Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani
Ida Melati Atasani
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KAJIAN TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP HAK-HAK PEREMPUAN BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 IDA MELATI ATASANI
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): PRAKTIK DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46601/juridicaugr.v5i2.253

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out whether the Judge's obligations according to Perma No. 3 of 2007 in terms of adjudicating women's cases in conflict with the law in the case of the Application for Isbat Marriage and Divorce, Complaining Decision No.495/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sel. and to find out how the Judge considered in Decision No. 495/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sel Against Women's Rights in conflict with the law. The approach methods used are conceptual, statutory and case approaches. Types of normative juridical research. Based on the research results, the obligations of judges according to Perma No. 3 of 2017, when judging women who are in conflict with the law, judges must be based on the principles of dignity, non-discrimination, gender equality, justice, benefit and legal certainty
KAJIAN TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP HAK-HAK PEREMPUAN BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 IDA MELATI ATASANI
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): PRAKTIK DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46601/juridicaugr.v5i2.253

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out whether the Judge's obligations according to Perma No. 3 of 2007 in terms of adjudicating women's cases in conflict with the law in the case of the Application for Isbat Marriage and Divorce, Complaining Decision No.495/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sel. and to find out how the Judge considered in Decision No. 495/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Sel Against Women's Rights in conflict with the law. The approach methods used are conceptual, statutory and case approaches. Types of normative juridical research. Based on the research results, the obligations of judges according to Perma No. 3 of 2017, when judging women who are in conflict with the law, judges must be based on the principles of dignity, non-discrimination, gender equality, justice, benefit and legal certainty
Co-Authors