Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Toward Islamic Psychology: Understanding of Mental Illness from Qur'anic Verses Katimin Katimin; Zainal Abidin; Adelina Nasution; Ismail Fahmi Arrauf Nasution
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol 5, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (363.365 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v5i1.2482

Abstract

This article discusses an interpretation of the Qur’an by Abdullah Saeed using the contextual interpretation model. However, this paper will focus on how Abdullah Saeed developed the concept of the hierarchy of values inspired by Fazlur Rahman's thought, which discussed the problem hierarchy of values as general principles. However, Fazlur Rahman did not provide specific devices to develop the hierarchy of values. Abdullah Saeed developed and formulated the concept hierarchy of values into five levels, including obligatory values, fundamental values, protective values, implementational values, and instructional values. The five hierarchies of values become a complete unified frame as an effort to the contextual interpretation of the Qur’an, especially the ethico-legal verses that mostly fill the daily life of most Muslims based on the understanding of maqashid al-sharia and the concept of good deeds. This study uses a descriptive analysis method and hermeneutic analysis techniques to apply the concept hierarchy of values in the Qur’anic interpretation. The results of this paper are in the contextual interpretation of QS. Al-Hujurat verses 1-18 contain the five hierarchical levels of values that have been specifically conceived by Abdullah Saeed
Narsisme Ulama: Dilema dan Posibilitas Rekonstruksi Ushul Fiqh di Indonesia Adelina Nasution
Al-Ahkam Volume 28, Nomor 2, Oktober 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (233.661 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2018.18.2.2308

Abstract

This paper  describe the construction of the uṣūl al-fiqh  initiated by Hasan al-Turabi that be dialogued with the religious conditions in Indonesia. Its aim is to find the possibility and inventory the constraints of the reconstruction of the uṣūl al-fiqh in Indonesia. This study uses the hermeneutical method of Paul Ricoeur in analyzing the theoretical ideas of Hasan al-Turabi. In this study found the biggest dilemma of reconstruction of uṣūl al-fiqh in Indonesia: the narcissism of scholars and egoism of intellectuals. Apart from that, there are conditional possibilities found, in order to reconstruct uṣūl al-fiqh  in Indonesia, i.e.: 1) willingness, facilities, protection and consis­tency of the government, and 2) the inclusiveness of traditional clerics in order to create a dialogue on the traditional jurisprudence understood by them with the modern scholars and experts of various sciences. The author concluded that only the integration of modern sciences with the traditional Islamic jurisprudence, that uṣūl al-fiqh re­con­struction could be implemented in Indonesia.
MUI Legal Fatwa on Vaccine Halalness in COVID-19 Vaccination Socialization in Medan City, Indonesia Nispul Khoiri; Adelina Nasution
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (356.918 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v16i1.5146

Abstract

One of the Government's strategic policies in suppressing and stopping the transmission of COVID-19 is to take the vaccination movement seriously. Even though the vaccination program has a positive aim, while people have doubt and even refuse to use vaccines because they are considered illegal and dangerous. Responding to this friction, this is where the importance of the MUI fatwa in socializing that vaccination is very urgent and allowed to be carried out. There is no serious objection to vaccination in Medan City; even most Medan Muslims claim that the MUI fatwa brings benefits. This article belongs to field research with a qualitative approach. The methodology used is an interpretive study of the sociology of law by conducting interviews and reviewing documents related to the MUI fatwa on COVID-19 vaccination. The result concluded that; the MUI fatwa in Medan City has been well received by the community and is considered necessary. Second, the effectiveness of the halal Sinovac vaccine has been tested and is of good quality and is allowed to use. There is no severe objection regarding vaccination in Medan City; even most Medan Muslims claim that the MUI fatwa brings benefits.
Ḥaḍānah conflict resolution through litigation: analysis of sharia court decisions in Aceh Nispul Khoiri; Adelina Nasution
Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan Vol 22, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/ijtihad.v22i2.177-198

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the resolution of ḥaḍānah conflicts through litigation, specifically the decisions of the Sharia Court in Aceh regarding child custody (ḥaḍānah) to find legal certainty. This research uses a normative-empirical type of research by integrating normative law and empirical law. Normative legal analysis is carried out by examining library archives or secondary data. This research uses laws and judges' decisions in ḥaḍānah cases at the Aceh Syariah Courts. The instruments used in collecting data are observation, interviews, and documents or literature studies. To obtain research data on the number of ḥaḍānah cases that were filed separately at the Sharia Court, the article draws on existing decisions starting from 2016-2021. In this research, 5 (five) Sharia Courts were taken as research samples with 32 ḥaḍānah cases, particularly the Sharia Courts in Langsa, Kuala Simpang, Idi, Jantho, and Takengon. The research applies the theory of legal objectives according to Gustav Radbruch: legal certainty, justice, and expediency. The research shows that legal certainty through the decision of the Sharia Court has been realized. However, this has not provided justice for children because many defendants have not complied with court decisions, especially the surrender of child custody according to court decisions and payment of monthly child support according to what has been decided by the court. Hence, the benefits of the court decisions on the ḥaḍānah case are still not maximized. The solution is to formulate a law that is capable of providing a deterrent effect for defendants unwilling to fulfill court compliance.