Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Etika Respons Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Filsafat Dialogia: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial Jurnal Konstitusi International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities (IJMESH)
Hasan, Sunaryo
Department Philosophy And Religion Studies, Paramadina University
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Konsep Fairness John Rawls, Kritik dan Relevansinya Sunaryo Sunaryo
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (382.032 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1911

Abstract

Justice is very fundamental in a pluralistic society. Rawls's view of justice, which is understood as fairness, tries to offer how we organize a pluralistic society fairly. This view is crucial to be considered. The concept of fairness is understood as the ability to act that is acceptable and supported reciprocally. In Rawls's view, the existence of mutual acceptance and support from free and equal citizens without intimidation and pressure signifies that the agreement is fair. He called this kind of attitude reasonableness. In a just society, people must be able to act reasonably. With this capacity, they will agree on the principles of justice, which will be the basis of their social unity. The concept of fairness is essential for a pluralistic society like Indonesia. If we fail to bring justice in a pluralistic society, then our unity as a society will be under serious threat.
Kritik Amartya Sen atas Teori Keadilan John Rawls: Kritik Pendekatan Komparatif atas Pendekatan Institusionalisme Sunaryo Hasan
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 23, No 01 (2018): Respons
Publisher : Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (136.541 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This article shows Amartya Sen’s criticism to John Rawls’ theory of justice. The main criticism is Rawls’ institutionalism approach in his theory of justice. This approach, Sen traces, is based on contractarian paradigm. By this paradigm, perspective of justice is limitted in citizenship contract. A person deserves justice as far as he is citizen. In this perspective, collective decision is only based on those which are citizen. Sen called this paradigm closed impartiality, not open impartiality. Whereas his idea of justice is much broader and beyond the limit of citizenship. If we think about justice, it is not only just for those who are bound in citizenship contract, but also for those who are not. His other criticism is about asumption in theory of justice, which is perfect justice. Sen say that comparative justice does not try to make a perfect justice in this world. What the term is trying is to make life of people less unjust than before. KEYWORDS: Institusionalisme, komparatif, hal-hal pokok, perilaku aktual, niti, nyaya, less unjust
Meninjau Kembali Hubungan Agama dan Politik dalam Kerangka Demokrasi dan Keadilan Sunaryo Sunaryo
Dialogia Vol 18, No 2 (2020): DIALOGIA JURNAL STUDI ISLAM DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : IAIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/dialogia.v18i2.2032

Abstract

Abstract: Through this article, I try to revisit the relationship between religion and politics. There are three main ideas I propose here. First, about the nature and function of religion for human beings. Once, many scholars have predicted that religion would disappear from human life that was increasingly modernized and rationalized. But in fact, religion has not really disappeared. The prediction is wrong because it is not based on the nature of human beings who always have a desire for the Transcendent. Secondly, in the history of secularization in Europe that has been going on for several centuries, it did not completely nullify religion from public life. Religion is still present in forms that have been adjusted to democratic values. Some religious symbols are also still used. Third, I don’t argue that religion needs to be incorporated into politics. What I want to deliver here is that we need to see the relationship proportionately. Religious groups have the right to propose their religious views in the public sphere. But at the same time, they need to develop reasonable arguments. They should translate their religious values to be compatible with the values of democracy and justice in a pluralistic society.
Konsep Fairness John Rawls, Kritik dan Relevansinya Sunaryo Sunaryo
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1911

Abstract

Justice is very fundamental in a pluralistic society. Rawls's view of justice, which is understood as fairness, tries to offer how we organize a pluralistic society fairly. This view is crucial to be considered. The concept of fairness is understood as the ability to act that is acceptable and supported reciprocally. In Rawls's view, the existence of mutual acceptance and support from free and equal citizens without intimidation and pressure signifies that the agreement is fair. He called this kind of attitude reasonableness. In a just society, people must be able to act reasonably. With this capacity, they will agree on the principles of justice, which will be the basis of their social unity. The concept of fairness is essential for a pluralistic society like Indonesia. If we fail to bring justice in a pluralistic society, then our unity as a society will be under serious threat.
Natural Resource Policy Through Capability Approach: Case of Coal Mining and Palm Oil Industry in Indonesia Sunaryo Sunaryo; Ika Karlina
International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): December 2019
Publisher : Research Synergy Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (192.897 KB) | DOI: 10.31098/ijmesh.v2i2.15

Abstract

This article can be seen as a ‘moral’ evaluation to the most important of natural resource sectors in Indonesia, namely the coal mining sector and palm oil plantations through the capability approach as formulated by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. These two sectors are important because they have a large contribution to state revenue, but unfortunately, at the same time, both also have a large contribution to the destruction of the environment, health and conflict in society, which are very important to support the quality of human life. Through this approach, I hold that for coal mining, even though it makes a large contribution to state revenue, the losses received related to the things that support the quality of human life are far greater. Therefore, for this sector, it is a good thing for the government to make a significant reduction by developing the mining process which is environmentally friendly and does not damage the quality of the healthy life of the people in the area. While the palm oil industry is basically not as bad as coal mining. But this industry has contributed to deforestation in Indonesia and damaged biodiversity. In this sector, the government also needs to look for the development of the palm oil plantation industry that is more environmentally friendly.
Habermas’ Concept of “Lebenswelt” and System and Its Implication for the Position of Religion in Public Life Sunaryo Sunaryo
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 33, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.82237

Abstract

The concept of “Lebenswelt” (the lifeworld) and the system are essential in Jürgen Habermas's thought. Habermas understands Lebenswelt as background knowledge that people take for granted naively. It becomes the horizon of their daily communication. He emphasizes the importance of coupling Lebenswelt and system. The uncoupling will make society get loss of meaning. Then we ask how he understands the position of religion in public life. How should we place religion as a part of Lebenswelt in making public law? To answer the question, we did the library research by exploring Habermas's works and his commentators. Then I conclude that Habermas offers accommodative participation to religion in public life through discourse. In the discourse, views inspired by religion can be put forward in the public sphere as far as they undergo a rationalization process. They should be openly discussed and tested instead of being taken for granted naively. Views inspired by religion will be accepted as long as they are rational. Discourse practice requires religious groups to be more mature and rational in formulating their ideas in the public sphere. Religious ideas are no longer positioned as closed and anti-criticism.
Co-Authors Ika Karlina