Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi
Oly Viana Agustine
Peneliti pada Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Konstitusi Ekonomi Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASeAn (MeA) Tahun 2015 Oly Viana Agustine
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 4 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (571.959 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1148

Abstract

Constitutional economics is the main out line of the state indetermining the policy direction in the preparation, implementation and protection of the country’s economy and citizens. Thought contained in the constitutionin economics will be a guide in the country’s economic development and economic policy formation. Importance of economics in the constitution, would be a zone defense in them iddle of the development of the more advanced economies of the developed and developing countries in preparation for the implementation of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) by 2015 MEA conceptis formed by a single market in Southeast Asia. MEA it self aim stoin crease competition and improve the quality of ASEAN citizens to be able tobe competitive with people outside ASEAN. In addition to the MEA expected to attractin ward investment in ASEAN so as to provide increased economic and social welfare of ASEAN. With the MEA provides an easier alternative path way in which a country is able to sell the products of both goods and services easily.
Interpretasi Lembaga Negara dan Sengketa Lembaga Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara Oly Viana Agustine
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 4 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (400.917 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1444

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas mengenai penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan antarlembaga negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Dalam penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan konstitusional antar lembaga negara itu terdapat 2 (dua) hal penting yang harus dieksplorasi yaitu soal konsepsi lembaga negara dan kewenangan konstitusional. Guna memahami lembaga negara terlebih dahulu harus melakukan pengelompokan berdasarkan landasan yuridis pembentukannya. Berdasarkan pembentukannya lembaga negara dapat dikelompokkan menjadi 3 (tiga), yaitu lembaga negara yang dibentuk berdasarkan Keppres, UU, dan UUD. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Nomor 004/SKLN-IV/2006 tanggal 12 Juli 2006 telah merumuskan kata “lembaga negara yang kewenangannya diberikan oleh Undang-Undang Dasar” dalam Pasal 24C ayat (1) UUD 1945 dengan menggunakan penafsiran gramatika (grammatische interpretatie). Menurut Mahkamah Konstitusi, dalam menentukan subjectum litis atau objectum litis perkara sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara yang kewenangannya diberikan UUD 1945 maka ditentukan terlebih dahulu kewenangan-kewenangan yang diberikan dalam Undang-Undang Dasar dan baru kemudian kepada lembaga apa kewenangan-kewenangan tersebut diberikan.This article is about settlement disputes between authorities of state institutions by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. In the resolution of disputes between the state institutions there are 2 (two) important things that must be explored, the conception of constitutional state institutions and authority. To understand state institutions once must be done is grouping by the juridical of its formation. Based on its juridical formation state institutions can be grouped into 3 (three), that is institutions formed based on the presidential decree, law, and the constitution. The verdict of The Constitutional Court No 004/SKLN-IV/2006 dated 12 July 2006, Constitutional Court has formulated “state institutions under the authority granted by the constitution” regarding Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution by using grammatical interpretation (grammatische interpretatie). According to The Constitutional Court, in order to determine subjectum litis or objectum litis in settlement disputes of authorities of state institutions cases that authority granted by 1945 Constitution, ones must be considered is the existence of certain authorities in the Constitution and then to which institutions those authorities are given.
Konstitusi Ekonomi Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASeAn (MeA) Tahun 2015 Oly Viana Agustine
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 4 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (571.959 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1148

Abstract

Constitutional economics is the main out line of the state indetermining the policy direction in the preparation, implementation and protection of the country’s economy and citizens. Thought contained in the constitutionin economics will be a guide in the country’s economic development and economic policy formation. Importance of economics in the constitution, would be a zone defense in them iddle of the development of the more advanced economies of the developed and developing countries in preparation for the implementation of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) by 2015 MEA conceptis formed by a single market in Southeast Asia. MEA it self aim stoin crease competition and improve the quality of ASEAN citizens to be able tobe competitive with people outside ASEAN. In addition to the MEA expected to attractin ward investment in ASEAN so as to provide increased economic and social welfare of ASEAN. With the MEA provides an easier alternative path way in which a country is able to sell the products of both goods and services easily.
Interpretasi Lembaga Negara dan Sengketa Lembaga Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara Oly Viana Agustine
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 4 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (400.917 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1444

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas mengenai penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan antarlembaga negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Dalam penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan konstitusional antar lembaga negara itu terdapat 2 (dua) hal penting yang harus dieksplorasi yaitu soal konsepsi lembaga negara dan kewenangan konstitusional. Guna memahami lembaga negara terlebih dahulu harus melakukan pengelompokan berdasarkan landasan yuridis pembentukannya. Berdasarkan pembentukannya lembaga negara dapat dikelompokkan menjadi 3 (tiga), yaitu lembaga negara yang dibentuk berdasarkan Keppres, UU, dan UUD. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Nomor 004/SKLN-IV/2006 tanggal 12 Juli 2006 telah merumuskan kata “lembaga negara yang kewenangannya diberikan oleh Undang-Undang Dasar” dalam Pasal 24C ayat (1) UUD 1945 dengan menggunakan penafsiran gramatika (grammatische interpretatie). Menurut Mahkamah Konstitusi, dalam menentukan subjectum litis atau objectum litis perkara sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara yang kewenangannya diberikan UUD 1945 maka ditentukan terlebih dahulu kewenangan-kewenangan yang diberikan dalam Undang-Undang Dasar dan baru kemudian kepada lembaga apa kewenangan-kewenangan tersebut diberikan.This article is about settlement disputes between authorities of state institutions by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. In the resolution of disputes between the state institutions there are 2 (two) important things that must be explored, the conception of constitutional state institutions and authority. To understand state institutions once must be done is grouping by the juridical of its formation. Based on its juridical formation state institutions can be grouped into 3 (three), that is institutions formed based on the presidential decree, law, and the constitution. The verdict of The Constitutional Court No 004/SKLN-IV/2006 dated 12 July 2006, Constitutional Court has formulated “state institutions under the authority granted by the constitution” regarding Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution by using grammatical interpretation (grammatische interpretatie). According to The Constitutional Court, in order to determine subjectum litis or objectum litis in settlement disputes of authorities of state institutions cases that authority granted by 1945 Constitution, ones must be considered is the existence of certain authorities in the Constitution and then to which institutions those authorities are given.
Co-Authors