Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ARBITRASE: JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ACCOUNTING International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Sudjai
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penghargaan vs Hukuman, Pengukuran Dampak terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Sudjai; Didit Darmawan
ARBITRASE: Journal of Economics and Accounting Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): March 2022
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/arbitrase.v2i3.339

Abstract

The terms of the company's progress must include elements of quality human resources. This is a demand for companies to continue to develop human resources effectively. In the management concept, rewards and punishments aim to improve work behavior and improve employee performance. This study intends to observe the impact of rewards and punishments on employee performance. Research at an expedition company in Surabaya. There are employees on duty in the office and in the field. There are 119 employees. Sampling was done by census. Data collection with the help of a questionnaire. Regression is an analytical tool using SPSS. Rewards and punishments play a significant role in shaping employee performance. The better the reward and punishment policy, the better the employee's performance. These results have implications for management and company leaders to improve work discipline and employee performance
The Role of Registered Certificate (SKT) as an Instrument of Legal Protection in Indonesian Tax Administration Muchamad Catur Rizky; Sudjai; Didit Darmawan
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 7 No. 3: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i3.8108

Abstract

This study provides a normative legal analysis of the role and challenges of the Certificate of Registration (Surat Keterangan Terdaftar or SKT) as a fundamental legal instrument in Indonesia’s tax administration system. The SKT serves not only as proof of legal authority but also marks the commencement of a taxpayer’s formal tax obligations, whether for individuals or legal entities. Employing a regulatory review approach combined with scholarly literature and relevant legal doctrines, the study reveals that although the SKT is designed to uphold the principle of legality and strengthen the administrative validity of taxation, several practical issues persist. These include inconsistent interpretations, inefficient bureaucratic procedures, and the need for adaptation to digital systems and inter-agency data integration. Such challenges can lead to miscommunication, administrative oversight, and legal vulnerabilities for both taxpayers and tax authorities. To address these concerns, the study recommends regulatory harmonization, enhanced taxpayer education, stronger oversight mechanisms, and improved data verification and security systems. Streamlining administrative procedures and conducting periodic evaluations are essential to reinforce the SKT as a tool for legal protection and certainty within the national tax framework. These findings aim to offer both theoretical insight and practical recommendations for advancing tax law and improving fiscal administrative governance in Indonesia towards a more accountable and equitable system.
Restorative Justice dalam Sengketa Ketenagakerjaan: Alternatif Penyelesaian di Luar Litigasi Atmari; Sudjai
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/jjd6tc87

Abstract

The settlement of labor disputes in Indonesia continues to be dominated by formal, procedural, and adversarial mechanisms. Although various dispute resolution avenues are available ranging from bipartite negotiations and mediation to litigation these mechanisms have not effectively produced substantively fair outcomes nor sustained industrial relations. This limitation reveals a structural weakness in the existing legal framework, which prioritizes procedural certainty over relational justice. This study aims to examine the normative construction of labor dispute resolution within the Indonesian legal system, assess the conceptual relevance of restorative justice in industrial relations, and formulate a reconstructed dispute resolution model grounded in restorative principles. The research employs a normative legal method using statute and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate a normative gap in accommodating restorative justice within the current legal framework, particularly under Law Number 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement. Conceptually, restorative justice aligns with the continuous and interdependent nature of employment relations by emphasizing dialogue, participation, and relational recovery. This study concludes that the existing system fails to accommodate restorative values, thereby necessitating a reconstruction of legal norms. It recommends integrating restorative principles into dispute resolution mechanisms, strengthening mediator roles, and promoting a paradigm shift toward dialogical and participatory justice.
Co-Authors Atmari Didit Darmawan Muchamad Catur Rizky