Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

1.235

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Constitutional Review Jurnal Yudisial DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Cendekia : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Konstitusi

Iskandar Muda

Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas YARSI.

Author-ID : 2491996

Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

Pro-Kontra dan Prospektif Kewenangan Uji Konstitusionalitas Perpu Muda, Iskandar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Pros and cons of the authority to deal with judicial constitutionality review of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu) either from fellow judges of the Constitutional Court (MK) or from the world of legal science is acceptable. The pros and cons is not due to the differences in interests between them, but it is caused by the differences in schools or schools of thought and interpretation methodologies adopted. The authority of the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of Perpu is in line with the philosophy of Judicial Activism (the concept of active understanding) which is identical to the "Statue of the Goddess of Justice" whose eyes are not closed in order to be able to watch and absorb the "sense of social justice", to incorporate the living legal values in the society, respond to the demand and aspiration of the people and, furthermore, to create “the thinking judges” which make their decisions responsive. However, the authority of the Court to review the constitutionality of the Perpu might cause “broader impacts” in the future which means that the impact will not be only on the constitutionality review of the Perpu but also on the other decisions of Constitutional Court.

Konstitusionalitas Mengenai Kekuasaan Negara dalam Kegiatan Penanaman Modal (Analisis Putusan MK No. 21- 22/PUU-V/2007) Muda, Iskandar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 6 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

What it means by “under state control” on article 33 point (2) and (3) of UUD 1945, should not be interpreted that the state will control totally the entire economic activities that serve the public basic; the state is not a company refers to democratic economy of Indonesia which hinder monopoly on business by any state or etatism (state monopoly). The precise understanding of “under state control“ is state responsibility to manage and drive the economy regulation correctly.

Fenomena Two in One Pengujian Perppu Muda, Iskandar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Dua lembaga negara sama-sama berwenang menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu); Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) “berwenang” berdasarkan Pasal 22 ayat (2) dan ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, sedangkan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) berdasarkan putusannya No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 menyatakan “berwenang pula.” Dengan adanya dua lembaga negara yang mempunyai kewenangan yang sama tersebut maka (dapat) terjadi fenomena. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada tiga bentuk fenomena Two in One Pengujian Perppu yang (dapat) terjadi. Pertama, “judicial examination for constitutionality to Perppu pre-legislative review.” Kedua, “judicial examination for constitutionality to Perppu post-legislative review.” Ketiga, jika terjadi judicial review Perppu di MK baik dalam keadaan bentuk fenomena pertama atau fenomena kedua tetapi dalam waktu yang berlarut-larut DPR tidak memberikan keputusan tidak menyetujui atau menyetujui Perppu menjadi undang-undang. Prosedur hukum untuk bentuk fenomena kedua tidak jauh berbeda dengan prosedur hukum fenomena bentuk pertama; prosedur hukum serta yang dijadikan dasar pertimbangannya mempunyai kesamaan. Sedangkan prosedur hukum untuk bentuk fenomena ketiga perlu pula dikaji lebih lanjut secara mendalam untuk mencapai titik temu oleh dua pihak (DPR dan MK) yang berwenang menguji Perppu. Bentuk fenomena dan prosedur hukum pertama dan kedua bisa dikatakan sebagai jenis kewenangan yang bersifat pasif. Sedangkan bentuk fenomena dan prosedur hukum yang ketiga bisa dikatakan sebagai jenis kewenangan yang bersifat aktif.Two state institutions are equally authorized to test the Government Regulation in Lieu of Laws (Perppu); The House of Representatives (DPR) is “authorized” based on Article 22 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, while the Constitutional Court (MK) based on its verdict No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 declared “authorized as well.” With the existence of two state institutions that have the same authority, then the phenomena (can) happen. This research is a legal research using normative approach. The results of the study showed that there are three forms of phenomena of Two in One Perppu review which (can) happened. First, “judicial examination for the constitutionality to Perppu pre-legislative review.” Second, “judicial examination for the constitutionality to Perppu post-legislative review.” Third, in the case of Perppu judicial review in the Constitutional Court, either in the form of the first phenomenon or the second phenomenon, yet in the long period the DPR does not give a decision whether to approve the Perppu or not into the law. The legal procedure for the form of the second phenomenon is not much different from the legal procedure of the first form phenomenon; legal procedures and the basis of their considerations are merely the same. While the legal procedure for the third form of the phenomenon should also be studied further in depth to reach the final point by two parties (DPR and MK) authorized to review the Perppu. The first and the second forms of the phenomena and legal procedures can be regarded as a kind of passive authority. While the third form of the phenomena and legal procedures can be regarded as a type of active authority.

Prospek Penjatuhan Putusan Provisi dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Provisional petition is not common in judicial review cases. This paper seeks to find the basis for submitting a provisional petition and the pattern of ruling on the provisional petition. The results showed that there were three things that became the basis for the petition for provisions, namely: (i) there were allegations of criminal acts in the formation of the law that was petitioned for review; (ii) protecting the constitutional rights which are seriously threatened and cannot be restored in the final judgment; and (iii) the urgent need for time to obtain a judge’s decision before the election, especially with regard to the right to vote and be elected. There were three pattern of rendering decisions on provisional petition, namely (i) dropped when the case examination process is ongoing and stated in writing before making the final decision; (ii) pronounced orally in court when the case examination process is ongoing and then reaffirmed in writing in the final decision; and (iii) decided simultaneously with the subject matter of the petition in the final judgment.

Logika Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Uji Konstitusional Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Settlement of the problem of testing the law in the Constitutional Court (constitutional review) is also needed to find out the logic of the law and its relationship. If two statements are displayed simultaneously it will give rise to what by logic is called “logic relationship.” In the settlement of the six cases of constitutional review of the law on the Position of Notary Public (Law No. 30 Year 2004) and its Amendments (Law No. 2 Year 2014) revealed the use of various kinds of legal logic in legal considerations (ratio decidendi) of the Court. This research is a legal research using normative approach. The results showed that: (i) Constitutional Court Decision No. 009-014/PUU-III/2005 uses the legal logic of “equivalence relations,” (ii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 52/PUU-VIII/2010 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (iii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship,” (iv) Constitutional Court Decision No. 72/PUU-XII/2014 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (v) Constitutional Court Decision No. 43/PUU-XV/2017 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” and (vi) in Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XVII/2019 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship.”

Co-Authors Frengki Hardian Mohammad Ryan Bakry Sulhan Sulhan Taufik Hidayat

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search Journal : Jurnal Konstitusi

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Konstitusi