Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

The limitations of conducting collaborative argumentation when teaching argumentative essays in Malaysian secondary schools Aireen Aina Bahari; Haddi Junaidi Kussin; Raja Nor Safinas Raja Harun; Misrah Mohamed; Norfaizah Abdul Jobar
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 8, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

The writing of argumentative essays promotes higher-order thinking skills amongst students regardless of their level of studying only when it involves collaborative argumentation. Hence, argumentation researchers recommend that teachers use group argumentation to teach argumentative essays since Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory believed that group argumentation improves students’ writing skills. The study’s objective is to explore the use of group argumentation during the teaching of argumentative essays in English as a Second Language (ESL) classrooms in Malaysia. Hence, the involvement of practitioners is significant so that the full extent of the problem is known rather than being interpreted solely by researchers. This qualitative study was conducted on nine ESL teachers through convenience sampling. Data was collected through online interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings demonstrated that ESL teachers did not practice group argumentation when teaching argumentative essays. They resorted to the whole-class discussion instead. Five factors contribute to the negligence of group argumentation in ESL classrooms, that is, time, pressure to deliver curriculum, students’ attitude, students’ speaking skills, and the use of the first language (L1). The findings indicated that it is necessary to promote the teaching of argumentative essay writing using group argumentation as one of the teaching approaches in secondary schools to ensure students reap the benefits of collaborative learning to improve their argumentation skills.

The limitations of conducting collaborative argumentation when teaching argumentative essays in Malaysian secondary schools Aireen Aina Bahari; Haddi Junaidi Kussin; Raja Nor Safinas Raja Harun; Misrah Mohamed; Norfaizah Abdul Jobar
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 8, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v8i3.19287

The writing of argumentative essays promotes higher-order thinking skills amongst students regardless of their level of studying only when it involves collaborative argumentation. Hence, argumentation researchers recommend that teachers use group argumentation to teach argumentative essays since Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory believed that group argumentation improves students’ writing skills. The study’s objective is to explore the use of group argumentation during the teaching of argumentative essays in English as a Second Language (ESL) classrooms in Malaysia. Hence, the involvement of practitioners is significant so that the full extent of the problem is known rather than being interpreted solely by researchers. This qualitative study was conducted on nine ESL teachers through convenience sampling. Data was collected through online interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings demonstrated that ESL teachers did not practice group argumentation when teaching argumentative essays. They resorted to the whole-class discussion instead. Five factors contribute to the negligence of group argumentation in ESL classrooms, that is, time, pressure to deliver curriculum, students’ attitude, students’ speaking skills, and the use of the first language (L1). The findings indicated that it is necessary to promote the teaching of argumentative essay writing using group argumentation as one of the teaching approaches in secondary schools to ensure students reap the benefits of collaborative learning to improve their argumentation skills.

Exploring corpus linguistics via computational tool analysis: key finding review Wan Nur Aida Sakinah Wan Jusoh; Norfaizah Abdul Jobar; Md Zahril Nizam Md Yusoff; Hanifah Mahat
Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Vol 34, No 2: May 2024
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v34.i2.pp1052-1062

Corpus linguistics investigates language using extensive text databases. Tools assist researchers in analyzing, extracting, and interpreting linguistic information efficiently. Furthermore, if researchers only use traditional tools in corpus linguistic analysis, they will lack the comprehensiveness and efficiency required to effectively navigate and derive valuable insights from language data. This paper employed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) approach to find the primary data based on a few keywords in corpus linguistic, corpus analysis, computational linguistic, text corpora and tool support. Based on this method, we used advanced searching techniques on Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) and discovered (N=28) data pertinent to the study. Expert scholars decide on a theme based on the problem, which is (i) types of corpus tools and their uses; (ii) their contributions and their capabilities (iii) limitations of corpus tools. All the tools were used in interdisciplinary studies. In summary, this systematic review uncovers pivotal key findings at the intersection of computational tools and corpus analysis, enriching linguistic knowledge. It highlights the interdisciplinary potential of corpus-based analysis in advancing linguistic tools and, their applications, as well as language analysis.

Integration in reading literacy: a systematic review of pedagogical, professional, and engagement approaches Md Zahril Nizam Md Yusoff; Wan Nur Aida Sakinah Wan Jusoh; Norfaizah Abdul Jobar; Noor Zuhidayah Muhd Zulkipli; Muhamad Fadzllah Zaini; Tajul Shuhaizam Said
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Vol 15, No 1: February 2026
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v15i1.34044

This systematic literature review (SLR) following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 who explores integrated approaches to reading literacy across pedagogical integration, teacher development, and student engagement. From 1,108 retrieved articles, 59 article high-quality studies were selected for in-depth synthesis. Based on all studies published between 2020 and 2024, the findings reveal that multimodal instruction, inclusive pedagogy, and proposes a cohesive framework linking instructional innovation, teacher agency, and learner experience, offering actionable insights for educators and policymakers. The analysis identified three key thematic drivers of literacy improvement. First, integrated pedagogical practices such as multimodal, bilingual, and play-based instruction enhance literacy by making learning more inclusive, interactive, and context-responsive. Second, teacher professional development through targeted training in visual literacy, inclusive pedagogy, and digital tools strengthens instructional quality and prepares educators for evolving literacy demands. These approaches reflect current trends in instructional innovation and professional capacity building. Third, student engagement is significantly elevated through identity-driven learning, project-based tasks, and emotionally supportive environments that foster confidence, motivation, and deeper literacy outcomes. Together, these themes forms a new integration model that links teaching practices, teacher agency, and student experience into a cohesive literacy framework. The findings offer practical, evidence-based insights for policymakers, curriculum designers, and practitioners aiming to improve reading literacy across diverse settings.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search