Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Jurnal Konstitusi Constitutional Review Jurnal Konstitusi
Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (906.658 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk731

Abstract

This article is about settlement disputes of authorities of state institutions by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. Pursuant to Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution in conjunction with Article 10 Paragraph (1) of the Constitutional Court Law, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia has the authority to hear at the first and final level, the decision of which shall be final, among others in deciding disputes of authorities of state institutions, the authorities of which are granted by  the Constitution. But, the 1945 Constitution and the Constitutional Court Law not provide enough rules for the Constitutional Court to decide the case, especially about objectum litis and subjectum litis.In the Decision Number 004/SKLNIV/2006  dated  July  12,  2006  the Constitutional Court using gramatical interpretation (grammatische interpretatie) and declare that to decide upon disputes on authority granted by 1945 Constitution, the first thing to consider is the existence  of certain authorities in the Constitution and then to which institutions those authorities are given. Constitutional authority not just textually specified in the 1945 Constitution, but also implicit authority derived from the principal authority, and necessary and proper authority to exercise the principal authority.Related to that, classification of state institutions can be based on the form of power/authority given to the state institution.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (906.658 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk731

Abstract

This article is about settlement disputes of authorities of state institutions by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. Pursuant to Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution in conjunction with Article 10 Paragraph (1) of the Constitutional Court Law, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia has the authority to hear at the first and final level, the decision of which shall be final, among others in deciding disputes of authorities of state institutions, the authorities of which are granted by  the Constitution. But, the 1945 Constitution and the Constitutional Court Law not provide enough rules for the Constitutional Court to decide the case, especially about objectum litis and subjectum litis.In the Decision Number 004/SKLNIV/2006  dated  July  12,  2006  the Constitutional Court using gramatical interpretation (grammatische interpretatie) and declare that to decide upon disputes on authority granted by 1945 Constitution, the first thing to consider is the existence  of certain authorities in the Constitution and then to which institutions those authorities are given. Constitutional authority not just textually specified in the 1945 Constitution, but also implicit authority derived from the principal authority, and necessary and proper authority to exercise the principal authority.Related to that, classification of state institutions can be based on the form of power/authority given to the state institution.
PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 140/PUU-VII/2009 DAN JAMINAN KONSTITUSIONAL ISLAM NUSANTARA Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo
Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 15 No 2 (2015): Analisis : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/ajsk.v15i2.728

Abstract

The Constitutional Court  Decision  Number  140/PUU-VII/2009 regarding  the case of judicial  review of Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 about   the   Prevention   of  Abuse   and/or   blasphemy   is   very important  for the study  of the development  of religious  life in Indonesia,  especially  for the  study  of “Islam  Nusantara”.  This paper will describe ebates  in the trial  to assessed the extent  to which the views of the majority  of the people related  with  the norms of the Law. In addition, this paper also will be describe the Constitutional Court’s  decision  on the  petition.  After  that,  the authors examine the relationship between the Constitutional Court decision and the existence of “Islam Nusantara”  in Indonesia. In conclusion, the Constitutional Court through Decision No. 140/ PUU-VII/2009  provided constitutional guarantees  on  religious practices like “Islam Nusantara”.
Co-Authors