<![CDATA[Objective: To compare the indirect and CAD/CAM techniques and using acrylic and composites resins onthe fracture resistance of provisional 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs).Materials and Methods: In in vitro setting, thirty samples were divided into three groups included 10FPDs manufactured indirectly and made of composite based bis-acryl (Protemp 4) resin, 10 FPDs indirectlymilled with polymethyl methacrylate resin (PMMA) and 10 FPDs fabricated by CAD/CAM PMMA blocks.Fracture resistance was measured using universal testing machine (UTM). The master model was made ofNiCr-alloy which designed using CAD/CAM technology.Results: FPDs fabricated using CAD/CAM PMMA blocks showed the highest fracture resistance valuesfollowed by Protemp 4 and then PMMA using indirect method. Statistically significant difference wasfound between the three groups (P=0.001). Bonferroni test was applied for pair wise comparison, in whichthe statistically significant difference was observed between FPDs fabricated by CAD/CAM which madeof PMMA blocks and Protemp 4 and between CAD/CAM PMMA blocks and indirect/PMMA FPDs andbetween indirect/Protemp 4 FPDs and indirect/PMMA FPDs. Hence this suggested that PMMA significantlyhas minimum value of fracture resistance when compared to both CAD/CAM and Protemp 4.Conclusion: This study proved the superiority of CAD/CAM PMMA blocks for fabricating 3-unit FPDsover Protemp 4 and PMMA using indirect method, and the superiority of Protemp 4 over PMMA in termsof fracture resistance using indirect methods]]>
