Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi

KEMISKINAN DALAM PEMBANGUNAN Solikatun Solikatun; Yulia Masruroh; ahmad zuber
Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi Vol 3, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET (UNS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (389.424 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/jas.v3i1.17450

Abstract

Dalam pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 telah tercantum tujuanpembangunan nasional yaitu untuk mewujudkan suatu masyarakat adil danmakmur, material, dan spiritual berdasarkan Pancasila, di dalam wadahnegara kesatuan republik Indonesia yang merdeka, berdaulat, dan bersatu,dalam suasana perikehidupan bangsa yang damai, tentram, tertib, dandinamis, serta dalam lingkungan pergaulan hidup dunia yang merdeka,bersahabat, tertib, dan damai. Namun Maraknya kegiatan dan perencanaanpembangunan belum sepenuhnya mampu mensejahterakan bangsa danNegara. Pembangunan di berbagai sektor juga belum dapat menampung danmemenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat. Dapat kita lihat bahwa hingga kinimasalah kemiskinan belum bisa di tanggulangi dengan baik. Bahkansemakin maraknya pembangunan semakin menambah deret kemiskinan dinegeri ini. Ketidak sesuaian antara tujuan pembangunan dengan realitayang terjadi di lapangan dapat menimbulkan berbagai masalah. Perencanaandan program pembanguan belum dapat menanggulangi kemiskinan diNegara Indonesia. Selain itu munculnya berbagai faktor yangmempengaruhi kegagalan penanggulangan kemiskinan. Karena itudibutuhkan strategi pembangunan yang tepat guna menanggulangikemiskinan di Negara Indonesia.Keywords: Program Pembangunan, Kemiskinan.
PERANAN MODAL SOSIAL BAGI PETANI MISKIN UNTUK MEMPERTAHANKAN KELANGSUNGAN HIDUP RUMAH TANGGA DI PEDESAAN NGAWI (STUDI KASUS DI DESA RANDUSONGO KECAMATAN GERIH KABUPATEN NGAWI PROVINSI JAWA TIMUR) Saheb Saheb; Yulius Slamet; Ahmad Zuber
Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi Vol 2, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET (UNS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (790.977 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/jas.v2i1.17382

Abstract

This study was a descriptive qualitative research aiming to describe the role of Social Capital for the poor farmer to sustain their household life. The subject of research consisted of poor farmers having a less-than-0.13 ha land conducted in RT 4 RW 6 Bulu II Hamlet, Randusongo Village, Gerih Subdistrict, Ngawi Regency, East Java Province.This study was conducted using in-depth interview, observation, and library study techniques. Meanwhile, the sampling technique used was maximum variation sampling taken seven informants as the sample, consisting of four informants: poor old, very poor old, poor young, and very poor young farmers, as the case informant, while the key informant of research consisted of: elders of Randusongo Village, Carik/Secretary of Randusongo Village, and Head of Bulu II Hamlet. Key informant was also used as the instrument of validating the field data from the informant.The case informants were selected based on the criterion specified by Statistical Central Agency (BPS), that was, those belonging to poor family, while key informants were the village elders considered as knowledgeable and understanding about the daily condition of poor farmers because they domiciled in the same hamlet, and the village apparatus considered as knowing the poor farmers’ condition because they often gave them service regarding Bantuan Langsung Tunai ((BLT= Cash Direct Grant) now called Bantuan Langsung Sementara Masyarakat (BLSM = Temporary Public Grant), Raskin (rice for poor people) and other services.The result showed that bonding social capital played an important role for the poor farmers in sustaining their household life. It could be seen from those helping their poor close relatives in meeting their daily life needs. Bridging social capital is the strongest out of the three social capitals existing because many poor farmer household could survive because of their close neighbor’s help. Linking social capital did not play a role at al because such organization as PKK (Pendidikan Kesejahteraan Keluarga = Family Welfare Education) or organization at either RT or RW level in Randusongo village did not work thereby could not contribute to reinforcing social capital within the society. Keywords : social capital, poor farmer, life sustainability