Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi
Sakirman Sakirman
Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Metro, Lampung
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Telaah Hermenutika Pasal 211 KHI dalam Memberikan Access to Justice terkait Hibah dan Waris Sakirman Sakirman
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (400.78 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1515

Abstract

Pada dasarnya konsep pembagian harta warisan dalam Islam dilaksanakan ketika pewaris telah meninggal dunia. Namun, pada praktiknya banyak terjadi bahwa kewarisan dilaksanakan oleh pewaris dalam hal ini adalah orang tua kepada anaknya ketika orang tua masih hidup dengan menggunakan usaha alternatif berupa hibah. Hal ini telah diberikan legalisasi dengan dirumuskannya Pasal 211 dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam, yang seakan memberikan legalisasi terhadap praktik kewarisan dengan menabrak ortodoksi konsep kewarisan Islam yang sudah baku. Tulisan ini hadir untuk menelaah substansi dan menakar nilai-nilai hukum yang termaktub dalam Pasal 211 Kompilasi Hukum Islam dengan menggunakan pendekatan hermenutika hukum. Sehingga, permasalahan pokok dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana hibah orang tua kepada anak sebagai pengganti waris menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam dalam Pasal 211. Hasil akhir dari tulisan yang tidak bersifat final ini menunjukan bahwa pembagian harta hibah sebagai pengganti waris kepada anak dilatarbelakangi atas perkembangan hukum Islam. Potret hukum Islam tidak terlepas dari wacana pembaharuan hukum Islam menuju hukum yang berkeadilan.Basically the concept of division of inheritance in Islam is executed when the heir has passed away. In practice, however, much of the inheritance exercised by the testator in this case is the parent to the child when the parent is alive by using an alternate venture. This has been legalized by the formulation of Article 211 in the Compilation of Islamic Law, which seems to provide legalization of inheritance practices by bumping into the orthodoxy of a standard Islamic inheritance concept. This paper is present to examine the substance and measure the legal values contained in Article 211 of the Compilation of Islamic Law by using a legal hermeneutic approach. Thus, the main issue in this paper is how the parent grants to the child as a substitute for inheritance according to the Compilation of Islamic Law in article 211. The final result of this non-final writing shows that the distribution of grant property as a substitute for inheritance to the child is motivated by the development of Islamic law. Portrait of Islamic law can not be separated from the discourse of Islamic law reform to law of justice.
Analisis Konstitusionalitas Batasan Kewenangan Presiden dalam Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Sakirman Sakirman
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.422 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1733

Abstract

This paper is directed to notice about the limits of authority formation Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) as outlined in Article 22 of the Indonesia Constitution 1945 as the excesses of the state that are considered critical and pushy or in legal terminology often referred to as matters of urgency to force. Nevertheless, the existence of Article 22 Indonesia Constitution 1945 as the legal basis of the authority of the President in the form Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) not provide any legal certainty regarding presidential authority limits in the PERPU formation. The nature of subjectivity strengthened in the President becomes a problem and the pros and cons in any talks regarding the formation of this Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) by using the methodology of normative legal research and the study of literature and used conseptional approach. On conclusion that there are three (3) main principal requirement Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) their formation performed by the President based on the provisions of Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution and the law analisan results in this paper. These three things first is the limitation of time (when) a Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) which by Maria Farida is limited (temporary) and limits the material (substance) were interpreted in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 138 / PUU-VII / 2009 as well as limits to the protection of the constitutional rights of the people.
Telaah Hermenutika Pasal 211 KHI dalam Memberikan Access to Justice terkait Hibah dan Waris Sakirman Sakirman
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (400.78 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1515

Abstract

Pada dasarnya konsep pembagian harta warisan dalam Islam dilaksanakan ketika pewaris telah meninggal dunia. Namun, pada praktiknya banyak terjadi bahwa kewarisan dilaksanakan oleh pewaris dalam hal ini adalah orang tua kepada anaknya ketika orang tua masih hidup dengan menggunakan usaha alternatif berupa hibah. Hal ini telah diberikan legalisasi dengan dirumuskannya Pasal 211 dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam, yang seakan memberikan legalisasi terhadap praktik kewarisan dengan menabrak ortodoksi konsep kewarisan Islam yang sudah baku. Tulisan ini hadir untuk menelaah substansi dan menakar nilai-nilai hukum yang termaktub dalam Pasal 211 Kompilasi Hukum Islam dengan menggunakan pendekatan hermenutika hukum. Sehingga, permasalahan pokok dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana hibah orang tua kepada anak sebagai pengganti waris menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam dalam Pasal 211. Hasil akhir dari tulisan yang tidak bersifat final ini menunjukan bahwa pembagian harta hibah sebagai pengganti waris kepada anak dilatarbelakangi atas perkembangan hukum Islam. Potret hukum Islam tidak terlepas dari wacana pembaharuan hukum Islam menuju hukum yang berkeadilan.Basically the concept of division of inheritance in Islam is executed when the heir has passed away. In practice, however, much of the inheritance exercised by the testator in this case is the parent to the child when the parent is alive by using an alternate venture. This has been legalized by the formulation of Article 211 in the Compilation of Islamic Law, which seems to provide legalization of inheritance practices by bumping into the orthodoxy of a standard Islamic inheritance concept. This paper is present to examine the substance and measure the legal values contained in Article 211 of the Compilation of Islamic Law by using a legal hermeneutic approach. Thus, the main issue in this paper is how the parent grants to the child as a substitute for inheritance according to the Compilation of Islamic Law in article 211. The final result of this non-final writing shows that the distribution of grant property as a substitute for inheritance to the child is motivated by the development of Islamic law. Portrait of Islamic law can not be separated from the discourse of Islamic law reform to law of justice.
Analisis Konstitusionalitas Batasan Kewenangan Presiden dalam Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Sakirman Sakirman
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.422 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1733

Abstract

This paper is directed to notice about the limits of authority formation Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) as outlined in Article 22 of the Indonesia Constitution 1945 as the excesses of the state that are considered critical and pushy or in legal terminology often referred to as matters of urgency to force. Nevertheless, the existence of Article 22 Indonesia Constitution 1945 as the legal basis of the authority of the President in the form Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) not provide any legal certainty regarding presidential authority limits in the PERPU formation. The nature of subjectivity strengthened in the President becomes a problem and the pros and cons in any talks regarding the formation of this Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) by using the methodology of normative legal research and the study of literature and used conseptional approach. On conclusion that there are three (3) main principal requirement Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) their formation performed by the President based on the provisions of Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution and the law analisan results in this paper. These three things first is the limitation of time (when) a Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) which by Maria Farida is limited (temporary) and limits the material (substance) were interpreted in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 138 / PUU-VII / 2009 as well as limits to the protection of the constitutional rights of the people.
Co-Authors