Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Factors that affect Fraudulent Financial Reporting Kharissa Setiawan; Ita Trisnawati
Media Bisnis Vol 14 No 2 (2022): Media Bisnis
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34208/mb.v14i2.1666

Abstract

The objective of this research is to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of factors that can affect fraudulent financial reporting. Those factors are financial targets, financial stability, external pressure, institutional ownership, number of audit committee members, ineffective monitoring, nature of industry, external auditor quality, the change of auditor, auditor’s opinion, change of directors, proportion of independent commissioner, and numbers of CEO’s picture. The variables used on this research if from fraud pentagon theory perspective. This research’s population is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2017 to 2020. The sample of this research is selected by using purposive sampling based on several criteria. This research uses 302 data from 101 listed manufacturing companies as the sample. The method used for analyzing and testing the data on this research is by multiple regression to see the influence between independent variables and fraudulent financial reporting. The result of this research shows that financial targets, nature of industry, and auditor’s opinion have significant influence on fraudulent financial reporting. In contrast, financial stability, external pressure, institutional ownership, number of audit committee members, ineffective monitoring, external auditor quality, the change of auditor, change of directors, proportion of independent commissioner, and numbers of CEO’s picture have no significant value to fraudulent financial reporting.
PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DAN KARAKTERISTIK PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP MANAJEMEN LABA Frengky; Ita Trisnawati; Dicky Supriatna
E-Jurnal Akuntansi TSM Vol 2 No 4 (2022): E-Jurnal Akuntansi TSM
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34208/ejatsm.v2i4.1842

Abstract

This research aims to obtain empirical evidence on whether the components of good corporate governance and company characteristics influence earnings management. This research has eleven independent variables, namely audit quality, board of commissioners, managerial ownership, auditor independence, institutional ownership, audit committee, profitability, firm size, free cash flow, financial leverage, and sales growth. This research used a sample of 210 data from 70 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2019 to 2021. This study used a purposive sampling method for sample selection and used multiple regression for data analysis. The results of this research indicate that audit quality, profitability, and free cash flow affect earnings management. However, other independent variables such as the board of commissioners, auditor independence, audit committee, institutional ownership, financial leverage, firm size, sales growth, and managerial ownership do not affect earnings management.
PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL, KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL DAN KARAKTERISTIK PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP MANAJEMEN LABA Valensia; Ita Trisnawati
E-Jurnal Akuntansi TSM Vol 2 No 4 (2022): E-Jurnal Akuntansi TSM
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34208/ejatsm.v2i4.1845

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain empirical evidence about the effect of the independent variables namely managerial ownership, institutional ownership, firm size, leverage, profitability, sales growth, and free cash flow on earnings management as the dependent variable. The population of this research are non-financial firms that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period of 2019 until 2021. This study uses a total sample of 116 companies or 348 data for 3 periods. The sample selection in this study used purposive sampling and the analysis of this research test used multiple regression methods. The results of this study indicate that profitability and free cash flow have an effect on earnings management, meanwhile managerial ownership, institutional ownership, firm size, leverage, sales growth have no effect on earnings management.
Factors that affect Fraudulent Financial Reporting Kharissa Setiawan; Ita Trisnawati
Media Bisnis Vol. 14 No. 2 (2022): Media Bisnis
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34208/mb.v14i2.1666

Abstract

The objective of this research is to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of factors that can affect fraudulent financial reporting. Those factors are financial targets, financial stability, external pressure, institutional ownership, number of audit committee members, ineffective monitoring, nature of industry, external auditor quality, the change of auditor, auditor’s opinion, change of directors, proportion of independent commissioner, and numbers of CEO’s picture. The variables used on this research if from fraud pentagon theory perspective. This research’s population is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2017 to 2020. The sample of this research is selected by using purposive sampling based on several criteria. This research uses 302 data from 101 listed manufacturing companies as the sample. The method used for analyzing and testing the data on this research is by multiple regression to see the influence between independent variables and fraudulent financial reporting. The result of this research shows that financial targets, nature of industry, and auditor’s opinion have significant influence on fraudulent financial reporting. In contrast, financial stability, external pressure, institutional ownership, number of audit committee members, ineffective monitoring, external auditor quality, the change of auditor, change of directors, proportion of independent commissioner, and numbers of CEO’s picture have no significant value to fraudulent financial reporting.