Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Quality and Affordable Education through Quality Management Systems in Higher Education Muhammad Afif Hasbullah; Nisaul Barokati Selirowangi; Mohammad Syaiful Pradana; Buyun Khulel; Moh Hudi
EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): March 2020
Publisher : STAI Miftahul Ula Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29062/edu.v3i2.52

Abstract

The general goal of education is to develop Indonesian people completely in the sense that carried out education still maintain unity, diversity and develop individual’s ideals. Every citizen has the right to obtain education equally with excellence and a balance (equity) between the utilization (access) with achievement. The higher education system must be able to create a quality higher education that is also affordable by the people of Indonesia. A university leader must be in-line and lead a "quality revolution". All energy and attention are focused on the "quality revolution". For this reason, this paper will examine the Implementation of Higher Education Quality Management Systems. As a case study is that has implemented a Quality Management System. According to Law No. 12 of 2012 concerning Higher Education. Quality Higher Education is Higher Education that produces graduates who are able to actively develop their potential and produce Science and / or Technology that is useful for the Community, nation, and country. The government operates a higher education quality assurance system to get quality education. The Higher Education quality assurance system referred to consists of: a. internal quality assurance system developed by Higher Education; and b. external quality assurance system carried out through accreditation. Implementation of Quality Management Systems in Higher Education can produce Quality and Affordable Education.
MAKNA PERSETUJUAN BERSAMA DPR DAN PRESIDEN DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG Aris Arianto; Afif Hasbullah; Sholihan Sholihan
MIMBAR YUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Juni 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v3i1.1843

Abstract

The establishment of the Act must be approved by the President as stated in Article 20 of the 1945 Constitution paragraph (2). Interesting when Indonesia uses a presidential system with the separation of powers. However, in the formation of the Act involving the President. Article 20 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution confirms the necessity of mutual agreement in the discussion and ratification of the Law. However, there are other assertions, namely that in Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution, even without the President's signature, the Act can still be promulgated within 30 days of the Draft Law being discussed. Things like that can't just happen without a reason. Therefore, the writing of this study will look for the meaning of the agreement between the DPR and the President in the formation of the Law and how the legal politics of Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution. The writing of this study is focused on researching and searching for the meaning of mutual agreement and focusing on legal politics from Article 20 paragraph 5 of the 1945 Constitution. The research method in this writing is normative juridical. The results of the research can be concluded that the meaning of the joint agreement between the DPR and the President in the establishment of the Law is an agreement in determining the policy in the form of a Law which is a reflection of the principle of checks and balances. Legal politics Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution is an affirmation of Article 20 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution or can be called an affirmation of collective agreement. The establishment of the Act must be approved by the President as stated in Article 20 of the 1945 Constitution paragraph (2). Interesting when Indonesia uses a presidential system with the separation of powers. However, in the formation of the Act involving the President. Article 20 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution confirms the necessity of mutual agreement in the discussion and ratification of the Law. However, there are other assertions, namely that in Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution, even without the President's signature, the Act can still be promulgated within 30 days of the Draft Law being discussed. Things like that can't just happen without a reason. Therefore, the writing of this study will look for the meaning of the agreement between the DPR and the President in the formation of the Law and how the legal politics of Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution. The writing of this study is focused on researching and searching for the meaning of mutual agreement and focusing on legal politics from Article 20 paragraph 5 of the 1945 Constitution. The research method in this writing is normative juridical. The results of the research can be concluded that the meaning of the joint agreement between the DPR and the President in the establishment of the Law is an agreement in determining the policy in the form of a Law which is a reflection of the principle of checks and balances. Legal politics Article 20 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution is an affirmation of Article 20 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution or can be called an affirmation of collective agreement.
LEGALITAS JASA TRANSPORTASI ONLINE DALAM PERSPEKTIF PENGATURAN LALU LINTAS DAN ANGKUTAN JALAN Nur Afit Santoso; Afif Hasbullah; Muwahid Muwahid
MIMBAR YUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Juni 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v4i1.1960

Abstract

The issues discussed in this paper concerning the regulation of transportation services based on information technology in the Laws and Regulations. And the legality of information technology-based transportation services in the perspective of Law no. 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transport (UU LLAJ). This paper uses a normative juridical research type, using a statute approach, conceptual approach and analitycal approach. The information technology-based transportation services are regulated in the LLAJ Law, Government Regulation Number 74 Year 2014 on Road Transportation (PP No. 74 Year 2014), and Regulation of the Minister of Transportation Number 118 Year 2018 on the Implementation of Special Rental Transportation (Permenhub No. 118 Year 2018). Regarding the legality of information technology-based transportation services in the perspective of LLAJ Law, it is said to be legal if it is subject to the provisions of Permenhub. 118 of 2018.