Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum bagi Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Angkutan Udara Priscila; Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati; I Ketut Sukadana
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (198.605 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jph.2.1.3063.161-165

Abstract

Transportation is currently divided into three types, namely land transportation, sea transportation and air transportation. Nowadays, many people prefer to use air transportation since air transportation can travel long distances in a relatively shorter time. However, it is not infrequently for airlines to cause losses to consumers, especially to people with disabilities. Where as fact people with disabilities should get special treatment. Therefore, these problems can be examined as follows: 1) how is the legal protection for people with disabilities in the positive law in Indonesia? 2) What is the regulation of the rights of consumers with disabilities as airplane passengers? This presentation used normative research methods to find whether there are legal rules according to legal norms or not, whether there are norms in the form of orders or prohibitions in accordance with legal principles or not and whether one’s actions are in accordance with legal norms or not by using a legal and conceptual approach. This research required a source of secondary legal material as the main legal material. People with disabilities have the right to receive special services and facilities while at an airport or aircraft. The government has made legislation as a form of legal protection for people with disabilities. Nevertheless, the government must be more assertive in order to avoid discrimination against people with disabilities. Furthermore, it is not only the government that must provide legal protection for people with disabilities but also the community. The community must change the mindset about people with disabilities who are considered unable to do anything, and they must help people with disabilities to get equal treatment before the law.
Penerapan Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Hutang Piutang di Pengadilan Negeri Gianyar Putri Anggun Puspasari; Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati; Desak Gede Dwi Arini
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (202.155 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jph.2.1.3065.182-187

Abstract

Mediation is an alternative form of dispute resolution. Mediation has grown and developed, running fast, the desire of humans or the community to resolve disputes quickly, and satisfying both parties to the dispute, According to PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning Procedure for Mediation in the Court determining that Mediation is a way to settle disputes peacefully, quickly, right, and effective, can open wider access to the parties to the dispute to obtain a settlement of the case, and get a sense of justice. Accounts payable is an agreement that creates rights and obligations between creditors and debtors who are reciprocal. Accounts payable is regulated in Chapter Thirteenth of the Third Book of the Civil Code, in Article 1754 of the Civil Code. The problem is how is the application of mediation in resolving disputes over debt defaults in the Gianyar District Court? And what are the factors that influence the success of mediation in the Gianyar District Court? The research used is empirical legal research, which is looking at society in the real sense. And the problem approach used is the approach of cases in the Gianyar District Court. The conclusion obtained from this study is that the application of mediation in the Gianyar District Court is in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016, and the factors that hinder the mediation process in the Gianyar District Court, namely both litigants do not come in the mediation process so the mediation process failed.