Andina Nurul Wahidah
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF FEMALE LECTURER CHARACTERISTICS IN TEACHING: A STUDY OF THE IDEOLOGY OF GENDER SEGREGATION AT STATE UNIVERSITIES IN PONTIANAK Andina Nurul Wahidah; Khairawati Khairawati
Raheema Vol 8, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : PSGA LP2M IAIN Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/raheema.v8i1.1659

Abstract

This study seeks to examine students’ perceptions towards the characteristics of female lecturers at State Universities in the city of Pontianak and identify the position of the ideology of gender segregation in the realm of the lecturer as an occupation. This quantitative survey research employed a closed-ended questionnaire as the primary data collection instrument. The questionnaire was administered to 286 students of faculty of education at the state Universities in the city of Pontianak. Pearson product-moment was used to test the validity of the items in the questionnaire by taking those of r0.3 as the valid question items. The reliability test using SPSS Statistics version 23.0 showed the Cronbach alpha value of 0.75. Descriptive statistics as a data analysis method was carried out using SPSS Statistics version 23.0. The results of this study highlighted female lecturers’ characteristics and position in the ideology of gender segregation from the students’ point of view. First, students’ perception revealed (1) the characteristics of female lecturer namely sanguine personality type (33.98%), (2) the communication readiness dominated by the power factor (37.14%), and (3) personal-social characteristics at the negative extreme of easily offended (33.19%), at the central point of tolerance (14.13%), and at the positive extreme of attention (26.13%). Second, the lecturer, as an occupation in the public sector is suitable for women with a percentage of positive responses of 91.47% with the determinant factors for successful classroom teaching and learning comprising the quality cognitive, social, and personal characters of lecturers without gender segregation.
Efektivitas Layanan Khusus Konsultasi Tatap Muka (KTM) dalam Perkuliahan Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif pada Program Studi PAI FTK IAIN Pontianak Andina Nurul Wahidah
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (276.67 KB) | DOI: 10.31004/jpdk.v4i4.5187

Abstract

Perkuliahan Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif diharapkan mampu menghasilkan output berupa produk proposal penelitian yang berkualitas sesuai kaidah ilmiah. Namun seringkali, masih terjadi miskonsepsi jika perkuliahan hanya didominasi oleh materi yang bersifat teoritis. Sehingga, lahir sebuah gagasan pemberian layanan khusus berupa Konsultasi Tatap Muka (KTM) bagi mahasiswa oleh dosen pengampu perkuliahan. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada tahun 2022 dengan tujuan mengukur efektivitas pemberian layanan khusus KTM dalam perkuliahan Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif pada mahasiswa Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) FTIK IAIN Pontianak. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuantitatif jenis quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan Randomized Solomon 4 Group Design. Dengan jumlah populasi sebanyak 152 orang (5 kelas), dipih 4 kelas sebagai sampel penelitian melalui teknik cluster sampling. Teknik tes dengan instrument ruubrik penilaian digunakan sebagai pengumpulan data utama yang selanjutnya dianalisis dengan teknik analisis statistic descriptive. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pemberian layanan khusus KTM dikategorikan efektif. Berdasarkan rerata hasil pre-test E1 (68,50) dan post-test E1 (75,20) dengan selisih pada kelompok eksperimen 1 sebesar 6,70. Sedangkan rerata hasil pre-test C1 (75,08) dan rerata hasil post-test C1 (76,50) dengan selisih kelompok kontrol 1 sebesar 1,42. Selanjutnya, nilai selisih antar kelompok pada kelompok eksperimen 2 E2 (80,10) dengan kelompok kontrol 2 C2 (73,85) menunjukkan selisih sebesar 6,25