Nurhasanah Nurhasanah
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Efektivitas Kekuatan Eksekutorial Pada Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dinda Laras Ayu Pratiwi; Andi Salman Maggalatung; Nurhasanah Nurhasanah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i1.19599

Abstract

This research contains an analysis of the considerations of the Constitutional Court in deciding the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 and the effectiveness of its implementation. This research uses the juridical-normative method and the legal material comes from the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/ 2019 and other decisions. The results of this research revealed that the decision was based on the principle of justice and legal certainty. The implementation itself has not been going well because there are still several unfulfilled factors.
Klausula Baku Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Tanpa Agunan Di Bank Permata; Studi Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Muhammad Fachri Akbar; Nurhasanah Nurhasanah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i2.13872

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to analyze the standard clauses in loan agreements without collateral in terms of consumer protection laws using the principles of the law approach and the theory of legal effectiveness. In addition, it aims to determine the response of credit users without collateral for the standard clause. The method used in this study is the Normative Law Research method. Normative Legal Research is a literature study using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This type of qualitative research requires a sample interview with several informants (credit users). The results of this study outline state that the standard clauses contained in the agreement to apply for Unsecured Loans at Permata Bank there are several points that violate the provisions regarding the standard clauses that have been stipulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection and Article 14 of the Regulations Bank Indonesia Number 16/1 / PBI / 2014 Regarding Consumer Protection for Payment System Services.Keywords: Standard Clause, Unsecured Loans, Agreements, Contracts 
Pembatalan Kontrak Sepihak Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Reza Ghovin Ankasa; Nurhasanah Nurhasanah; Ahmad Chaerul Hadi
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i3.21419

Abstract

The number of unilateral cancellations carried out by the Platform marketplace marketplace platform, which resulted in losses for consumers. The cancellation made by Platform marketplace is not without reason, but there are factors that cause the unilateral cancellation to occur. Platform marketplace then provides compensation in the form of vouchers to consumers but can only be used on the Platform marketplace platform so that consumers have limitations in using these rights. The unilateral cancellation by Platform marketplace in this study was reviewed using the Consumer Protection Act. This study aims to make consumers understand the factors that cause an order to be canceled and get accountability from Platform marketplace in accordance with the Consumer Protection Act. The method used in this research is normative research with library research type (library study) with normative juridical research methods. The main references used in the study are legislation, interviews with Platform marketplace consumers, and Platform marketplace standard agreements.
Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Market Leader Dalam Konteks Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Ammar Ichsan; Nurhasanah Nurhasanah; Indra Rahmatullah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 4 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i4.21559

Abstract

This research is motivated by the government's efforts to enforce business competition law by issuing Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning in Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. he existence of Law Number 5 of 1999 on the existing facts still raises several legal problems one of them is the extraterritorial framework. This research uses a normative -juridical approach where this research puts law as a norm building system. The norm system used in this research is based on the law regulation by Law Number 5 of 1999 and the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) case. The conclusion of this research indicates the description of the implementation of business competition law by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) based on the law regulation by Law Number 5 of 1999.
Discrepancy in the legislative regulations governing the education of advocates in Indonesia Nurhasanah Nurhasanah; Sayuti Sayuti; Mesut Idriz
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 11, No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v11i3.25988

Abstract

This paper aims to describe the legal confusion that arose after the Minister of Research and Technology of Higher Education Regulation No. 5 of 2019 on the Advocate Professional Program was passed. One of the clauses in this regulation has stipulated that the Advocate Education Program is organized by a tertiary institution that has the accreditation value “B” and collaborates with advocate organizations while the Constitutional Court Decision stipulates that Advocate Professional Special Education is organized by Advocate Organizations in collaboration with tertiary institutions that have the accreditation value “B”. In addition, the factors that cause the legal confusion and how it affects the advocate education after disharmony are also the focus of this article. To reveal the various legal perceptions related to this theme, the author uses a qualitative method with a juridical normative approach. The data and information can be had by data of library and the several articles related to up-to-date themes in Indonesia. The conclusion in the article is that the legal chaos that occurred was caused by the factor of sectoral ego, the law-making factor, the weakness of Legal education, and the accountability of Advocate Education Financing. second, the implementation of advocate education had not yet had the formulation and standards, both for the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, that it is all legal education in tertiary institutions and for the various advocate organizations. To anticipate the four issues that have been discussed, it is deemed necessary to conduct legal deliberations in providing win-win solutions.