Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi
Sutan Sorik
Pusat Penelitian Politik-Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (P2P-LIPI)
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Eksistensi Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 01/MKMK/X/2013) Sutan Sorik; Mirza Nasution; Nazaruddin Nazaruddin
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (368.686 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk15310

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas tentang eksistensi Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebebasan Hakim Konstitusi untuk menjalankan fungsi, kewenangan, serta kewajibannya merupakan hal yang mutlak harus dimiliki Hakim Konstitusi. Akan tetapi demi menjamin kehormatan, keluhuran martabat, dan kode etik Hakim Konstitusi, maka harus ada mekanisme pertanggungjawaban setiap perbuatan Hakim Konstitusi melalui pengawasan. Hal ini dilakukan supaya kebebasan tersebut tidak disalahgunakan menjadi tameng hukum oleh Hakim Konstitusi. Studi ini juga berhasil mengkonfirmasi bahwa Keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 01/MKMK/X/2013 yang menyatakan Hakim Terlapor H.M. Akil Mochtar terbukti melakukan pelanggaran Kode Etik dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi, dengan menjatuhkan sanksi pemberhentian tidak dengan hormat, telah memberikan kepastian hukum dan kejelasan lembaga pengawas perilaku Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi. Sehingga anggapan tirani yudisial, dan tirani kekuasaan kehakiman yang dijalankan Mahkamah Konstitusi secara monopolistik tidak benar-benar terjadi di Mahkamah Konstitusi.This study discusses the existence of the Constitutional Court Honorary Council. The method used in this study is normative juridical, with a decision analysis approach of the Constitutional Court Honorary Council Number 01/MKMK/X/2013. From the analysis, it is known that the freedom of Constitutional Judges to carry out their functions, authorities, and obligations is an absolute requirement for Constitutional Judges. However, in order to guarantee the honor, dignity and ethics code of the Constitutional Justices, there must be a mechanism of accountability for every act of the Constitutional Justice through supervision. This is done so that freedom is not misused to be a legal shield by a Constitutional Judge. This study also succeeded in confirming that the Decision of the Constitutional Court Honorary Assembly Number 01/MKMK/X/2013 stated the Reported Judge H.M. Akil Mochtar was proven to have violated the Code of Ethics and Behavior of Constitutional Judges, by not sanctioning dismissal with respect, has provided legal certainty and clarity of the supervisory body of the conduct of the Judge of the Constitutional Court. So that the assumption of judicial tyranny, and the tyranny of the judicial power exercised by the Constitutional Court are monopolistically not true in the Constitutional Court.
Menata Ulang Relasi Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dan Presiden Melalui Politik Hukum Haluan Negara Sutan Sorik; Dian Aulia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (335.986 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1727

Abstract

This study discusses the relationship between the MPR and the President in the formation, establishment and accountability of achieving national development. The research method used in this study is qualitative, with normative juridical type of research. The results of the study indicate that post-national development reform is not based on concrete guidelines as outlined in the State Policy. Development is carried out by the President and Vice President elected by referring to the vision and mission at the time of nominating the presidential and vice presidential elections. So that national development often experiences political conflicts that cause unsustainable national development, it is also due to the absence of state institutions that are able to fully control the achievement of national development plans and their accountability. Therefore, the arrangement of relations between the MPR and the President should have been carried out. Ideally, it is expected that the MPR and the President will work together in making and setting the country’s direction. The MPR and the President must coordinate with the principle of checks and balances. So that the goal of forming an Indonesian government listed in the fourth paragraph of the opening of the 1945 Constitution can be achieved.
Eksistensi Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 01/MKMK/X/2013) Sutan Sorik; Mirza Nasution; Nazaruddin Nazaruddin
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (368.686 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk15310

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas tentang eksistensi Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebebasan Hakim Konstitusi untuk menjalankan fungsi, kewenangan, serta kewajibannya merupakan hal yang mutlak harus dimiliki Hakim Konstitusi. Akan tetapi demi menjamin kehormatan, keluhuran martabat, dan kode etik Hakim Konstitusi, maka harus ada mekanisme pertanggungjawaban setiap perbuatan Hakim Konstitusi melalui pengawasan. Hal ini dilakukan supaya kebebasan tersebut tidak disalahgunakan menjadi tameng hukum oleh Hakim Konstitusi. Studi ini juga berhasil mengkonfirmasi bahwa Keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 01/MKMK/X/2013 yang menyatakan Hakim Terlapor H.M. Akil Mochtar terbukti melakukan pelanggaran Kode Etik dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi, dengan menjatuhkan sanksi pemberhentian tidak dengan hormat, telah memberikan kepastian hukum dan kejelasan lembaga pengawas perilaku Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi. Sehingga anggapan tirani yudisial, dan tirani kekuasaan kehakiman yang dijalankan Mahkamah Konstitusi secara monopolistik tidak benar-benar terjadi di Mahkamah Konstitusi.This study discusses the existence of the Constitutional Court Honorary Council. The method used in this study is normative juridical, with a decision analysis approach of the Constitutional Court Honorary Council Number 01/MKMK/X/2013. From the analysis, it is known that the freedom of Constitutional Judges to carry out their functions, authorities, and obligations is an absolute requirement for Constitutional Judges. However, in order to guarantee the honor, dignity and ethics code of the Constitutional Justices, there must be a mechanism of accountability for every act of the Constitutional Justice through supervision. This is done so that freedom is not misused to be a legal shield by a Constitutional Judge. This study also succeeded in confirming that the Decision of the Constitutional Court Honorary Assembly Number 01/MKMK/X/2013 stated the Reported Judge H.M. Akil Mochtar was proven to have violated the Code of Ethics and Behavior of Constitutional Judges, by not sanctioning dismissal with respect, has provided legal certainty and clarity of the supervisory body of the conduct of the Judge of the Constitutional Court. So that the assumption of judicial tyranny, and the tyranny of the judicial power exercised by the Constitutional Court are monopolistically not true in the Constitutional Court.
Menata Ulang Relasi Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dan Presiden Melalui Politik Hukum Haluan Negara Sutan Sorik; Dian Aulia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (335.986 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1727

Abstract

This study discusses the relationship between the MPR and the President in the formation, establishment and accountability of achieving national development. The research method used in this study is qualitative, with normative juridical type of research. The results of the study indicate that post-national development reform is not based on concrete guidelines as outlined in the State Policy. Development is carried out by the President and Vice President elected by referring to the vision and mission at the time of nominating the presidential and vice presidential elections. So that national development often experiences political conflicts that cause unsustainable national development, it is also due to the absence of state institutions that are able to fully control the achievement of national development plans and their accountability. Therefore, the arrangement of relations between the MPR and the President should have been carried out. Ideally, it is expected that the MPR and the President will work together in making and setting the country’s direction. The MPR and the President must coordinate with the principle of checks and balances. So that the goal of forming an Indonesian government listed in the fourth paragraph of the opening of the 1945 Constitution can be achieved.
Co-Authors Dian Aulia Mirza Nasution Nazaruddin Nazaruddin