Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Conference In Business, Accounting And Management (Cbam) 2012
Hasna Penta Kurnia
Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University
Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
The Influence Of Fundamental Factors To Liquidity Risk On Banking Industry: Comparative Study between Islamic Bank and Conventional Bank In Indonesia Harjum Muharam; Hasna Penta Kurnia
Conference In Business, Accounting, And Management (CBAM) Vol 1, No 2 (2012): Conference In Business, Accounting And Management (Cbam) 2012
Publisher : Conference In Business, Accounting, And Management (CBAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Bank and risk are two things that cannot be separated from each other. Both conventional and Islamic banks are more or less similar in risk summary. One of the critical risk is liquidity risk that caused by bank disabilities on meeting their maturity dates of depositors. Therefore it needs further observations to control their liquidity risk. This study investigates the influence of CAR, profitability ratios, NIM, liquidity gaps, and RLA belongs to liquidity risk on banking industry. The population of this study consists of conventional and Islamic banks. The selection of samples uses purposive sampling method. The samples are divided into 3 conventional banks and 3 Islamic banks. The study is based on secondary data in a period of five years, i.e. 2007-2011. The statistical analysis of secondary data has been divided into three, which are descriptive, regressionand hypothesis testing. The study finds negative and significant influence of CAR and ROE to liquidity risk on conventional banks, while ROA and RLA have positive and insignificant effect. In Islamic banks, the research finds positive and significant impact of NIM and ROE to dependent variable, whereas liquidity gaps and RLA have insignificant affect. Liquidity gaps have positive and significant effect to liquidity risk in conventional banks, while ROA has positive direction in Islamic banks. In addition, NIM in first model and CAR in second model is found to be negative and insignificant at 5% significance level.Keywords: conventional banks, Islamic banks, liquidity risk, fundamental factors
Co-Authors Harjum Muharam