Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.547
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Jurnal Preferensi Hukum (JPH)
I Putu Gede Seputra
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Preferensi Hukum (JPH)

 1 
Sanksi Pidana terhadap Para Pemasang dan Promosi Iklan Bermuatan Konten Judi Online Pande Putu Rastika Paramartha; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; I Putu Gede Seputra
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (198.45 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jph.2.1.3062.156-160

Abstract

Online gambling is a phenomenon that cannot be denied and is found in the community. In promoting online gambling, site owners usually advertise their online gambling sites to internet. Because this is the dissemination and development of online gambling sites is growing rapidly. From the above background, the problem can be formulated as follows: How is the regulation of criminal sanctions against the installer and promotion of online gambling advertisements and What are the criminal sanctions against the installer and promotion of online gambling advertisements The research method used is the type of normative research that is the type of research by conducting its assessment based on legal materials from the prevailing literature and legislation. The legal arrangements for advertisers and promotions of online gambling are regulated in Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions in article 27 paragraph 2 which reads: "Everyone intentionally and without rights distributes and or electronic documents containing gambling "Criminal sanctions against advertising and promotion of online gambling advertisements are regulated in article 45 paragraph 1 of Act Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, namely criminal penalties with a maximum of 6 (six) years and or a maximum fine of Rp.1,000,000,000.00 . (one billion rupiah).
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Waitress di Cafe Katulebo Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan Ida Bagus Alit Segara Gita; Nella Hasibuan Oleary; I Putu Gede Seputra
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (194.723 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jph.1.1.1977.222-227

Abstract

Waitress is usually tasked with pouring the drink that visitors ordered into a glass and accompanying visitors to sing while in the cafe. In labor law legal protection is provided in the form of legal protection in the field of job security where both in a relatively short or long time will be safe and there is a guarantee of safety for workers. In the case of liability to workers in the event of a work accident while carrying out their obligations at work the employer will bear the burden Arising materially by providingreimbursement for costs incurred due to work accidents based on the description the author gets the title Legal Protection Against Waitress at Katulebo Cafe Based on the Law Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Employment. The aims of this study is to find out the legal protection provided by Katulebo cafe to waitresses according to Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Employment and to find out the responsibility of Katulebo cafe for waitresses in work accidents. In practice the implementation of legal protection provided by the cafe to the waitress is only through a written agreement containing the regulations and what rights are obtained by the waitress. The form of responsibility given by the cafe to the waitress only provides a first-aid kit and compensation when work accidents occur. The writing method used is empirical legal research.
Asas Keadilan Pemungutan Pajak dalam Peraturan Pemerintah No 23 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pajak Penghasilan Made Dwi Surya Suasa; I Made Arjaya; I Putu Gede Seputra
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (191.011 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jph.2.1.3042.6-10

Abstract

In mid-2018, the government issued new regulations in the field of taxation which is expected to be an increadible impact for tax revenues. The rules are set out in the Government Regulation Number 23 Year 2018 regarding Income Tax on Income Effort Received or Provided Taxpayers Who Have Specific Gross Distribution (Government Regulation Number 23 Year 2018). Various responses from the community came after the release of the Government Regulation. One is the aspect of fairness in the taxation of income that seems to be ruled out with the advent of the Government Regulation. The principle of fairness in income tax collection adheres to vertical equity, the higher the income (net) earned or received by the higher taxes that are owed. Vertical Justice not accommodated in the regulation is to make the basis for the calculation of gross turnover tax payable. As a result, taxpayers who have the same gross turnover is considered to have the same economic additional capabilities. Estuary of the principle of vertical equity is a theory that emphasizes the style bear minimum cost of living.
Penerapan Asas Hakim Aktif (Dominus Litis) dalam Persidangan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Kasus Putusan No.1/G/2017/PTUN.DPS.) Ni Komang Dewi Novita Indriyani Weda; I Made Arjaya; I Putu Gede Seputra
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (192.04 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jph.2.1.3048.27-32

Abstract

In the judiciary the Judicial State Administration plays a more active role in the trial process in order to obtain material truth. The activist of the judge is intended to compensate for the unequal position of the parties, namely the Defendant is an entity or official of the State administration and the Plaintiff is an individual or civil legal entity. In this research there are two main problems, namely (1) how is the Procedure for Making a Gathering in the State Administrative Court? (2) How is the application of the principle of active judge (dominus litis) in the stage of proof at the trial? The research method used is normative legal research with a legal approach.
Co-Authors Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Dynna Madina Karuniawan Fika Pratiwi Gede Krisna Adi Putra I Gede Wardana Oka Sastra Wiguna I Ketut Sukadana I Made Arjaya I Nyoman Putu Budiartha Ida Bagus Alit Segara Gita Made Dwi Surya Suasa Nella Hasibuan Oleary Ni Kadek Tisna Aristya Dewi Ni Ketut Krismanika Ni Komang Dewi Novita Indriyani Weda Pande Putu Rastika Paramartha Pusaka, Semerdanta Putu Suryani .