Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Jurnal Thengkyang
Dedeng Dedeng
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi Dedeng Dedeng
Simbur Cahaya VOLUME 25 NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 2018
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (146.991 KB) | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v25i2.329

Abstract

The Constitutional Court as an Indonesian state institution in the judicial review of the law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has been regulated by Law Number 24 Year 2003. Testing the Act against the Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 to produce an amar decision of the Constitutional Court in practice should still refer to the provisions of the Constitutional Court Law is Article 56 of the Constitutional Court Law. The research method used is prescriptive legal research, with the approach of legislation, case approach and historical approach. The types and sources of legal materials include primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of drawing conclusions using deductive thinking logic is the way of thinking of general statements drawn conclusions that are specific to obtain answers to the problems to be discussed in this journal thesis.Based on the result of the research, the decision of the Constitutional Court namely the ruling declared the request is unacceptable, the verdict states the petition is granted, the verdict says the petition is granted, and the verdict declares that the verdict is rejected. The result of the research about the ruling in practice in the process of examining the law against the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia in the Constitutional Court is based on the results of the study of the 2016, 2017 and 2018 decisions are varying rulings namely the decision of the Constitutional Court which states to grant partial, denied part of it, declared void, declared unauthorized, declared the interlocutory / provisional, declared withdrawn, refused entirely, granted whole and unacceptable. The decision of the Constitutional Court should be the ruling that has been regulated in accordance with Article 56 of Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding the Constitutional Court. Institutions of the Constitutional Court on the verdict should still refer to the provisions of the ruling as stipulated and regulated in the Law of the Constitutional Court itself. The House of Representatives (DPR) body needs to supplement the provisions of Article 56 of Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding the Constitutional Court as amended into Law Number 8 Year 2011 regarding the amendment of Law Number 24 Year 2003 The government or the President needs to support the fulfillment of the legal basis to accommodate the varied decisions of the Constitutional Court.
PENGATURAN DAN PELAKSANAAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP IUU FISHING DALAM PENGUATAN SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL adm-jurnal adm-jurnal; dedeng dedeng
Jurnal Tengkhiang Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Edisi Juni 2019 Jurnal Thengkyang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sjakhyakirti Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia memiliki 17.504 pulau dan luas perairan laut 5, 8 juta km², terdiri dari luas laut teritorial 0,3 juta km2, luas perairan kepulauan 2,95 juta km², dan luas ZEE Indonesia 2,55 juta km2. Potensi lestari sumberdaya ikan laut Indonesia diperkirakan sebesar 7,3 juta ton per tahun. Salah satu masalah dalam sektor perikanan perikanan Indonesia adalah banyak terjadi IUU Fishing di wilayah perairan Indonesia oleh kapal nelayan asing. Kondisi seperti ini, menjadikan upaya pencegahan dan penanggulangan kegiatan IUU Fishing sangat signifikan. Permasalahan terkait IUU Fishing di Indonesia berkenaan dengan: pengaturan mengenai pencegahan dan penanggulangan IUU Fishing, pelaksanaan penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku IUU Fishing, dan kerjasama antar negara dalam pencegahan dan penanggulangan IUU Fishing.Berdasarkan temuan, terdapat tidak kurang 13 peraturan perundang-undangan, mulai tingkat undang-undang hingga peraturan menteri Keluatan dan Perikanan yang mengatur masalah IUU Fishing di Indonesia. Dua penegakan hukum, yaitu Sistem Peradilan Tindak Pidana Perikanan, dan Satuan Tugas Pemberantasan Penangkapan Ikan Secara Ilegal (Illegal Fishing) atau Satgas 115. Kerjasama bilateral, terbatas pada tingkat MOU atau Joint Communique. Tingkat ASEAN belum dicapai suatu perjanjian regional, yang lebih maju adalah kerjasama dalam bentuk keikutsertaan Indonesa dalam IOTC, CCSBT dan WCPFC. Sebab itu, dalam memperkuat sistem hukum nasional harus terus memperbarui perundang-undangan, mengalakan kerjasama dengan negara-negara tetangga dan dalam kerangka ASEAN.
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi Dedeng Dedeng
Simbur Cahaya VOLUME 25 NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 2018
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v25i2.329

Abstract

The Constitutional Court as an Indonesian state institution in the judicial review of the law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has been regulated by Law Number 24 Year 2003. Testing the Act against the Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 to produce an amar decision of the Constitutional Court in practice should still refer to the provisions of the Constitutional Court Law is Article 56 of the Constitutional Court Law. The research method used is prescriptive legal research, with the approach of legislation, case approach and historical approach. The types and sources of legal materials include primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of drawing conclusions using deductive thinking logic is the way of thinking of general statements drawn conclusions that are specific to obtain answers to the problems to be discussed in this journal thesis.Based on the result of the research, the decision of the Constitutional Court namely the ruling declared the request is unacceptable, the verdict states the petition is granted, the verdict says the petition is granted, and the verdict declares that the verdict is rejected. The result of the research about the ruling in practice in the process of examining the law against the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia in the Constitutional Court is based on the results of the study of the 2016, 2017 and 2018 decisions are varying rulings namely the decision of the Constitutional Court which states to grant partial, denied part of it, declared void, declared unauthorized, declared the interlocutory / provisional, declared withdrawn, refused entirely, granted whole and unacceptable. The decision of the Constitutional Court should be the ruling that has been regulated in accordance with Article 56 of Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding the Constitutional Court. Institutions of the Constitutional Court on the verdict should still refer to the provisions of the ruling as stipulated and regulated in the Law of the Constitutional Court itself. The House of Representatives (DPR) body needs to supplement the provisions of Article 56 of Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding the Constitutional Court as amended into Law Number 8 Year 2011 regarding the amendment of Law Number 24 Year 2003 The government or the President needs to support the fulfillment of the legal basis to accommodate the varied decisions of the Constitutional Court.
Co-Authors adm-jurnal adm-jurnal