Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

URBAN MILLENNIAL: ANALYSIS OF URBAN SOCIO-SPATIAL POLICY FOR 'GEN-Y' IN INDONESIA Agus Mauluddin
JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial Vol 1 No 1 (2019): JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial
Publisher : CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51486/jbo.v1i1.2

Abstract

By 2050 about 70% of the world's population will live in cities. Now it is around 54%. In Indonesia, for example, BPS noted that the proportion of Indonesia's population living in urban areas was 49% in 2010 and in 2018 it was around 55%. Interestingly, in 2020 the percentage of the population living in urban areas will be dominated by the millennial generation (in the age range of 20-40 years), who are in fact of the productive age. This trend is inseparable from the urbanization factor (the process of becoming urban). With a literature study: reviews of various international and national journals, as well as literature sources for books and documents, this study argues the need for an urban socio-spatial policy in Indonesia that can adjust urban functions from the response to potential demographic changes that change naturally in society. Urban spatial planning must adjust to the conditions of the urban population, which is dominated by millennial generations. This generation will be an opportunity or vice versa to become a challenge and even a threat to Indonesia's progress in the future.
DILEMA AGAMA DAN PANCASILA DI RUANG PUBLIK INDONESIA Agus Mauluddin
JISPO : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 8, No 2 (2018): JISPO Vol 8 No 2 2018
Publisher : Centre for Asian Social Science Research (CASSR), FISIP, UIN Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jispo.v8i2.3796

Abstract

This paper aims to challenge his studies (Bonotti and Seglow, 2017; Eiedat,2017; Fenton, 2016; Kaul, 2017; Kraidy and Krikorian, 2017; Nachi, 2016), which see religion and public sphere, but minus the context of Pancasila ideology. And perfecting his study Asrori (2016) who saw religion-in this case religious education in the context of the Pancasila ideology, but minus the study of public sphere in his study. Thus, this paper seeks to synthesize the position of religion in public sphere of Indonesia which has the ideology of Pancasila, and what is the policy alternative of the religious dilemma that is "brought" into public sphere of Indonesia? By using a qualitative approach, the library research method with a review of various international and national journal articles, and book reviews, this study produces at least two important findings, namely, first, religion and the state cannot be dichotomized in the ideology of Pancasila. Freedom of expressing religiosity in the public sphere becomes an embedded principle in the ideology of the Pancasila. Its implications for religious freedom in the public sphere are absolutely regulated fairly and wisely based on the principles of Pancasila. Secondly, the State and "internal" Religion needs to synergize in building freedom of expression in the public sphere; every religion in expressing its religiosity in the public sphere needs to pay attention to universal values. That is, "language" religion expressed in public sphere must have a "universal framework" that can be accepted by other citizens