Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi
Abdul Jalil
STIS Kebumen Jawa Tengah Jl. Kutoarjo KM.12 Mekarsari Kutowinangun Kebumen Jawa Tengah 54393
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tumpang Tindih Kewenangan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Abdul Jalil
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 4 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (571.761 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1044

Abstract

This paper is going to discuss the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 93/ PUU-X/2012 related to granting of the petition for judicial review of Law No. 21 Year 2008 concerning Islamic Banking (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year  2008  Number  94,  namely  Article  55  paragraph  (2)  and  paragraph (3) governing the settlement of disputes with respect to Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, which says that the Act  should guarantee  legal  certainty and justice and do not have binding legal force. While in Article 55 paragraph (1), described Sharia Banking Dispute resolution by the court within the Religious Courts, while paragraph (2), stated in terms of the parties’ dispute has betoken  than those referred to in paragraph (1), the settlement of disputes in accordance with the contents of the Agreement, then, in paragraph (3) Settlement of disputes referred to in paragraph (2) must not conflict with Sharia. In addition to this, the paper will also question the extent of absolute authority of the Religious Courts institutions related to the settlement of economic disputes shari’a as stipulated in Law No. 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts    .
Tumpang Tindih Kewenangan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Abdul Jalil
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 4 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (571.761 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1044

Abstract

This paper is going to discuss the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 93/ PUU-X/2012 related to granting of the petition for judicial review of Law No. 21 Year 2008 concerning Islamic Banking (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year  2008  Number  94,  namely  Article  55  paragraph  (2)  and  paragraph (3) governing the settlement of disputes with respect to Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, which says that the Act  should guarantee  legal  certainty and justice and do not have binding legal force. While in Article 55 paragraph (1), described Sharia Banking Dispute resolution by the court within the Religious Courts, while paragraph (2), stated in terms of the parties’ dispute has betoken  than those referred to in paragraph (1), the settlement of disputes in accordance with the contents of the Agreement, then, in paragraph (3) Settlement of disputes referred to in paragraph (2) must not conflict with Sharia. In addition to this, the paper will also question the extent of absolute authority of the Religious Courts institutions related to the settlement of economic disputes shari’a as stipulated in Law No. 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts    .
Co-Authors