Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

KEWENANGAN PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN (Analisis Perbandingan Antara Negara Indonesia Dengan Negara Prancis) Fathudin Fathudin; Annisa Hidayatush Sholikha; Ismail Hasani
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i1.21092

This study describes comparison problems of Judicial Reviews in Indonesia and France. Which is where in the comparison, there is an equation and Judicial Review of the Prevailing Laws. This study aims to determine the development of the Judicial Review in Indonesia and French. In particular, this thesis explores a method of Judicial Review between Indonesia and France. The results show that, in Indonesia, there are two institutions that carry out Judicial Review, namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. This is the basis for the comparison of Judicial Review with the French state, which in the French state is only carried out with one institution, namely the Constitutional Council. In general, the practice of Constitutionality contains various aspects such as institutional aspects, procedures and the nature of the decision. In the institutional context, a special institutionalization model is to form an institution such as the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. Then a model of testing by establishing a new body specifically but having a political character and not a judicial body was found in France with the Conseil Constitutionnel. The existence of a Constitutionality Review agency has implications for the procedural aspects and forms of testing it.

The Constitutionality of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law: Towards Overcoming SARA Conflict on Social Media Ismail Hasani; Halili Halili
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 4 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The subsistence of the Electronic Transaction and Information Law control and manage the illicit offenses related to the multiplication of concerns that hold Ethnicity, Religion, Race, and Intergroup (SARA) . Following the idea of law developed by practicality as a way of social regeneration. It is a legal normative investigation utilizing theoretical concurrence and laws. This research is a logical description by using qualitative information examination. The study revealed that content that contains SARA issues is referred to as a hatred statement, which can be construed as an act of communication, carried out by groups or individuals in the form of aggravation and endangered to throw the scandalous actor to prison for utmost six years and a fine of 1.000.000.000 rupiahs. Additionally, the accomplishment of the permissible authority of the Electronic Transaction and Information Law can be classified as non-implementation of the law authenticity establishment as shown from the culture that was not able to go after the rules made by law. It means that this law did not yet have a legal effect. This investigation advocates that society needs to behave by following the officially permitted rules, explained in the Electronic Transaction and Information Law.

Human Rights and Constitutionality Issues of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia Ismail Hasani; Halili Halili
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This article analyzes human rights and constitutionality issues in the Indonesian Blasphemy Law. It contributes urgently to constitutional studies since constitutionalism requires respect for human rights and democracy obliges to uphold the supremacy of the constitution. This article was written as the results of research through the desk-study using descriptive-qualitative approach. Data were collected through document study and Internal Focus Group Discussion. Indonesia's blasphemy laws inherently violate human rights and are prone to politicization which places religious minorities in vulnerability, while the main legal provisions that criminalize blasphemy have been tested for their constitutionality dimensions by the Constitutional Court. However, the constitutionality issue remains, partly because the Constitutional Court affirmed a religious constitution whereas the Republic of Indonesia is a Pancasila based state. In addition, the Constitutional Court ignores human rights, particularly the right to freedom of religion/belief as guaranteed by the constitution.

The Constitutionality of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law: Towards Overcoming SARA Conflict on Social Media Ismail Hasani; Halili Halili
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

The subsistence of the Electronic Transaction and Information Law control and manage the illicit offenses related to the multiplication of concerns that hold Ethnicity, Religion, Race, and Intergroup (SARA) . Following the idea of law developed by practicality as a way of social regeneration. It is a legal normative investigation utilizing theoretical concurrence and laws. This research is a logical description by using qualitative information examination. The study revealed that content that contains SARA issues is referred to as a hatred statement, which can be construed as an act of communication, carried out by groups or individuals in the form of aggravation and endangered to throw the scandalous actor to prison for utmost six years and a fine of 1.000.000.000 rupiahs. Additionally, the accomplishment of the permissible authority of the Electronic Transaction and Information Law can be classified as non-implementation of the law authenticity establishment as shown from the culture that was not able to go after the rules made by law. It means that this law did not yet have a legal effect. This investigation advocates that society needs to behave by following the officially permitted rules, explained in the Electronic Transaction and Information Law.

Human Rights and Constitutionality Issues of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia Ismail Hasani; Halili Halili
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1927

This article analyzes human rights and constitutionality issues in the Indonesian Blasphemy Law. It contributes urgently to constitutional studies since constitutionalism requires respect for human rights and democracy obliges to uphold the supremacy of the constitution. This article was written as the results of research through the desk-study using descriptive-qualitative approach. Data were collected through document study and Internal Focus Group Discussion. Indonesia's blasphemy laws inherently violate human rights and are prone to politicization which places religious minorities in vulnerability, while the main legal provisions that criminalize blasphemy have been tested for their constitutionality dimensions by the Constitutional Court. However, the constitutionality issue remains, partly because the Constitutional Court affirmed a religious constitution whereas the Republic of Indonesia is a Pancasila based state. In addition, the Constitutional Court ignores human rights, particularly the right to freedom of religion/belief as guaranteed by the constitution.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search