Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Insignia: Journal of International Relations Global Political Studies Journal
Wahyu Rozzaqi Ginanjar
Magister Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Arts Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran NGO dalam Tata Kelola Global: Keterlibatan Amnesty International dalam UN Summit for Refugee and Migrant 2016 Wahyu Rozzaqi Ginanjar
Insignia: Journal of International Relations Vol 7 No 1 (2020): April 2020
Publisher : Laboratorium Hubungan Internasional, FISIP, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (601.607 KB) | DOI: 10.20884/1.ins.2020.7.1.2277

Abstract

The refugee crisis is a global problem that needs serious attention. Responsibility-sharing is a core tenet of international responses to refugee crises. However, global governance, within the framework of the global refugee regime, is often practically ineffective to respond such problems. In this aspect, conceptual evaluation and reform are needed. In this particular momentum, civil society groups are able to be involved, in both performance evaluation and framework formulation related to global governance on refugees. One of the formal form of civil society is a non-governmental organization (NGO). Amnesty International is one of the NGOs involved in the process of evaluating and reforming global governance on refugees. This article aims to find out the form of Amnesty International's involvement in global governance on refugees. This study used descriptive-qualitative method. The findings in this article are that Amnesty International has a direct involvement in order to evaluate and to reform the global governance framework related to refugees through the 2016 UN High Summit for Refugee and Migrant. This involvement was demonstrated through performance evaluations and proposals for more genuine responsibility-sharing, both at the conceptual and technical level. Amnesty International in this involvement pursued an agenda that has two dimensions, namely: the dimension of institutional evolution and the agenda dimension.
Diplomasi Bencana India terhadap Nepal pada Tahun 2015 Wahyu Rozzaqi Ginanjar
Global Political Studies Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Global Political Studies Journal
Publisher : Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/gpsjournal.v4i1.2839

Abstract

Disaster is an inevitable thing for all human beings. Very often disasters occur in certain political contexts. Disaster diplomacy is an effort of a country to improve the quality of diplomacy with other countries by utilizing disasters to open new opportunities in terms of diplomatic context. This was done by India following the massive earthquake in Nepal in 2015. India has very specific concerns related to domestic conditions in Nepal. India's concern over Nepal's domestic conditions is generally related to the issue of the Madhes movement in the Tarai region. This became a concern to India because the Madhes movement has created instability in the Tarai region that has disrupted India's economic agenda in the South Asian region. Based on this, India then encouraged a number of diplomatic efforts in the context of creating reconciliation between the Madhes and Pahadi groups who were in conflict in Nepal. The earthquake in Nepal was used by India as a catalyst to support diplomatic efforts to create a more stable domestic condition in Nepal. This article then tries to discuss the form of disaster diplomacy carried out by India towards Nepal. Using the concept of disaster diplomacy from Ian Kelman, this article illustrates India's efforts to utilize the Nepal earthquake disaster as a catalyst to improve the quality of diplomacy towards Nepal as a whole in relation to the Madhes movement. This article discovers the fact that Indian disaster diplomacy met a contrary to what was expected outcome, following the growing conflict between Madhes and Pahadi groups after the 2015 Nepal earthquake.
Co-Authors