Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin
Andi Rahman
Institut PTIQ Jakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Hadis dan Politik Sektarian: Analisis Basis Argumentasi tentang Konsep Imamah Menurut Shi‘ah Andi Rahman
JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Vol 2, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Qur'an and Hadith Academic Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (183.243 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/quhas.v2i1.1310

Abstract

This article discusses and analyzes the basic reading and argumentation of the Shi‘ite over the issue of political leadership in Islam, compared with that existing in the Sunnite conception. It discusses their argumentation based on their textual and contextual understanding of the Qur’an and Hadith. Sunnites and Shi‘ites have different opinion over whether Islamic leadership are set based on appointment (imamah) or election (khilafah).
Penggunaan Metode Content Analysis dalam Penelitian Hadis Andi Rahman
JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Vol 3, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Qur'an and Hadith Academic Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (196.343 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/quhas.v3i1.1165

Abstract

To determine the authenticity of hadith, we need to analyze its chain of transmission and its content. The analysis of the chain of transmission is conducted through the data collection in the literature of tarajum al-ruwat, by analyzing the concept used in sanad criticism. Among the critique of hadith, some scholars used a concept generally used by others, but they understand it differently. Others use special concept not usually used by others, without explaining what they mean by that concept. There are also others who explain the biography of the hadith transmitters, without explaining their qualities,  Al-Bukhari (d. 265 H) is among the ciritique of hadith who use these three concepts. This article, using content analysis methodology, tries to analyze and understand these three concepts.
Asinominitas Dalam Pembacaan Kritis Atas Buku Al-Kitāb Wa Al-Qur`ān Qirā`AH Mu’āṣirah Karya M. Syaḥrūr Andi Rahman
ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/esensia.v17i2.1290

Abstract

Muhammad Syaḥrūr is one of the Islamic thinkers who introduces a new accounts related to the study of Qur’anic exegesis. By using historical and scientific approaches, he refuses the idea of sinonymity (tarāduf) in the Qur’an. For him, there is a substantial difference between “nabi” and “rasūl”, as well as other terms such as “al-kitāb, al-Qur’ān, al-ẓikr, and al-Furqān”. Based on his rejection to this idea, Syaḥrūr constructs his own theories concerning Qur’anic interpretation. There are several books that represent the anti-thesis to the Syaḥrūr’s ideas. This article tries to formulate its synthesis. With reference to the classic linguistic literatures, the author proves that the Qur’an contains the synonymities, and it apparently weakens the Syaḥrūr’s argumentation.[Muhammad Syaḥrūr merupakan salah satu pemikir kontemporer yang memperkenalkan wacana baru terkait penafsiran al-Quran. Dengan menggunakan metode historis-ilmiah (tārīkh-‘ilmi), ia menyatakan penolakan terhadap sinominitas (tarāduf) dalam al-Quran. Baginya, ada perbedaan substansial antara ”nabi” dan “rasul”, sebagaimana perbedaan ini ada pada term “al-kitāb, al-Qur’ān, al-ẓikr, and al-Furqān”. Berdasarkan penolakannya terhadap sinomintas, Shahrur membangun teori-teori penafsirannya. Ada beberapa buku yang memuat antitesa terhadap teori yang diperkenalkan oleh Syaḥrūr. Artikel ini mencoba merumuskan sintesanya. Dengan merujuk kepada literatur linguistik klasik, penulis membuktikan bahwa sinonimitas ada dalam al-Quran, dan wacana yang disampaikan oleh Syaḥrūr menjadi lemah argumentasinya.]
Co-Authors