Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Bernard Nainggolan
Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Atas Pengangkatan Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris Yang Tidak Diberitahukan Kepada Menteri Hukum dan Ham Republik Indonesia Hemi Marihot Goldfirst Nainggolan; Tofik Yanuar Chandra; Bernard Nainggolan
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i1.25102

Abstract

The nomination of a Limited Liability Company's Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners must be informed to the Minister of Law and Human Rights, as specified in Articles 94 and 111 of Law No. 40 of 2007 respecting Limited Liability Companies. Following compliance with these criteria, the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners are effectively appointed externally and are authorized to enter into legal relationships with other parties. The research method employed is a normative juridical one, with a statutory, conceptual, and case-based approach. The study's findings indicated that the legal consequences for third parties of not notifying the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia about the appointment of the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners resulted in the cancellation of a legal relationship between a third-party and the Board of Directors and the establishment of legal protection for third parties, namely that a third party could sue the Board of Directors, the Board of Commissioners.
Eksistensi Pengurus Terkait Dengan Proses Pemberesan Kekayaan Yayasan Oleh Likuidator Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Fensky Readel Sumandag; Yuhelson Yuhelson; Bernard Nainggolan
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27915

Abstract

This study investigates the existence of a court-appointed board that serves as a liquidator. When the liquidator conducts the process of settling assets, problems occur if the Foundation's management is unwilling to work with the liquidator. The approach employed in this study is normative legal research, which is conducted in an effort to acquire the pertinent information regarding the issue. The qualitative juridical analysis method is utilized for data analysis. On the basis of Article 63 of the Foundation Law, the results of the study were obtained on the existence of the Management in the process of settling the assets of the Foundation by the liquidator. If the Foundation is dissolved because its time period and objectives have been met or not met, the Trustees appoint a liquidator; if the Trustees do not appoint a liquidator, the management acts as a liquidator; and if the Foundation is dissolved because of a court order, the court also appoints a liquidator. The court-appointed liquidator is authorized to dispose of the Foundation's assets. The nomination of the Management as Liquidator is inappropriate due to the fact that the liquidator is essentially a former member of the Foundation's management, which might cause conflict and impede the process of settling the Foundation's assets.
Akibat Hukum Actio Pauliana Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuat Notaris Dalam Perkara Kepailitan Kartika Sari; Bernard Nainggolan; Marni Emmy Musthofa
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 6 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v5i1.30909

Abstract

Notaris merupakan pejabat umum yang satu-satunya berwenang untuk membuat akta otentik mengenai semua perbuatan, perjanjian dan penetapan yang diharuskan oleh suatu peraturan umum atau oleh yang berkepentingan dikehendaki untuk dinyatakan dalam suatu akta otentik, menjamin kepastian tanggalnya, menyimpan aktanya dan memberikan grosse, Salinan dan kutipannya, semua sepanjang pembuatan akta itu oleh suatu peraturan umum tidak juga ditugaskan atau dikecualikan kepada pejabat atau orang lain. Dalam penelitian ini teknik analisa bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah analisis dengan penafsiran sistematis yakni untuk mengadakan identifikasi terhadap pengertian-pengertian, pokok/dasar dalam hukum, yakni masyarakat hukum, subyek hukum, hak dan kewajiban, peristiwa hukum, hubungan hukum dan obyek hukum. Dalam penelitian ini penulis membahas mengenai Actio pauliana hanya dapat dilakukan dan dilaksanakan berdasarkan putusan hakim pengadilan. Adanya gugatan Actio Pauliana sudah barang tentu didahulukan dengan adanya gugatan kepailitan.Kata Kunci: Notaris; Actio Pauliana; Kepailitan
Co-Authors Fensky Readel Sumandag Hemi Marihot Goldfirst Nainggolan Kartika Sari Marni Emmy Musthofa Tofik Yanuar Chandra Yuhelson Yuhelson