Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Jurnal Cita Hukum STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law
Abu Tamrin
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

 1 
Tinjauan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Terhadap Praktik Penerapan Honorarium Notaris Abdul Manan; Abu Tamrin; Muhamad Nuzul Wibawa
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i1.11907

Abstract

Abstract The practice of applying a Notary honorarium that is not in accordance with Law Number 2 of  2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position, that a Notary has set a tariff below the standard. This study uses empirical normative methods, literature studies and case approaches. The results of the sutdy show that the practice of applying Notary honorariums tha are not in accordance with Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 2004 concerning Notary Position, in practice that Notaries have violated the provisions of Article 13 Paragraph (3), Article 4 Paragraph (9), and Article 4 Paragraph (10) Notary Code of Ethics, and sanctions that can be imposed on Notaries who do not apply honorarium according to Law Number 2 Year 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 Year 2004 concerning Notary Position stipulated in Article 6 Notary Code of Ethics.Keywords: Notary, Honorarium, Notary Supervisory Board
Perlindungan Hukum dalam Sengketa Merek BMW vs BMW Body Man Wear; Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 29.PK/PDT.SUS-HKI/2016 Risris Bayanillah; Abu Tamrin
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 4 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i4.12185

Abstract

Abstract:The main problem in this study is the analysis of the protection of well-known brands, especially in the element of equality that basically applies to non-similar goods. In addition to analyzing the consideration of judges Number 29 PK / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2016 which contains trademark disputes between BMW brands and BMW Body Man Wear. The research method uses a normative juridical approach. The results showed that the element of equality in principle applies to goods of different types because it is a principal element that exists in the legal order of the brand associated with the distinguishing power element that exists in a brand. The panel of judges in deciding this case considers SEMA Number 3 / BUA.6 / HS / SP / XII / 2015 which states that all cases of filing claims for cancellation of brands that have similarities in principle in non-similar goods, the lawsuit must be declared with amar 'is not acceptable 'because the Government Regulation mandated by Law Number 15 Year 2001 Concerning Trademarks has not yet been enacted.Keywords: Trademark Protection, Elemental Equality Principals, Decision Analysis 
Green Open Space Governance Strategy Against City Development in East Jakarta Mayor Perspective of Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning Pamungkas Alukman Nulhakim; Siti Ngainnur Rohmah; Abu Tamrin; Mufidah Mufidah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25602

Abstract

The existence of Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning spatial planning is a shared hope, both for the local government and the community in East Jakarta Municipality. Urban problems arise due to unclear urban spatial planning, as well as inconsistencies in environmental management. The purpose of this study is to explain the importance of managing urban spatial planning as a strategy for designing and developing environmentally friendly areas in East Jakarta Municipality based on Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning. The research method used is qualitative with a normative and empirical juridical approach. The results of the study found that one of the benchmarks for the application of the Green City concept is the existence of Green Open Space (RTH) in urban areas. Green Open Space in a city must meet a minimum area of 30% of the total land area, with a composition of 20% public green open space and 10% private green open space (Law No. 26 of 2007).
Rekonstruksi Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah Yang Bersertifikat Ganda Berbasis Keadilan; Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 54/G/2016/PTUN-SRG Naufal Akbar Alghifari; Abu Tamrin; Syafrudin Makmur
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i4.18123

Abstract

Jurnal ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis rekontruksi penyelesaian sengketa kepemilikan tanah yang bersertifikat ganda sesuia dengan study kasus putusan pengadilan tata usaha Negara serang yang bernomor : 54/G/ 2016 / PTUNSRG. Secara khusus skripsi ini mencoba membahas latar belakang, pertimbangan hukum yang ada dalam putusan. Disamping itu, skripsi ini juga membahas yang seharusnya dilakukan oleh setiap pihak yang bersengketa untuk mengakses keadilan yang lebih tepat dan cepat. Penelitian dalam jurnal ini mennggunakan pendekatan penelitian kepustakaan (library research) melalui pendekatan  perundang-undangan  (statute  approach) , Penelitian  ini  menggunakan metode  pengumpulan  data  berupa  studi  pustaka.  Melalui  studi  pustaka  peneliti mengumpulkan dokumen dan data untuk diolah menggunakan metode analisis isi. Hasil  penelitian  menunjukkan  bahwa Undang – undang dan hasil putusan yang mengatur untuk menyelesaikan sengketa kepemilikan tanah yang bersertifikat ganda dengan mengedepankan asas keadilan belum  memberikan kepastian hukum yang baik. Terbukti dengan adanya beberapa pasal dalam UU Agraria dan aturan dalam internal BPN yang masih menimbulkan pertanyaan soal penyelesaian sertifikat ganda di masa mendatang.
Perjanjian Franchise Antara Mysalon Dan Ratnasari Lukitaningrum (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.493/Pdt/2018/Pt.DKI) Shabriansyah, Rahmat Ivan; Tamrin, Abu
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v7i1.46861

Abstract

This study analyzes the breach of contract (wanprestatie) committed by a franchisee in executing the agreement established with the franchisor. The research adopts a statute approach combined with an analytical approach to examine the relevant legal provisions and their practical implications. The findings indicate that RL, as the franchisee, failed to fulfill contractual obligations under the agreement with MYSalon, the franchisor. Initially, MYSalon demonstrated good faith by summoning the franchisee and offering an opportunity to settle outstanding payment obligations. However, the franchisee refused to comply and instead unilaterally closed the MYSalon outlet under their management while filing a lawsuit before the South Jakarta District Court. To prevent the franchisor’s claim from becoming illusory and to ensure compensation for material losses, the franchisor requested the court to impose a conservatory attachment (conservatoir beslag) on all movable assets, equipment, and furniture owned by the franchisee across all managed outlets. Furthermore, the franchisor petitioned the court to prohibit the franchisee from using the MYSalon name and trademark, which legally belong to the franchisor.
Co-Authors Abdul Manan Ahmad Sujud Murtadlo Bening Setara Bulan Mufidah Mufidah Muhamad Nuzul Wibawa Naufal Akbar Alghifari Pamungkas Alukman Nulhakim Risris Bayanillah Rohmah, Siti Ngainnur Shabriansyah, Rahmat Ivan Sodikin Sodikin Syafrudin Makmur Yunus, Nur Rohim