Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perbuatan catcalling dalam perspektif hukum positif Tauratiya Tauratiya
EKSPOSE Vol 19, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ekspose.v1i1.690

Abstract

Catcalling as one of the actions that violates morality and categorized as criminal act oftenly unnoticed, because this action is done spontaneously. Many societies in Indonesia don't realize that they are victim or even perpetrator of catcalling act. This is because of the lack of understanding in society about the catcalling act itself. This act unwittingly has reduced a person's right, like the right to have a peaceful life, the right to feel safe while doing activities, the right to feel at ease in building life and living and happy physically and mentally in society living, so that this act needs to be vanished. However, the perpetrator of this catcalling act is hard to be caught to the realm of law until now as long as they didn't do physical violence to the victim, but in this case there needs to be an emphasis to stop this catcalling act and to entangle as well as to make the perpretators aware of this act, and also by giving the understanding about catcalling law to the public, especially the victims could bring this case to attain the justice for each victim. Catcalling act in Indonesia categorized as criminal act and contradictive to law and morality. Law enforcement regarding the catcalling act in Indonesia so far haven't got any legal certainty, even the handling and resolving of this catcalling problem could not be done decisively. Catcalling victims are still having trouble getting their justice. So far the protection of catcalling victims regulated in Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights, and Law No. 31 of 2014 on Changes to Law No. 13 of 2006 on Victim and Witness Protection as the legal basis. While for perpetrator of catcalling act could be charged with Article 281 Item (2) and Article 315 on Criminal Code and Article 34 juncto Article 8, Article 35 juncto Article 9 Law No. 34 of 2008 on Pornography.Catcalling sebagai salah satu perbuatan atau tindakan yang bertentangan dengan kesusilaan dan dikategorikan sebagai suatu tindak pidana seringkali tidak terperhatikan, hal ini dikarenakan tindakan atau perbuatan tersebut dilakukan secara spontan. Banyak kalangan masyarakat di Indonesia yang tidak menyadari bahwa dirinya adalah korban atau bahkan pelaku perbuatan catcalling. Hal ini dikarenakan kurangnya pemahaman terhadap masyarakat tentang catcalling itu sendiri. Perbuatan catcalling tanpa sadar telah mengurangi hak-hak asasi seseorang, seperti hak untuk merasakan kehidupan yang damai, hak untuk merasa aman dalam beraktifitas, hak untuk merasa tentram membangun hidup dan kehidupan serta bahagia lahir dan batin dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, sehingga keberadaan catcalling ini penting untuk dihilangkan. Akan tetapi, Pelaku perbuatan catcalling sampai saat ini masih sulit untuk dijerat keranah hukum selama tidak melakukan kekerasan fisik terhadap korban, tetapi dalam hal ini perlu adanya penekanan untuk menghentikan perbuatan catcalling dan menjerat sekaligus menyadarkan pelaku catcalling, serta dengan memberikan pemahaman tentang aturan hukum catcalling kepada publik, terutama korban dapat membawa kasus ini guna merandapatkan keadilan bagi hak asasi masing-masing korban. Catcalling di Indonesia dikategorikan kedalam salah satu perbuatan pidana atau suatu tindak pidana dan bertentangan dengan hukum dan kesusilaan. Penegakan hukum terhadap perbuatan catcalling di Indonesia sejauh ini belum memiliki kejelasan dan kepastian hukum, bahkan penanganan dan penyelesaian terhadap perkara catcalling ini tidak bisa diselesaikan secara tegas. Korban catcalling masih sulit untuk mendapatkan keadilan bagi dirinya. Sejauh ini perlindungan terhadap korban perbuatan catcalling diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) dan Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban sebagai dasar hukumnya. Sedangkan, Sedangkan bagi pelaku perbuatan catcalling dapat dikenakan Pasal 281 butir (2) dan Pasal 315 pada KUHP dan Pasal 34 j.o Pasal 8, dan Pasal 35 j.o Pasal 9 Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pornografi.
OVERMACHT: ANALISIS YURIDIS PENUNDAAN PELAKSANAAN PRESTASI AKIBAT PANDEMI COVID-19 Tauratiya Tauratiya
JURNAL ILMIAH MIZANI: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi, dan Keagamaan Vol 7, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UINFAS Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v7i1.3094

Abstract

On March 14, 2020, the government of the Republic of Indonesia announced the Covid-19 pandemic as a National Disaster. The whole community was asked to stay at home or work from home. This situation caused the daily activities of the community and government from school, work, trade, and others to become ineffective and delayed. This also affects all national and global corporate activities. Many business entities are disrupted due to the Large-Scale Social Limitation policy, so the company or a person cannot keep their promises as made in the previous agreement. This study examines whether Pandemic Covid-19 can be used as a reason for a person or a company to postpone the performance of achievements because it is considered as an overmacht, and how the legal force. This is a qualitative-library research using a juridical-normative approach. The results showed that overmacht is equated with the term force majeure meaning the state of force, in this case the debtor cannot be held accountable, because the situation occurs outside his control and not because of an element of negligence. The state of overmacht is regulated in the provisions of Article 1244 and Article 1245 of the Civil Code. The Covid-19 pandemic is considered as a forced condition, including the overmacht category, so that it can be used as an excuse for debtors to postpone or not carry out performance according to the agreement, provided that the debtor is able to provide reasons that the failure to fulfill the agreement is not because of them, but because something cannot be predictable, and inevitable.
Ruislag Tanah Wakaf: Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 25 Tahun 2018 di Bukit Baru Kota Pangkalpinang Ditinjau dari Istihsan Rizki Pratama; Winarno Winarno; Tauratiya Tauratiya
JYRS: Journal of Youth Research and Studies Vol 4 No 2 (2023): Jurnal JYRS Desember 2023
Publisher : FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN EKONOMI ISLAM IAIN SYAIKH ABDURRAHMAN SIDDIK BANGKA BELITUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32923/jyrs.v4i2.3800

Abstract

Ruislag waqf land is one example of the many human needs currently so that the government makes regulations to adapt to the needs of the community. The existence of regulations regarding Waqf Land Ruislag which are contained in Government Regulation Number 25 of 2018 concerning the Implementation of Waqf Land Ruislag, has created a new color in society. Along with the understanding of people who follow only one school of thought or the general public in implementing waqf. The problem in this article is, how is the implementation of Waqf Land Ruislag in Bukit Baru Pangkalpinang City, Bangka Belitung Islands Province Based on Government Regulation Number 25 of 2018 and how is the Implementation of Waqf Land Ruislag in Bukit Baru Pangkalpinang City, Bangka Belitung Islands Province Based on Government Regulation Number 25 of 2018 Reviewed from Istihsan. This research is qualitative research using a Juridical-Empirical approach. The source of this research is primary data obtained from observations and interviews with the Head of the local Religious Affairs Office as well as observations and interviews with the chairman of the nadzir and the treasurer of the mosque under study. Then it is also equipped with supporting secondary data. Rules regarding Government Regulation Number 25 of 2018 concerning the Implementation of Waqf Land Ruislag. Case studies in Bukit Baru, Pangkalpinang City, show that the procedures and conditions set out in it are aimed at utilizing waqf land (ruislag) by creating facilities that support religious interests. Istihsan's review of the implementation of the Government Regulation in Bukit Baru, Pangkalpinang City, is a form of collective responsibility for the condition of waqf land which has no use or value in it to cover the harm in an effort to utilize waqf land (ruislag) and maintain waqf property so that it is useful for the benefit of general (Istihsan bil Al-Maslahah).