Abdul Hadi Martakusumah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Level of Knowledge about Hypertension in Cilayung Village District Jatinangor, Sumedang Dian Qisthi; Guswan Wiwaha; Abdul Hadi Martakusumah; Elsa Pudji Setiawati
Althea Medical Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (684.484 KB)

Abstract

  Background: Hypertension known as a silent killer because it is often asymptomatic and causes target organ damage. Prevention of hypertension and its complications are pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy, making holistic knowledge of hypertension is paramount to establish good behavior. This is needed by hypertensive and non-hypertensive individuals. Therefore, the study was conducted to identify any knowledge level differences between hypertensive and non-hypertensive groups. Methods: Respondents were 116 Cilayung residents equally divided in hypertensive and non-hypertensive groups. Respondent’s blood pressure was measured and they completed questionnaires during October 2012. This is an observational analytic cross-sectional study with chi-square test.Results: The respondents’ characteristics in both groups dominated by females, aged 50-59 years, housewives, with elementary school background. Most respondents in both groups had sufficient knowledge about hypertension in general, but for knowledge about risk factors, treatment, and complications were still not enough. The result of the chi-square test was not significant with P=0.676. It was due to distributed health promotion and non-matched respondents’age.Conclusion: There is no difference in level of knowledge about hypertension between both groups in Cilayung.Keywords: Differences, hypertension, level of knowledge DOI: 10.15850/amj.v2n1.449 
Comparison of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Mean Value of HARUS 15-30-60, HADI, and ASIAN Fomula Accuracy in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Sylvia Rachmayati; Ida Parwati; Abdul Hadi Martakusumah; Rachmat Soelaeman; Nanan Sekarwana
International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences Vol 3, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (125.712 KB)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy of HARUS 15-30-60, HADI, and Asian Formulas (Chinese-equation (Ch-E), Japanese-equation (Jp-E), and Thai- equation (Th-E)) for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).Methods: The Kidney Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has published a guideline to measure renal function, which is based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This procedure is complicated and expensive, therefore an estimated GFR (eGFR) has been proposed. The modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study prediction equation is the most frequently eGFR used. This method still have a weakness in accuracy, so the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula is developed. Since CKD-EPI is not practical for daily use, the MDRD is published for Asian population that includes Ch-E, Jp-E, and Th-E. In Indonesia, the MDRD formula has not been validated using any gold standard, therefore 2 new formulas have been developed, i.e. HARUS 15-30-60 and HADI formulas. In this study, we analyzed 102 medical records of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DMT2) patients who visited Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung during the period of 2012 to 2013. We analyzed the data using HARUS 15-30-60, HADI, Asian formulas, and then compared them to CKD-EPI to see the accuracy. Statistical analysis used was paired t-test in SPSS-17 program.Results: The accuracy of the different formulas are as follows: HADI (p=0.173), HARUS 15-30-60 (p=0.060), Ch-E (p=0.001), Th-E (p=0.000), and Jp-E (p=0.000).Conclusions: HADI is the most accurate formula, followed by HARUS Formula, Ch-E, and Th-E and Jp-E, respectively.Keywords: Chinese-equation, HADI and HARUS 15-30-60 formulas, Japanese-equation, and Thai-equation DOI: 10.15850/ijihs.v3n1.403