Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik
Maulida, Faiz
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Afiliasi Politik Media dalam Framing Pemberitaan Debat Pilpres 2024 pada Asumsi.co dan Republika.co.id Maulida, Faiz
Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik Vol 7, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik
Publisher : Faculty of Da'wa and Communications Sciences

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jsj.v7i1.42859

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana framing pemberitaan debat Pilpres 2024 pada dua media massa, yaitu asumsi.co dan republika.co.id. Kedua media tersebut diketahui memiliki afiliasi politik. CEO sekaligus Founder asumsi.co, Pangeran Siahaan, terlibat sebagai Juru Bicara Tim Pemenangan Nasional (TPN) pasangan Ganjar-Mahfud. Sementara itu, republika.co.id merupakan media yang berada dibawah naungan PT Mahaka Media Tbk yang didirikan oleh Erick Thohir, Chief di Tim Kemenangan Nasional  (TKN) Fanta, salah satu unsur TKN Prabowo-Gibran. Dengan menggunakan metode analisis framing Robert N. Entman, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi empat elemen framing: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, dan treatment recommendation. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengaplikasikan dua dimensi besar dari Entman, yaitu seleksi isu dan penonjolan aspek tertentu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan dalam cara kedua media membingkai pemberitaan terkait pasangan calon presiden dan wakil presiden. Asumsi.co konsisten membingkai debat Pilpres 2024 dengan fokus pada citra positif pasangan Ganjar Pranowo-Mahfud MD, menonjolkan performa matang dan penguasaan materi, sementara republika.co.id lebih variatif, menyoroti aspek personalitas, gestur fisik, dan retorika, dengan fokus utama pada citra positif Prabowo Subianto sebagai pemimpin tegas dan berpengalaman, serta sorotan tambahan pada Gibran Rakabuming Raka, sembari lebih kritis terhadap Anies Baswedan terutama terkait etika politik.
Afiliasi Politik Media dalam Framing Pemberitaan Debat Pilpres 2024 pada Asumsi.co dan Republika.co.id Maulida, Faiz
Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Studi Jurnalistik
Publisher : Faculty of Da'wa and Communications Sciences

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jsj.v7i1.42859

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how the 2024 Presidential Election debate news is framed in two mass media, namely Assumption.co and Republika.co.id. Both media are known to have political affiliations. The CEO and Founder of Assumption.co, Pangeran Siahaan, was involved as the Spokesperson for the National Winning Team (TPN) for the Ganjar-Mahfud pair. Meanwhile, Republika.co.id is a media under the auspices of PT Mahaka Media Tbk, which was founded by Erick Thohir, Chief of the National Winning Team (TKN) Fanta, one of the elements of the Prabowo-Gibran TKN. Using Robert N. Entman's framing analysis method, this study examines four key elements of framing: defining problems, diagnosing causes, making moral judgments, and recommending treatments. In addition, this study also applies two major dimensions from Entman, namely issue selection and highlighting certain aspects. The study's results reveal differences in how the two media frame news related to the presidential and vice presidential candidate pairs. Asumsi.co consistently frames the 2024 presidential debate by focusing on the positive image of the Ganjar Pranowo-Mahfud MD pair, highlighting their mature performance and mastery of the material, while republika.co.id is more varied, highlighting aspects of personality, physical gestures, and rhetoric, with a primary focus on the positive image of Prabowo Subianto as a firm and experienced leader, as well as additional highlights on Gibran Rakabuming Raka, while being more critical of Anies Baswedan, especially regarding political ethics. Keywords: Political affiliation, framing, mass media, presidential debate, framing analysis
Co-Authors