Reko Dwi Salfutra
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016 bagi Orang Lom di Kepulauan Bangka Belitung Reko Dwi Salfutra; Dwi Haryadi; Darwance Darwance
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (418.505 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1623

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016 tentang Pengujian terhadap Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan merupakan suatu bentuk regulasi yang dimunculkan untuk memberikan pengakuan dan perlindungan dalam kebebasan untuk memilih dan memeluk agama yang diyakini, termasuk bagi Orang Lom di Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. Tulisan ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaji implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut serta persoalan yang mempengaruhinya. Hasil penelitian membuktikan: pertama, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut tidak dapat diimplementasi dalam pengisian kolom agama bagi Orang Lom dalam pembuatan Kartu Tanda Penduduk elektronik (KTP-el); kedua, terdapat berbagai faktor penyebab Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut tidak dapat diimplementasi, mulai dari persoalan regulasi turunan sebagai peraturan teknis, tidak dilakukannya sosialisasi, sistem aplikasi perekaman KTP-el, sampai pada persoalan budaya dan masyarakat. Oleh sebab itu, diperlukan suatu bentuk langkah konkret dan nyata yang dilakukan untuk mengakomodir persoalan pencantuman “penghayat kepercayaan” pada KTP-el bagi Orang Lom.The Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 is a form of regulation that is raised to provide recognition and protection in the freedom to choose and embrace the religion that is believed, including for Orang Lom in Bangka Belitung. this paper is intended to examine the implementation of that Constitutional Court Decision and it’s legal problems. This research proved that: first, the Constitutional Court Decision cannot be implemented in filling out the religious column on the making electronic ID Card for Orang Lom. Second, there are various factors causing the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision, starting from the issue of derivative regulation as a technical regulation, the absence of sosialization, application systems, culture and society factors. Therefore, needed the concrete efforts to accommodate the issue of inclusion of trustees in the making of the electronic ID Card for Orang Lom.
Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016 bagi Orang Lom di Kepulauan Bangka Belitung Reko Dwi Salfutra; Dwi Haryadi; Darwance Darwance
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (418.505 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1623

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016 tentang Pengujian terhadap Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan merupakan suatu bentuk regulasi yang dimunculkan untuk memberikan pengakuan dan perlindungan dalam kebebasan untuk memilih dan memeluk agama yang diyakini, termasuk bagi Orang Lom di Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. Tulisan ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaji implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut serta persoalan yang mempengaruhinya. Hasil penelitian membuktikan: pertama, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut tidak dapat diimplementasi dalam pengisian kolom agama bagi Orang Lom dalam pembuatan Kartu Tanda Penduduk elektronik (KTP-el); kedua, terdapat berbagai faktor penyebab Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut tidak dapat diimplementasi, mulai dari persoalan regulasi turunan sebagai peraturan teknis, tidak dilakukannya sosialisasi, sistem aplikasi perekaman KTP-el, sampai pada persoalan budaya dan masyarakat. Oleh sebab itu, diperlukan suatu bentuk langkah konkret dan nyata yang dilakukan untuk mengakomodir persoalan pencantuman “penghayat kepercayaan” pada KTP-el bagi Orang Lom.The Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 is a form of regulation that is raised to provide recognition and protection in the freedom to choose and embrace the religion that is believed, including for Orang Lom in Bangka Belitung. this paper is intended to examine the implementation of that Constitutional Court Decision and it’s legal problems. This research proved that: first, the Constitutional Court Decision cannot be implemented in filling out the religious column on the making electronic ID Card for Orang Lom. Second, there are various factors causing the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision, starting from the issue of derivative regulation as a technical regulation, the absence of sosialization, application systems, culture and society factors. Therefore, needed the concrete efforts to accommodate the issue of inclusion of trustees in the making of the electronic ID Card for Orang Lom.
EKSISTENSI BANTUAN HUKUM KEPADA TERSANGKA TERHADAP PELANGGARAN HAM YANG DILAKUKAN POLISI Reko Dwi Salfutra
Law Journal (LAJOUR) Vol 1 No 1 (2020): Law Journal (LAJOUR) Oktober 2020
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Insan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32767/law.v1i1.38

Abstract

Legal aid is an institution that supports juridical support for law enforcement agreements, mostly in order to accompany justice seekers in fighting for rights. The method of choosing normative law because it discusses the rules of invitation, literature, and journals as well as papers relating to the material examined, which consists of the type of data obtained in this study is secondary data that is data obtained from library research and documentation, which is the result of research and the processing of other people, which are already available in the form of literature or documentation in this legal aid, there is a collection of experts or legal experts related to their expertise, legal issues relating to someone involved in the problem or seek help, can be used or fought for. The phenomenon of seizing human rights perpetrated by the police during arrests and checks is still common. The closest police officer filed a lawsuit against violations, the police only evaded, committed acts of self-defense or prevented the suspect from escaping.