Baskoro Daru Tjahjono
Balai Arkeologi Sumatera Utara

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Syailendrawangsa: Sang Penguasa Mataram Kuna Baskoro Daru Tjahjono
Berkala Arkeologi Sangkhakala Vol 16 No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4010.767 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/bas.v16i2.102

Abstract

AbstractThe history of the ancient Mataram has been an intriguing discussion matter due to a seemingly endless problematic arising from the lack of data. However, increasing historical, archaeological researches, and new data findings complicate the issue. This article does not aim at providing justification over any of various perspectives proposed by any archaeologists or historians; rather, it tries to reveal and comprehend the historical matter of the ancient Mataram from one point of view. The historical approach suggests that there was only one ruling dynasty in the ancient Mataram, the Syailendrawangsa. Sanjaya was one of the descendant kings of Syailendrawangsa. The origins of the dynasty can be traced back through the Sojomerto inscription found in Batang, Central Java Province. The Syailendrawangsa was established by Dapunta Selendra, a native Indonesian. Mantyasih and Wanua Tengah III, under the instruction of Balitung, tell records about the lineage of the Syailendra dynasty or Syailendrawangsa from Sanjaya though Balitung. Some of the kings believed in Siva and others in Buddha. The inscriptions also have reports on four (4) names of the capital cities of the ancient Mataram: Poh Pitu, Mamratipura, Tamwlang, and Watugaluh; the locations which are not identified exactly. The different locations of the capital suggest the constant mobility of the kingdom centre of power. Early study predicts that the first two mentioned capitals are located in Central Java, while the latter two are in Jombang, East Java Province.AbstrakBicara tentang sejarah kerajaan Mataram Kuna selalu menarik, karena selalu akan ada permasalahan yang muncul akibat terbatasnya data. Namun semakin banyak penelitian sejarah maupun arkeologi dan semakin banyaknya temuan data baru, semakin rumit pula permasalahan yang muncul. Oleh karena itu, maksud tulisan ini tidak untuk membuktikan mana yang benar di antara berbagai pandangan para ahli tersebut, melainkan hanya ingin mengungkap dan memahami permasalahan kesejarahan kerajaan Mataram Kuna dari salah satu sudut pandang saja. Melalui pendekatan dengan metode historis, yang mengikuti salah satu pendapat bahwa hanya ada satu dinasti di kerajaan Mataram Kuna, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa Syailendrawangsalah penguasa tunggal kerajaan Mataram Kuna. Sanjaya adalah salah satu raja keturunan Syailendrawangsa. Asal-usul dinasti ini dapat diketahui dari prasasti Sojomerto yang ditemukan di Batang Jawa Tengah. Syailendrawangsa didirikan oleh Dapunta Selendra yang merupakan orang asli Indonesia. Dari prasasti Mantyasih dan prasasti Wanua Tengah III yang dikeluarkan oleh Balitung dapat diketahui silsilah raja-raja Dinasti Syailendra atau Syailendrawangsa, yang diawali oleh Sanjaya sampai Balitung. Di antara raja-raja keturunan wangsa Syailendra itu ada yang memeluk agama Siwa dan ada yang memeluk agama Buddha. Diketahui pula adanya empat nama ibukota kerajaan Mataram Kuna, yang menunjukkan bahwa pusat kerajaan sering berpindah tempat. Keempat nama ibukota kerajaan itu adalah Poh Pitu, Mamratipura, Tamwlang, dan Watugaluh. Namun keempat pusat kerajaan itu belum dapat diidentifikasi lokasinya -- baru dapat diperkirakan -- dua nama pertama berada di wilayah Jawa Tengah dan dua nama terakhir diperkirakan di wilayah Jombang Jawa Timur.
Mencari Identitas Kota Salatiga: Nuansa Kolonial di Antara Bangunan Modern Baskoro Daru Tjahjono
Berkala Arkeologi Sangkhakala Vol 14 No 2 (2011)
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3071.858 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/bas.v14i2.145

Abstract

AbstrakEvery city surely has its development histories prior to its current state. Unique chracteristics must also be contained in it as an identity. A certain era influencing a current state of a city can be oberved through building architecture as well as city layout. A question may arise as losses of a previous period, out of maintenance, or new building replacements were the cases. It would be a tricky matter to investigate an identity of a city, especially of the city of Salatiga, which is an inseparable question to many modern city development?AbstrakSetiap kota tentu mempunyai sejarah perkembangannya masing-masing sebelum menjadi seperti saat ini. Setiap kota tentu juga mempunyai ciri khas masing-masing, yang akan menjadi identitas kota tersebut. Masa-masa apa yang paling mewarnai wajah kota saat ini dapat diamati dari arsitektur bangunan maupun tata ruang kotanya. Tetapi permasalahannya bagaimana jika banyak bangunan masa lalu yang telah hilang, tak terpelihara, dan dibongkar diganti dengan bangunan baru. Masihkah kita bisa mencari identitas kota, khususnya kota Salatiga yang juga tidak lepas dari permasalahan perkembangan kota modern saat ini?
Memimpikan Museum yang Menarik Pengunjung Baskoro Daru Tjahjono
Berkala Arkeologi Sangkhakala Vol 13 No 26 (2010)
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (657.294 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/bas.v13i26.167

Abstract

AbstractActually, the presence of museums in Indonesia has been quite a long time. From time to time, the museum has been progressing, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The main purpose of the museum is for fun and learning for the community. But until now, most of the museums in Indonesia have not been able to attract many visitors. In general, the Indonesian people are still as consumers or spectators. Therefore, to attract visitors, the museum should be made as attractive as possible, building, exhibition layout, lighting, equipment room and the attractions.
BATU TABUNG BERPRASASTI DI CANDI GUNUNG SARI (JAWA TENGAH) DAN NAMA MATA ANGIN DALAM BAHASA JAWA KUNO Baskoro Daru Tjahjono; Arlo Griffths; Veronique Degroot
Berkala Arkeologi Vol 34 No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3573.349 KB) | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v34i2.23

Abstract

This article presents an architectural and epigraphical study of several objects recovered from the Central Javanese temple site of Gunung Sari. The site has yielded unique cylindrical stone objects, some of which bear short inscriptions in Old Javanese language indicating the directions of space. Based on architectural arguments, we conclude that the temple was a Śaiva monument. The cylindrical objects were most likely placed originally in the floor of the platform of the temple, where they covered foundation deposits placed during the construction of the temple in connection with the ritual preparation of the ground plan. Although objects exactly identical in shape have thus far not been discovered in Java, objects that had different shapes but similar ritual functions can be identified at other more or less contemporary sites in the region. Some of these bear inscriptions. The inscriptions of Candi Gunung Sari are, however, unique in that they offer by far the oldest (nearly) complete system of eight directions of space expressed in Javanese terms.
BATU TABUNG BERPRASASTI DI CANDI GUNUNG SARI (JAWA TENGAH) DAN NAMA MATA ANGIN DALAM BAHASA JAWA KUNO Baskoro Daru Tjahjono; Arlo Griffths; Veronique Degroot
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 34 No. 2 (2014)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v34i2.23

Abstract

This article presents an architectural and epigraphical study of several objects recovered from the Central Javanese temple site of Gunung Sari. The site has yielded unique cylindrical stone objects, some of which bear short inscriptions in Old Javanese language indicating the directions of space. Based on architectural arguments, we conclude that the temple was a Åšaiva monument. The cylindrical objects were most likely placed originally in the floor of the platform of the temple, where they covered foundation deposits placed during the construction of the temple in connection with the ritual preparation of the ground plan. Although objects exactly identical in shape have thus far not been discovered in Java, objects that had different shapes but similar ritual functions can be identified at other more or less contemporary sites in the region. Some of these bear inscriptions. The inscriptions of Candi Gunung Sari are, however, unique in that they offer by far the oldest (nearly) complete system of eight directions of space expressed in Javanese terms.