Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KONSTITUSIONALITAS PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA ADMINISTRASI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF REGULATING ADMINISTRATIVE PENAL LAW Humam Balya; Umar Mubdi
TAFAQQUH: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dan Ahwal Syahsiyah Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): Desember
Publisher : LP2M Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Darul Falah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan merumuskan parameter konstitusional politik kriminal dalam pengaturan tindak pidana administrasi berdasarkan putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi mengenai pengujian ketentuan pidana dalam undang-undang. Pasalnya, diperlukan ukuran tertentu agar sanksi pidana dapat digunakan secara selektif dan terukur. Penulisan hukum ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif. Dengan data sekunder berupa sumber hukum primer yakni putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, peraturan perundang-undangan, serta sumber hukum sekunder berupa buku, jurnal, dan artikel ilmiah. Kemudian data yang didapat dianalisis secara deskriptif (analitik)-kualitatif. Dari penulisan hukum ini diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa, politik kriminal dalam pengaturan tindak pidana administrasi menurut Mahkamah meliputi aspek penentuan perbuatan pidana (kriminalisasi) dan ancaman pidana (penalisasi). Adapun argumentasi-argumentasi Mahkamah sebagai parameter yang berkaitan antara lain mengenai (i) kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum, (ii) perlindungan masyarakat, (iii) overcriminalization, (iv) hukum pidana sebagai ultimum remedium dan memperhatikan eksistensi hukum lainnya, (v) ketentuan konstitusional adresat, (vi) teknis perumusan norma, dan (vii) disparitas sanksi pidana dalam tindak pidana administrasi
FILSAFAT HUKUM, IDEOLOGI DAN MASYARAKAT (Perspektif Marxisme dan Islam) Humam Balya; Muhammad Said
AL-RASYAD: JURNAL HUKUM DAN ETIKA BISNIS SYARIAH Vol. 3 No. 01 (2024): JURNAL AL-RASYAD
Publisher : Prodi. Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah, IAI Hamzanwadi Pancor Lombok Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research digs a comparison of legal philosophical perspectives between Marxism and Islam. The main focus is to analyze the views of both in relation to the concepts of law, justice, and its role in society. In the context of Marxism, the study deals with Marx's views and critical thinking of the capitalist legal system, as well as efforts to create a more just socialist society. On the other hand, it also explores the Islamic view of law, based on principles of Sariah, social justice, and Islamic rule. The study aims to understand the similarities, differences, and potential collaboration between Marxism and Islam in formulating legal solutions relevant to contemporary social and economic challenges. The method of analysis is used as an overview in the analysis and interpretation of key texts related to Marxism and Islam in the context of Marx's legal philosophy and works, other Marxist thought, as well as classical and contemporary texts in Islamic thought, especially those related to law, justice, and government. This paper also uses methods of comparative analysis to compare the legal systems influenced by Marxism and Islam. For example, on the concept of law, justice, and its role in society. The results of the study show that there is a comparison of legal concepts, especially in defining the law, the sources of law, and the purpose of law. Both, can play a role in the formation of the legal system in a State. For example, the principles of Marxism or Islam influence laws, policies, or legal decisions, and there are social and political implications of the application of principles in the context of the law. This could include its impact on political stability, social well-being, or individual rights.