Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF INDEPENDENCE AND PROFESSIONALISM OF INDONESIAN ULEMA COUNCIL TOWARDS HALAL GUARANTEE CERTIFICATION ON PROCESSED FOOD INDUSTRY IN WEST JAVA Neng Yani Nurhayani; Sarip Muslim
International Journal of Nusantara Islam Vol 7, No 1 (2019): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijni.v7i1.4370

This study aims to analyze the mechanism of Halal Guarantee Certification publication in the food processing industry in West Java; and the application of the principle of independence and professionalism of The Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) in awarding Halal Guarantee Certification for processed food industries in West Java. Additionally, this study is a field research using a qualitative approach. The mechanism of awarding Halal Guarantee Certification begins with the company stating written objectives of the certification's implementation for the company regarding the rules outlined by The Research Institution on Food, Drug, and Cosmetics (LPPOM) and explaining the scope of application of guarantee systems in the corporate environment; begun with purchasing, receiving materials, production lines, storage of materials and products, transportation and distribution, as well as food displaying and serving (for restaurants to be assessed by LPPOM). The independence aspect is not only identified through being independent at organizing an institution; moreover, the careful consideration of expertise, field data, and also appearance must be the main indicators. The application of the professionalism principle, by The Indonesian Ulema Council in awarding Halal Guarantee Certification for the processed food industries in West Java, can be indicated through the method of assessing processed food industry products. As the result, The Ulema Council has been able to carry out excellent and appropriate coordination by giving this role to LPPOM.

ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF INDEPENDENCE AND PROFESSIONALISM OF INDONESIAN ULEMA COUNCIL TOWARDS HALAL GUARANTEE CERTIFICATION ON PROCESSED FOOD INDUSTRY IN WEST JAVA Neng Yani Nurhayani; Sarip Muslim
International Journal of Nusantara Islam Vol 7, No 1 (2019): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijni.v7i1.4370

This study aims to analyze the mechanism of Halal Guarantee Certification publication in the food processing industry in West Java; and the application of the principle of independence and professionalism of The Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) in awarding Halal Guarantee Certification for processed food industries in West Java. Additionally, this study is a field research using a qualitative approach. The mechanism of awarding Halal Guarantee Certification begins with the company stating written objectives of the certification's implementation for the company regarding the rules outlined by The Research Institution on Food, Drug, and Cosmetics (LPPOM) and explaining the scope of application of guarantee systems in the corporate environment; begun with purchasing, receiving materials, production lines, storage of materials and products, transportation and distribution, as well as food displaying and serving (for restaurants to be assessed by LPPOM). The independence aspect is not only identified through being independent at organizing an institution; moreover, the careful consideration of expertise, field data, and also appearance must be the main indicators. The application of the professionalism principle, by The Indonesian Ulema Council in awarding Halal Guarantee Certification for the processed food industries in West Java, can be indicated through the method of assessing processed food industry products. As the result, The Ulema Council has been able to carry out excellent and appropriate coordination by giving this role to LPPOM.

Epistemological Parallels and Divergences: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Maxims and Fiqhiyyah Rules and Their Implications for Contemporary Jurisprudence Raden Rara Rita Erawati; Neng Yani Nurhayani; Erika Rishan Adillah
Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jis.v6i2.52725

This study aims to analyze the similarities and differences between legal maxims in the Western legal tradition and Islamic legal maxims from a comparative epistemological perspective. Using a qualitative literature study approach, the study explores the conceptual structure, sources, hierarchy, and theological, sociological, and juridical dimensions of both legal maxim systems. The results show that both serve as guidelines for legal reasoning and decision-making, providing a normative framework that guides consistency, fairness, and flexibility in legal practice. However, there are fundamental differences in their legitimacy and scope of application. Islamic maxims have a strong theological foundation, derived from the Qur'an, hadith, ijtihad, and scholarly consensus, and are structured in a systematic hierarchy from universal principles to applicable rules. These maxims also integrate vertical (human relations with God) and horizontal (human relations among humans) dimensions, thus creating a holistic and welfare-oriented legal approach. In contrast, legal maxims develop through jurisprudential practice and precedent, are more flexible, pragmatic, and focus on legal certainty and procedural justice in social interactions. This comparative analysis not only demonstrates functional similarities and normative objectives but also highlights the potential for epistemological integration between the two legal traditions. The research findings provide an important contribution to contemporary legal development, particularly in countries with pluralistic legal systems like Indonesia, where dialogue between Islamic and Western law can enrich national legal methodology, support the formation of adaptive, contextual, and equitable regulations, and equip practitioners and academics with more comprehensive insights.

Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Review of Government Policy on the Free Nutritional Meal Program (MBG): A Comparative Study in Uṣūl al-Fiqh Neng Yani Nurhayani; RR. Rita Erawati; Erika Rishan Adillah; Ending Solehudin; Syahrul Anwar
Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jis.v6i3.55940

This study examines the alignment of Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals (MBG) policy with the principles of Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah through a normative juridical and comparative uṣūl al-fiqh approach. Focusing on hifẓ al-nafs and hifẓ al-māl, it finds that although MBG supports the preservation of life, its technocratic implementation has yet to embody maqāṣid values comprehensively, particularly regarding distributive justice, prioritization of benefits across ḍarūriyyāt, ḥājiyyāt, and taḥsīniyyāt, and long-term social welfare. The study highlights gaps such as unequal distribution, budget constraints, and weak monitoring, and argues for more adaptive, welfare-oriented policy formulation that integrates both classical emphases on basic needs and contemporary concerns for structural justice and sustainable welfare.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search