R. Kartikasari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Keabsahan Keadaan Solven Debitor sebagai Dasar Pertimbangan dalam Perkara Kepailitan Clarita Stefanie Panjaitan; R. Kartikasari; Artaji Artaji
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i1.27480

Abstract

AbstractThis article will discuss the basic considerations of the judge in considering the debtor’s solvent condition as the reason for rejecting the bankruptcy case. This article also provides an explanation that the consideration of debtor solvent conditions as the implementation of the principle of balance in the examination of bankruptcy cases is an essential thing to resolve the problems that occur in the Bankruptcy Law in order to create legal certainty for the parties The research method used in this article is a normative legal research method that is descriptive analytical, with the application of a normative juridical approach, by observing secondary data legal materials, with data collection techniques through document studies, with library analysis. The results of the article indicate that Judges must apply the principle of balance by taking into account the debtor’s solvent condition in examining Bankruptcy cases in order to protect the interests of the parties and the interests of the business community.Keywords: Bankruptcy; Insolvency Test; Principle of Balance.AbstrakPenelitian ini akan membahas mengenai dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam mempertimbangkan mengenai keadaan solven Debitor sebagai alasan penolakan perkara Kepailitan. Penelitian ini juga memberikan penjelasan bahwa pertimbangan keadaan solven Debitor sebagai implementasi asas keseimbangan dalam pemeriksaan perkara kepailitan, merupakan suatu hal yang esensial guna menyelesaikan problematika yang terjadi dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan demi mewujudkan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif analitis, dengan penerapan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan melakukan pengamatan terhadap bahan-bahan hukum data sekunder, dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi dokumen, dengan analisis kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Hakim haruslah menerapkan asas keseimbangan dengan turut mempertimbangkan keadaan solven Debitor dalam memeriksa perkara Kepailitan guna melindungi kepentingan para pihak serta kepentingan masyarakat bisnis.Kata Kunci: Kepailitan; Insolvency Test; Prinsip Keseimbangan.
OPTIMALISASI HAK PEMEGANG SAHAM ATAS KEWENANGAN OJK DALAM PELAKSANAAN AKUISISI LEMBAGA JASA KEUANGAN BANK PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 Andrea Sukmadilaga; R. Kartikasari; Ema Rahmawati
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021): Volume 12 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/di.v12i2.3501

Abstract

After the issuance of PERPPU Number 1 of 2020 concerning State Financial Policy and Financial System Stability for Handling the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and / or In the Context of Facing Threats That Endanger the National Economy and / or Financial System Stability, OJK can give written orders for the Bank to conduct restructuring, one of which is the Acquisition and is authorized to conduct due diligence on prospective Bank Controlling Shareholders. The method used in writing this article is a normative juridical research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the discussion show that the authority of the OJK in implementing the Acquisition has not taken into account the Shareholders' Rights guaranteed in the Company Law as well as any illegal actions by OJK which resulted in a Forced Acquisition or Hostile Takeover. OJK's discretion regarding the implementation of the Acquisition is not in line with the Freedom of Contract Principle because the Bank has independence in the implementation of the GMS for the corporate agenda, the Bank is also part of a Limited Liability Company that is subject to the Company Law so that the Optimization of Shareholders' Rights needs to be improved.