Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Living Hadis
Siska Helma Hera
UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta
Religion Humanities

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Kritik Ignaz Goldziher dan Pembelaan Musthofa al Azami terhadap Hadis dalam Kitab Shahih al-Bukhari Siska Helma Hera
Jurnal Living Hadis Vol 5, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/livinghadis.2020.2310

Abstract

Criticism of the hadith will always appear, even though the scholars have agreed that the hadith is valid. This can be seen from the Sahih Bukhari book, which has been agreed by the ulama’ as a valid hadith book, but still received criticism from an orientalist named Ignaz Goldziher. Ignaz revealed that not all hadith listed in Sahih Bukhari are authentic, some of them are dhaif and maudhu’. In addition, Ignaz criticized the method used by Imam al Bukhari in researching hadith. According to him, Imam al Bukhari only focused on sanad and forgot the matan. Ignaz's criticism led to the conclusion that the traditions contained in Sahih Bukhari were not authentic from the Prophet Muhammad. According to him, these traditions were the result of fabrication by the generations after the Prophet. This conclusion is also corroborated by the reason for the codification of the hadith that occurred long after the Prophet generation. Responding to Ignaz's criticism, Musthofa al Azami (Muslim scholar) revealed that all of Ignaz's criticisms were baseless and could not be validly established as truth.
Co-Authors