Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Perbedaan Suhu dan Resistansi pada Termistor PTC dengan Menggunakan Media Dingin dan Media Panas Nurhayati, Nurhayati; Safira, Widya; Lahuddin, Rahmad
Phi: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Terapan Vol 7, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/p-jpft.v7i1.11945

Abstract

Artikel ini merupakan eksperimen pengunaan Termistor sebagai alat sensor suhu. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk menganalisis pengaruh media panas maupun dingin terhadap perubahan suhu dan resistansi pada Termistor PTC. Metode yang digunakan adalah eksperimen. Hasil eksperimen menunjukkan bahwa pada media dingin maka nilai resitansinya semakin menurun, sedangkan pada media panas maka nilai resistansinya semakin meningkat. Jadi dapat disimpulkan bahwa sensor PTC memiliki tingkat sensitivitas yang tinggi yang akan berubah nilai tahanannya jika terdapat perubahan suhu yang mengenainya.
ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' DECISIONS ON CRIMINAL SANCTIONS FOR ILLEGAL FISHING RECIDIVISTS: (Study of Sinabang District Court Decision Number 7/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Snb jo 28/Pid.Sus/2016/PN Snb) Safira, Widya; Sandela, Ilka
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v2i2.616

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the considerations and reasons of judges when determining the same punishment for recidivist offenders engaged in illegal fishing, as well as the factors that contribute to the ineffectiveness of sanctions imposed on illegal fishing perpetrators. Recidivism is regulated in Articles 486, 487, and 488 of the Criminal Code, which stipulate that the penalty for repeat offenses should be increased by 1/3 of the previous sentence. However, in decision number 7/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Snb jo 28/Pid.Sus/2016/PN Snb, the judge imposed the same sentence of 3 years in prison for the defendant, without increasing the sentence as required. The research utilizes normative juridical and empirical juridical methods. The findings indicate that, in determining sanctions, judges consider aggravating and mitigating circumstances for the defendant. Their decisions are not solely based on formal evidence, but also rely on the judge's conviction. The judge's reasoning for imposing the same sanctions in this case was due to the fact that the defendant did not own the object of the crime, demonstrated good behavior during the trial, and was the breadwinner of the family. Factors contributing to the ineffectiveness of the imposed sanctions include lenient penalties, factors related to law enforcement, environmental considerations, and socio-economic factors.