Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pleno Jure Meraja journal SIGn Jurnal Hukum
Arianty Anggraeny Mangarengi
Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Perkawinan Dibawah Umur Melalui Kewenangan Kantor Urusan Agama (Studi Kasus di KUA Kabupaten Bantaeng) Yuli Adha Hamzah; Arianty Anggraeny Mangarengi; Andika Prawira Buana
PLENO JURE Vol 9 No 2 (2020): Pleno Jure, Oktober
Publisher : LL-DIKTI Wilayah IX Sulawesi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37541/plenojure.v9i2.431

Abstract

Dewasa ini marak terjadi perkawinan dibawah umur yang menyebabkan implikasi hukum yang negatif, salah satu daerah yang menjadi tempat maraknya prakter tersebut terdapat di kabupaten bantaeng, dimana perkawinan dibawah umur terus terjadi dan mulai meresahkan masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah ingin mengetahui kewenangan Kantor Urusan Agama terhadap legalitas perkawinan dibawah umur serta untuk mengetahui faktor - faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya perkawinan dibawah umur. Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Kantor Urusan Agama Kabupaten Bantaeng. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tidak efektifnya pelaksanan Undang - Undang Perkawinan karena masih terdapatnya beberapa perkawinan dibawah umur yang terjadi dengan dalih adanya permohonan dispensasi perkawinan serta masih terdapatnya beberapa penyimpangan - penyimpangan hukum dalam hal prosedur pelaksanaan perkawinan dibawah umur oleh oknum Kantor Urusan Agama, dan hasil penelitian lain menunjukkan terdapat 5 (lima) faktor yang mempengaruhi kewenangan Kantor Urusan Agama terhadap legalitas perkawinan dibawah umur antara lain faktor pengetahuan hukum, faktor aparat hukum, faktor budaya hukum, faktor hamil diluar nikah dan faktor ekonomi. Faktor-faktor tersebut menjadi alasan kuat mengapa perkawinan dibawah umur ini masih terus terjadi. Abstract. Nowadays underage marriages are rampant which causes negative legal implications, one of the areas where this practice is rampant is in Bantaeng district, where underage marriages continue to occur and begin to disturb the community. The purpose of this study was to determine the authority of the Office of Religious Affairs on the legality of underage marriage and to determine the factors that influence the occurrence of underage marriage. This study uses a qualitative research type with an empirical juridical approach. This research was conducted at the Office of Religious Affairs in Bantaeng Regency. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of the Marriage Law is ineffective because there are still several underage marriages that occur on the pretext of the existence of applications for marriage dispensation and there are still several legal irregularities in the procedure for implementing underage marriage by persons in the Office of Religious Affairs, and the results Other research shows that there are 5 (five) factors that influence the authority of the Office of Religious Affairs on the legality of underage marriage, including legal knowledge, law enforcement factors, legal culture factors, extramarital pregnancy factors and economic factors. These factors are strong reasons why underage marriages continue to occur.
EFEKTIVITAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 44 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PORNOGRAFI DI KOTA MAKASSAR Arianty Anggraeny Mangarengi
Meraja journal Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Vol 2 No 2, Juni 2019.
Publisher : P3M Stia Al Gazali Barru and Meraja media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (357.361 KB) | DOI: 10.33080/mrj.v2i2.36

Abstract

[Full Paper] to pdf
Kedudukan Undang-Undang Perkawinan terhadap Perkawinan Beda Agama di Luar Negeri Arianty Anggraeny Mangarengi; Yuli Adha Hamzah
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 3 No 1: April - September 2021
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v3i1.127

Abstract

This study aims to determine the position and authority of Law No. 16 of 2019 in responding to interfaith marriages abroad. The type of legal research used is a dogmatic juridical research method. The data collection in this study was carried out through a literature study of laws and regulations, journals, research results, and books. This study uses hermeneutic analysis and interpretation methods to analyze the data used in this study. The study results show that interfaith marriage is not justified in all scriptures recognized in Indonesia. Couples who want to have interfaith marriages can hold them abroad. Meanwhile, from the state’s point of view, interfaith marriages are inconsistent. In this case, Law No. 16 of 2019 does not justify interfaith marriage, while Law No. 24 of 2013 can determine the marital status of interfaith abroad. So that the legal certainty of interfaith marriages is not based on Law No. 16 of 2019 but Law No. 24 of 2013. Therefore, it is suggested that the government amend Law No. 16 of 2019. In this case, it contains norms that legitimize interfaith marriages as regulated in Law No. 24 of 2013. If Law No. 16 of 2019 is considered still relevant to the socio-cultural conditions of Indonesia, the government must amend Law No. 24 of 2013. In this case, it is removing norms that legitimize interfaith marriages. The amendments to the legislation attempt to resolve inconsistencies in the legislation related to interfaith marriages.
Kewenangan PPAT dalam Pembuatan AJB Terkait Tanah Warisan Milik Anak di Bawah Umur Yuli Adha Hamzah; Arianty Anggraeny Mangarengi
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 4 No 2: Oktober 2022 - Maret 2023
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v4i2.253

Abstract

This research aims to examine and analyze the authority of PPAT in making AJB related to heritage land owned by a minor and identify the factors that hinder the sale and purchase of heritage land rights. The study used normative and empirical research methods, including direct interviews and a literature review of legal materials. Results showed that the PPAT will conduct a preliminary examination of the documents of the sale and purchase of land rights to avoid problems arising due to failure to meet material and formal requirements. Specifically, the seller must attach the Court Decision on the legal guardian, the testator’s death certificate, and the inheritor’s certificate to fulfill the formal requirement of the legal acts. Furthermore, the factors that hinder the sale and purchase of heritage land rights: are document availability, coordination among related parties, legal and bureaucratic procedures, and personal or psychological factors. Therefore, it is recommended that PPAT, Courts, and other parties involved in the sale and purchase of heritage land rights actively improve communication and coordination. Additionally, it is essential to simplify legal procedures and bureaucracy associated with making AJB, including managing required documents such as the Court Decision on the legal guardian, the testator’s death certificate, and the inheritor’s certificate. Furthermore, legal training and education for PPAT and related parties are needed to increase understanding of the material and formal requirements that must be met in the legal act of the sale and purchase of heritage land rights.
Co-Authors Andika Prawira Buana Yuli Adha Hamzah