Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi
Aminoto Aminoto
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kebijakan Impor Indonesia Atas Produk Hewan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 129/PUU-XIII/2015 Irna Nurhayati; Aminoto Aminoto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (415.722 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1917

Abstract

This article examines on how Indonesia’s import policy on animal products after the decision of Constitutional Court Number 129/PUU-XIII/2015 should be improved in accordance with the legislation formation and international trade rule. This article was based on normative juridical research supported by interviews with several officials of the Indonesian Ministry of Trade in Jakarta, and focus group discussion with some academics of the Universitas Gadjah Mada in Yogyakarta. The data were analyzed qualitatively using inductive approach. This article concludes that this Indonesia’s import policy is consistent with the formal principle of regulation formation, but does not fully comply with the substantive principle. This Indonesia’s import policy is in accordance with the regionalization and harmonization principles of the WTO SPS Agreement. However, it seems to be inconsistent with Article XI.1 GATT, because it requires certain conditions categorized as quantitative restrictions.
Kebijakan Impor Indonesia Atas Produk Hewan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 129/PUU-XIII/2015 Irna Nurhayati; Aminoto Aminoto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1917

Abstract

This article examines on how Indonesia’s import policy on animal products after the decision of Constitutional Court Number 129/PUU-XIII/2015 should be improved in accordance with the legislation formation and international trade rule. This article was based on normative juridical research supported by interviews with several officials of the Indonesian Ministry of Trade in Jakarta, and focus group discussion with some academics of the Universitas Gadjah Mada in Yogyakarta. The data were analyzed qualitatively using inductive approach. This article concludes that this Indonesia’s import policy is consistent with the formal principle of regulation formation, but does not fully comply with the substantive principle. This Indonesia’s import policy is in accordance with the regionalization and harmonization principles of the WTO SPS Agreement. However, it seems to be inconsistent with Article XI.1 GATT, because it requires certain conditions categorized as quantitative restrictions.
Implications of Conditional Inconstitutional Decisions in The Constitutional Court Decision: Implikasi Putusan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Irna Nurhayati; Aminoto Aminoto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2014

Abstract

This research focuses on the decision of Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which states that Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation is unconstitutional because of a formal flaw in its formation. This study aims to answer two questions. First, regarding the development and characteristics of conditional decisions issued by the Constitutional Court. Second, what are the implications of conditional unconstitutional decisions issued by the Constitutional Court in Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020? The research method used is doctrinal legal research with a secondary database. The research results show; (1) there are two types of conditional decisions at the Constitutional Court: conditional constitutional decisions and conditional unconstitutional decisions. (2) Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 can potentially cause an ambiguous interpretation regarding conditional unconstitutionality because the Constitutional Court, in its a quo decision, stated that Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation remains valid. When referring to the conditional unconstitutional meaning generally understood, the law should be unconstitutional until the amendments are completed.
Co-Authors Irna Nurhayati