Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional
Budi Suhariyanto
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA-RI Jl. Jend. Ahmad Yani Kav.58 Jakarta Pusat
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Masalah Eksekutabilitas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi oleh Mahkamah Agung Budi Suhariyanto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.155 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1318

Abstract

Normatively constitutional court and supreme of court has on equal position with a different authority. However, there is a relationship of authority and point of contact. Morever, potential to cause disharmony on law enforcement. For example, on implementation of the constitutional court’s decision directly followed by the decision of the supreme court but some others not. The constitutional court’s decision characteristic are final and binding general (erga omnes), at the same level with legislation (negatif legislator), undirectly binding and enforced by the supreme court. Fundamentally, judge at the supreme court and the courts below is not a mouthpiece of the law, therefore it has some authority to interpre the statute (was also againts the decision of the constitutional court) to be applied on cases they handle. Although the judges decision of the supreme court do not decide on the validity and constitutionality of the norm, but through the efforts of the discovery  or the interpretation of the law can gives an effect to the law enforcement and the establishment of a progressive and responsive legal reform.
EKSISTENSI PEMBENTUKAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM DALAM DINAMIKA POLITIK LEGISLASI DI INDONESIA Budi Suhariyanto
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 4, No 3 (2015): December 2015
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (448.615 KB) | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v4i3.14

Abstract

Secara normatif hakim Indonesia disebut sebagai Penegak hukum dan keadilan tidak sebatas corong undang-undang. Hakim wajib untuk menemukan, menggali dan membentuk hukum yang sesuai dengan nilai dan rasa keadilan masyarakat. Secara teoritis pembentukan hukum oleh Hakim pun diakui sebagai salah satu sumber hukum formil dalam sistem hukum Indonesia dan dapat diakomodasi oleh DPR (Positif Legislator) dalam pembaruan undang-undang. Tulisan ini bermaksud untuk meneliti masalah eksistensi pembentukan hukum oleh hakim dalam dinamika politik legislasi (baik yang bersifat positif legislasi sebagaimana diwenangi oleh DPR bersama Presiden maupun negatif legislator yang diperankan oleh putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi). Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, diperoleh kesimpulan bahkan dalam konteks tertentu Hakim didorong untuk melakukan pembentukan hukum baru yang berfungsi sebagai a tool of social engineering . Jika pembentukan hukum oleh Hakim diikuti secara konstan oleh Hakim lain maka dapat dijadikan sebagai sumber hukum formil dalam sistem hukum nasional (yurisprudensi).Normatively in Indonesia, a judge is also known as the law and justice enforcement agency, not just decided cases based on written law. Judges are obliged to discover, explore and establish a legal system that suitable with local values and sense of justice. Theoretically Judge Decisions (known also as Jurisprudence) are also recognized as one of the source of formal lawsin the Indonesian legal system and can be accommodated by the Parliament (Positive Legislators) in the renewal of the law. This paper intends to examine the existence of the Judge made laws in dynamic-political process of legislation (whether positive legislation that is ruled by the House of Representatives and the President or negative legislator who are ruled by the Constitutional Court). Using a normative-legal research method, the conclusion even in the context of a particular judges are encouraged to establish anew legal construction that intended as a tool of social engineering. If the judge-made law is followed constantly by other judges, it can be used as a source of formal law in the national legal system (jurisprudence).
Co-Authors