Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

The Legal Logic of the Collapse on Non-Retroactive Doctrine in the Constitutional Court Decision Muda, Iskandar
Constitutional Review Vol 3, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The non-retroactive doctrine as a legal principle did not apply retroactively. In legal system of Indonesian; Article 28I paragraph (1) of 1945 Constitution determines that a human right can not be prosecuted based on retroactive law as well as rights that can not be reduced under any circumstances. Similarly Article 58 of Law No. 24 Year 2003 concerning Constitutional Court determines that a Law is being reviewed by the Constitutional Court is still applied, before there is decision stated that the law is contrary to the 1945 Constitution. However, with the use of âlegal logic of implication relationshipsâ in Constitutional Court Decision No. 110-111-112-113/PUU-VII/2009, the decision was made retroactive and it become the jurisprudence for the Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-IX/2011 and Decision No. 13/PUU-XI/2013.

Pro-Kontra dan Prospektif Kewenangan Uji Konstitusionalitas Perpu Muda, Iskandar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Pros and cons of the authority to deal with judicial constitutionality review of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu) either from fellow judges of the Constitutional Court (MK) or from the world of legal science is acceptable. The pros and cons is not due to the differences in interests between them, but it is caused by the differences in schools or schools of thought and interpretation methodologies adopted. The authority of the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of Perpu is in line with the philosophy of Judicial Activism (the concept of active understanding) which is identical to the "Statue of the Goddess of Justice" whose eyes are not closed in order to be able to watch and absorb the "sense of social justice", to incorporate the living legal values in the society, respond to the demand and aspiration of the people and, furthermore, to create “the thinking judges” which make their decisions responsive. However, the authority of the Court to review the constitutionality of the Perpu might cause “broader impacts” in the future which means that the impact will not be only on the constitutionality review of the Perpu but also on the other decisions of Constitutional Court.

Konstitusionalitas Mengenai Kekuasaan Negara dalam Kegiatan Penanaman Modal (Analisis Putusan MK No. 21- 22/PUU-V/2007) Muda, Iskandar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 6 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

What it means by “under state control” on article 33 point (2) and (3) of UUD 1945, should not be interpreted that the state will control totally the entire economic activities that serve the public basic; the state is not a company refers to democratic economy of Indonesia which hinder monopoly on business by any state or etatism (state monopoly). The precise understanding of “under state control“ is state responsibility to manage and drive the economy regulation correctly.

Fenomena Two in One Pengujian Perppu Muda, Iskandar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Dua lembaga negara sama-sama berwenang menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu); Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) “berwenang” berdasarkan Pasal 22 ayat (2) dan ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, sedangkan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) berdasarkan putusannya No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 menyatakan “berwenang pula.” Dengan adanya dua lembaga negara yang mempunyai kewenangan yang sama tersebut maka (dapat) terjadi fenomena. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada tiga bentuk fenomena Two in One Pengujian Perppu yang (dapat) terjadi. Pertama, “judicial examination for constitutionality to Perppu pre-legislative review.” Kedua, “judicial examination for constitutionality to Perppu post-legislative review.” Ketiga, jika terjadi judicial review Perppu di MK baik dalam keadaan bentuk fenomena pertama atau fenomena kedua tetapi dalam waktu yang berlarut-larut DPR tidak memberikan keputusan tidak menyetujui atau menyetujui Perppu menjadi undang-undang. Prosedur hukum untuk bentuk fenomena kedua tidak jauh berbeda dengan prosedur hukum fenomena bentuk pertama; prosedur hukum serta yang dijadikan dasar pertimbangannya mempunyai kesamaan. Sedangkan prosedur hukum untuk bentuk fenomena ketiga perlu pula dikaji lebih lanjut secara mendalam untuk mencapai titik temu oleh dua pihak (DPR dan MK) yang berwenang menguji Perppu. Bentuk fenomena dan prosedur hukum pertama dan kedua bisa dikatakan sebagai jenis kewenangan yang bersifat pasif. Sedangkan bentuk fenomena dan prosedur hukum yang ketiga bisa dikatakan sebagai jenis kewenangan yang bersifat aktif.Two state institutions are equally authorized to test the Government Regulation in Lieu of Laws (Perppu); The House of Representatives (DPR) is “authorized” based on Article 22 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, while the Constitutional Court (MK) based on its verdict No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 declared “authorized as well.” With the existence of two state institutions that have the same authority, then the phenomena (can) happen. This research is a legal research using normative approach. The results of the study showed that there are three forms of phenomena of Two in One Perppu review which (can) happened. First, “judicial examination for the constitutionality to Perppu pre-legislative review.” Second, “judicial examination for the constitutionality to Perppu post-legislative review.” Third, in the case of Perppu judicial review in the Constitutional Court, either in the form of the first phenomenon or the second phenomenon, yet in the long period the DPR does not give a decision whether to approve the Perppu or not into the law. The legal procedure for the form of the second phenomenon is not much different from the legal procedure of the first form phenomenon; legal procedures and the basis of their considerations are merely the same. While the legal procedure for the third form of the phenomenon should also be studied further in depth to reach the final point by two parties (DPR and MK) authorized to review the Perppu. The first and the second forms of the phenomena and legal procedures can be regarded as a kind of passive authority. While the third form of the phenomena and legal procedures can be regarded as a type of active authority.

Prospek Penjatuhan Putusan Provisi dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Provisional petition is not common in judicial review cases. This paper seeks to find the basis for submitting a provisional petition and the pattern of ruling on the provisional petition. The results showed that there were three things that became the basis for the petition for provisions, namely: (i) there were allegations of criminal acts in the formation of the law that was petitioned for review; (ii) protecting the constitutional rights which are seriously threatened and cannot be restored in the final judgment; and (iii) the urgent need for time to obtain a judge’s decision before the election, especially with regard to the right to vote and be elected. There were three pattern of rendering decisions on provisional petition, namely (i) dropped when the case examination process is ongoing and stated in writing before making the final decision; (ii) pronounced orally in court when the case examination process is ongoing and then reaffirmed in writing in the final decision; and (iii) decided simultaneously with the subject matter of the petition in the final judgment.

Logika Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Uji Konstitusional Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Settlement of the problem of testing the law in the Constitutional Court (constitutional review) is also needed to find out the logic of the law and its relationship. If two statements are displayed simultaneously it will give rise to what by logic is called “logic relationship.” In the settlement of the six cases of constitutional review of the law on the Position of Notary Public (Law No. 30 Year 2004) and its Amendments (Law No. 2 Year 2014) revealed the use of various kinds of legal logic in legal considerations (ratio decidendi) of the Court. This research is a legal research using normative approach. The results showed that: (i) Constitutional Court Decision No. 009-014/PUU-III/2005 uses the legal logic of “equivalence relations,” (ii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 52/PUU-VIII/2010 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (iii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship,” (iv) Constitutional Court Decision No. 72/PUU-XII/2014 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (v) Constitutional Court Decision No. 43/PUU-XV/2017 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” and (vi) in Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XVII/2019 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship.”

PERANAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH KHUSUS IBUKOTA JAKARTA: ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENGENAAN BEA PEROLEHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN BANGUNAN TERHADAP PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL-BELI Taufik Hidayat; Iskandar Muda; Mohammad Ryan Bakry
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 10, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : FH Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v10i1.2458

This study aims to determine the role of a Notary in the imposition of acquisition on Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) DKI Jakarta for the transfer of rights to land and buildings with the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) and to determine the legal position of the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB). in the transfer of land and building rights to be subject to BPHTB. This research is a normative juridical research conducted by examining library materials or secondary legal materials as the basic material for research.The results of this study indicate the role of the Notary/Land Deed Making Official (PPAT) in the development of DKI Jakarta through the imposition of Customs on the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) on land and building sale and purchase transactions with PPJB is very meaningful/big, because indirectly is the party that oversees/controls or acts as a gateway so that BPHTB tax debt payments are fulfilled by BPHTB taxpayers as financing for regional development, starting from spending on employees/state institutions to infrastructure development, education costs, health costs, and the construction of public facilities And the position of the Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land Rights made by a Notary is valid and binding if it is based on the terms of the validity of the agreement and is made by or before public officials who are authorized to do so at the place where the deed was made as regulated in Article 15 of the Law-Law Number 30 of 2004 and its amendment Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of NotaryKeywords: BPHTB, Notary; Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB); Tax.

INTERPRETASI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERKAIT UJI KONSTITUSIONAL PASAL 66 UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 13, No 3 (2020): DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v13i3.440

ABSTRAK Uji konstitusional Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, baik dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 maupun perubahannya yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014, setidaknya sampai saat ini sudah ada empat putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terkait uji konstitusional pasal a quo, yaitu Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/ PUU-X/2012, 72/PUU-XII/2014, 22/PUU-XVII/2019, dan 16/PUU-XVIII/2020. Di mana uji konstitusional pasal a quo terkait pengaturan tata cara pemanggilan notaris untuk kepentingan penyidikan dan pemeriksaan. Berdasarkan pertimbangan hukum keempat putusan a quo, terlihat jelas Mahkamah Konstitusi telah melakukan interpretasi teks-teks hukum. Penelitian hukum normatif yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dan dikarenakan pula objeknya adalah norma, dengan demikian teknik interpretasi dari isi norma tersebut adalah teknik yang paling sesuai untuk menjawab permasalahan. Yang pada akhirnya pula, kualitas penelitian hukum dapat diukur dari kualitas analisis konseptual, kualitas penalaran dan retorika, dan yang terakhir, kualitas referensi dalam teks. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa keempat putusan a quo terlihat Mahkamah Konstitusi melakukan kegiatan interpretasi tekstual dan/atau meta-tekstual. Begitu pula, setelah diamati terdapat hubungan tidak langsung antara salah satu pertimbangan hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-X/2012 dengan perubahan Pasal 66 sebagaimana terdapat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014; sehingga terjaga pula kehormatan notaris dengan diperlukannya sikap kehati-hatian dari penegak hukum dalam melakukan tindakan hukum terhadap notaris. Oleh karena itu pula keempat putusan a quo berbeda-beda amar putusannya, ada yang dikabulkan, tidak dapat diterima dan/ataupun ditolak.Kata kunci: jabatan notaris; interpretasi; undang-undang. ABSTRACT There have been four decisions of the Constitutional Court regarding the constitutional review of the a quo article in constitutional review Article 66 of the Law on Notary Position, both in Law Number 30 of 2004 and its amendments, namely Law Number 2 of 2014. There are the Constitutional Court Decision Number 49/PUU-X/2012, 72/PUU- XII/2014, 22/PUU-XVII/2019, and 16/PUU-XVIII/2020. The constitutional review of the a quo article related to the arrangement of the procedures for summoning a notary is for investigation and examination purposes. Based on legal considerations, the four a quo decisions clarify that the Constitutional Court has interpreted legal texts. Normative legal research is used in this study because the object is the norm. Thus the interpretation technique of the norm contents is the most appropriate technique to answer the problem. The last thing, the quality of legal research can be measured from the quality of conceptual analysis, the quality of reasoning and rhetoric, and nally, the quality of references in the text. The study results reveal that the four a quo decisions are seen by the Constitutional Court conducting textual and/or meta-textual interpretation activities. After observing, there is an indirect relationship between one of the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 49/ PUU-X/2012 with amendments to Article 66 as contained in Law Number 2 of 2014. To maintain the notary honor, law enforcers need a cautious attitude in taking legal actions against notaries. Therefore, the four a quo decisions have different verdicts; some are granted, cannot be accepted, and/or rejected. Keywords: notary position; interpretation; law.

PENAFSIRAN HUKUM YANG MEMBENTUK KEADILAN LEGAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 9, No 1 (2016): DIVERGENSI TAFSIR
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v9i1.30

ABSTRAKUU Perbankan Syariah merupakan aturan khusus tentang perbankan yang berprinsip syariah karena aturan hukum konvensional perbankan yang sudah ada belum mengatur secara khusus terkait perbankan syariah. Namun ada pihak yang melakukan uji konstitusionalitas berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 kepada Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) atas UU Perbankan Syariah. Salah satu yang dipermasalahkan oleh pemohon adalah adanya Pasal 55 ayat (2) UU Perbankan Syariah, sebagaimana diketahui dalam Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) tersebut dimungkinkannya penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah diselesaikan melalui proses peradilan umum. Pada akhirnya dalam Sidang Pleno MK terbuka untuk umum pada tanggal 29 Agustus 2013 menyatakan Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) UU Perbankan Syariah bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945 (inkonstitusionalitas) dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang mengikat. Penafsiran hukum yang digunakan oleh MK dalam Putusan Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 akhirnya membentuk keadilan legal (iustitia legalis) yang menghasilkan penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah harus melalui peradilan agama. Tulisan ini akan mencari untuk mengetahui metode penafsiran hukum apa yang digunakan dalam Putusan Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 yang menyatakan Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) UU Perbankan Syariah bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945 serta tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang mengikat dan telah membentuk keadilan legal dalam penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah.Kata kunci: keadilan legal, penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah, kekuatan hukum mengikat. ABSTRACTIslamic Banking Law regulates specifically on finance and banking with respect to the principles of Islamic Banking, for the reason that the applicable conventional banking law has not thoroughly set rules on Islamic Banking. On the other hand, there is a filing of a constitutional review for Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 to the Constitutional Court concerning Islamic Banking Law. One of the issues disputed by the Applicant is the Article 55 paragraph (2) of the Islamic Banking Law, specifically in the elucidation stating that any dispute on Islamic Banking is possible to be resolved in the courts of general jurisdiction. At last on 29 August 2013, the case was openly heard at Plenary Session at the Constitutional Court, to issue that the elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of the Islamic Banking Law contradicts the 1945 Constitution (unconstitutionality) and has no binding legal force. Legal interpretation used in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 as a final point establishes legal justice (justitia legalis) which stipulates that the Islamic Banking dispute settlement must be decided in the religious court This analysis is discussing what legal interpretation methods used in Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 stating the elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of the Islamic Banking Law is contrary to the 1945 Constitution, and not legally binding, thusestablishing legal justice in Islamic Banking dispute settlement.Keywords: legal justice (justitia legalis), Islamic banking dispute settlement, legally binding.

Peran Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Untuk Menentukan Kebijakan Pokok dalam Negara Kesejahteraan di Indonesia Iskandar Muda
DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Diversi Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM KADIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/diversi.v7i1.1164

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis peran Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk menentukan lima kebijakan pokok dalam negara kesejahteraan di Indonesia berdasarkan putusannya. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan terdapat peran Mahkamah Konstitusi ketika memutus perkara uji konstitusional lima Undang-Undang terkait lima kebijakan pokok dalam negara kesejahteraan; yaitu: perkara uji konstitusional Undang-Undang: (i) Ketenagakerjaan, (ii) Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, (iii) Kesehatan, (iv) Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial, dan (v) Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman.

Title

Found 14 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 14 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 14 Documents
Search