Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law
Wira Purwadi
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Productive Zakat Empowerment by Baznas in Improvement of Mustahiq’s Economy in Kotamobagu Edi Gunawan; Sahari Sahari; Deden Afandi; Wira Purwadi
Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Vol. 5, No. 1, Oktober 2021
Publisher : Sultang Agung Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jua.v5i1.17862

Abstract

Zakat instrument plays an important role in religious scope. Zakat in Islamic principle, besides serving as a spiritually mandatory form of worship, can also be an alternativein poverty eradication process. Optimal zakat management and empowerment are needed for zakat to serve not only to perform worship spiritually but also as an instrument to eradicate poverty in the community, especially for Muslims. Improved understanding of the benefits of zakat both for muzzakiand mustahiqis very important. Zakat fund will not be spent only for consumption but can also be empowered for a productive business. Thus zakat is expected to change mustahiq’squality of life for betterment.
PUTUSAN KONSTITUSIONAL DEMOKRATIS TERHADAP SENGKETA PEMILU SERENTAK MENURUT FIQIH SIYASAH Wira Purwadi; Edi Gunawan; Devi Restiani Susilo; Johana Manuhuwa
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022): Al-Mizan (e-Journal)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/am.v18i2.2058

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is a judicial institution that has the authority to resolve disputes over general election results. The purpose of this study is to analyze the challenges of the Constitutional Court in producing democratic constitutional decisions on 2024 simultaneous election disputes and to analyze its authority in producing democratic constitutional decisions on 2024 simultaneous election disputes from the perspective of Islamic constitutional law (fiqh siyasah). This type of research is a combination of normative research and empirical law. The results of the research show that the Constitutional Court faces several challenges in the 2024 Simultaneous Elections, namely: readiness to provide optimal service, intense political pressure for the presidential election, time issues and quality of decisions. The decision of the Constitutional Court must truly reflect a fair and just decision within the framework of implementing constitutional democracy. In the perspective of fiqh siyasah, the decisions of the judges of the Constitutional Court must provide a sense of justice for the people, and this is implemented if the constitutional judges have statesmanship, prioritize substantive justice, not become mouthpieces for the law, so that the decisions of the Constitutional Court must uphold constitutional democratic values based on justice. in the name of God Almighty.
Child Protection and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah in Indonesian Marriage Dispensation Decisions Firmansyah Pratama Alim; Gizca Mokodongan; Wira Purwadi; Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Mohammed Zabidi
Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 6, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/ajifl.v6i1.4207

Abstract

Child marriage remains a persistent challenge in Indonesia despite the statutory increase of the minimum marriage age to 19. The marriage dispensation mechanism, while designed as a limited legal exception, often becomes a pathway through which underage marriage is judicially authorized. This study examines how judges construct considerations of child protection and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah in Indonesian marriage dispensation decisions by comparing Decision No. 51/Pdt.P/2021/PN.Arm of the Airmadidi District Court and Decision No. 81/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Bit of the Bitung Religious Court. Using an empirical juridical method with a qualitative comparative approach, the study analyzes court decisions, relevant legislation, and interview data from judicial actors. The findings show that both courts granted dispensation but relied on different legal rationalities. The Airmadidi District Court emphasized factual urgency, cohabitation, reproductive health risks, educational disruption, economic readiness, and the best interests of the child. The Bitung Religious Court, while also applying statutory rules, framed urgency through Islamic legal reasoning, particularly the prevention of zina and the protection of lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasl). This study argues that marriage dispensation should not be treated merely as an emergency measure but as a child-protection test that requires a careful balance among maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, legal certainty, and children’s long-term welfare.
Co-Authors Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Mohammed Zabidi Deden Afandi Devi Restiani Susilo Edi Gunawan Firmansyah Pratama Alim Gizca Mokodongan Johana Manuhuwa Naskur Bilalu Sahari Sahari Syahrul Mubarak Subeitan