Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Governance Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Supardi Supardi
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility In Indonesia Based on Ius Positum And Islamic Principles Supardi Supardi
Journal of Governance Volume 7 Issue 1: (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v7i1.14718

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a form of a company's responsibility to the community and the surrounding environment that are affected by the company's activities. CSR is a familiar term when viewed from a legal perspective, including in Islamic law. So far, there has been no alternative concept of CSR that has been extracted from the values contained in the culture and belief system, including Islamic teachings, even though the values built by each culture and belief aim to achieve community welfare. Based on this, this study aims to find out whether the existing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) concept follows the principles of Islamic law. Has Islam regulated this? So that the activities carried out by the company are of worship value for business actors. This is normative legal research that refers to primary, secondary and tertiary materials. The result of the study is that CSR is contained in the teachings of Islam; Islam has long been building a system of life-based on social principles and justice. Islam strongly supports CSR because it cannot be denied that business creates many unexpected social problems. As a result, it is the responsibility of the company and the company to fix the problem. This is natural because they need to explore various natural resources for business sustainability. Therefore, they must be responsible for the community and the environment in return.
Implementation of Economic Crime After The Provision of Law Number 11 of 2021 Concerning The Prosecutor Supardi .
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v21i1.1940

Abstract

The Criminalization of Economic Crimes occurred on May 11, 1995 which was marked by the birth of the Law on Economic Crimes (UUTPE). Since the birth of the law, the term "harming the economy" has emerged, which is similar to the element "harming the country's economy" in the Corruption Crime (TPK) offense. On December 31, 2021, the Prosecutor's Law (UUK) was promulgated which gives authority to investigate, investigate and prosecute cases of Economic Crimes (TPE), but in the explanation of Article 35 paragraph (1) letter k provides an interpretation of economic crimes such as the interpretation of "harmful" the country's economy” in the TPK. The use of the phrase "harming the country's economy" in the explanation of Article 35 paragraph (1) letter k of the UUK raises interpretation problems regarding the meaning of "harming the economy" as referred to in the UUPE which can have an impact on implementation in creating justice and legal certainty in handling TPE cases. Therefore, this study formulated the formulation of the problem as follows: (1) How to interpret the TPE regulated in the UUTPE (2) How to distinguish the TPE regulated in the UUTPE and UUTPK and (3) How to measure the authority of the Prosecutor's Office in handling TPE cases so as to create justice and legal certainty. The research method used is normative juridical, namely a method that refers to the applicable laws or regulations, legal theories or opinions of scholars. The research is based on secondary data, while the research specifications used are descriptive analytical. The data sources used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study conclude that: (1) UUTPE has not been revoked and is still valid as ius constitutum, (2) The basic differences in the state economy between UUTPE and UUTPK are: TPE is more related to the world of trade and is not related to strategic policies of the central or regional government and (3) Based on Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 the Prosecutor's Office has the authority to handle TPE cases, but the definition of the state economy according to the law is still confusing because it is equated with the meaning in the UUTPK
Co-Authors