Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pandangan Imam Mazhab Terhadap Wali Bagi Janda Relvansinya Dengan Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia; Studi Komparatif Muammar Mahdi; Irfan Lewa
Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.23237

Abstract

This study aims to find out about the views of the Imam Madhhab towards Guardians for Widows with the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia (Comparative Study). The type of research used is a literature study (Library Research), the object in this research is the View of the Imam Madhhab towards Guardians for Widows in Relation to the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia (Comparative Study) which is based on the Qur'an and Hadith. Where guardianship is part of Islamic law which is one of the pillars in marriage. In the description, there are differences of opinion among the mujtahids regarding guardianship as a pillar of marriage. There are several things that are considered in guardianship, because the existence of a marriage guardian is a pillar that determines the validity of a marriage, several conditions must be met for a marriage guardian. This research has implications for better understanding how Islamic law regulates marriage with the presence of a marriage guardian through authentic verses and hadiths. and To minimize people who do not know about Guardians for Widowed Women in Marriage. And to explain how the views of the Imam Madhhab towards guardians for widows are related to the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia (Comparative Study).
Konsep Adil dalam Poligami Perspektif Muhammad Quraish Shihab dan Amina Wadud Natriani; Irfan Lewa
Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/shautuna.vi.23820

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the differences and similarities between Muhammad Quraih Shihab and Aminah Wadud in terms of fair application in polygamy, namely M. Quraish Shibab, argues that polygamy is neither a recommendation nor an obligation to practice polygamy, but an alternative to resolve family problems. Meanwhile, Amina Wadud's opinion about polygamy is not allowed because the reasons that have been believed so far have never been found in the Qur'an. Thus, an important point that can be drawn from Amina Wadud's thinking is an attempt to dismantle old thoughts and old myths built by patriarchal culture. This research is a library research (Library Research). The approach used is descriptive-comparative. Techniques in analyzing data deductively, namely the pattern of studies discussed and studied are general-specific.