisdiksi PPI.
The validity of nominee agreements on the ownership of shares from a business law and human rights perspective Mustika, I Komang Sanju Bayu
The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): December: Law, Politic and Sosiology
Publisher : Trigin Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/ijopsor.v13i3.312

Abstract

This study analyzes the validity of nominee agreements in share ownership under Indonesian investment law through the perspective of human rights theory. Using a normative juridical method, the research examines how such agreements, often used to conceal foreign ownership, relate to national legal norms and human rights principles, including economic rights, equality before the law, and the right to national self-determination. The study draws on primary legal sources such as the Investment Law (Law No. 25 of 2007), the Company Law (Law No. 40 of 2007), and constitutional provisions under the 1945 Constitution, along with relevant international human rights instruments. The findings demonstrate that nominee agreements violate Article 33 of the Investment Law and contradict Indonesia’s constitutional and human rights commitments. These agreements not only obscure ownership transparency but also undermine economic justice and the collective rights of Indonesian citizens to control national resources. The research concludes that maintaining the prohibition of nominee arrangements is essential to preserving legal certainty, national sovereignty, and the ethical integrity of foreign investment practices. The alignment of investment law with human rights principles strengthens Indonesia’s commitment to fair, transparent, and sustainable economic governance.