Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Ahmad Rifqi Muchtar
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Access to Justice for Women and Children in Divorce Cases in the Indonesian Religious Courts Hotnidah Nasution; Ahmad Rifqi Muchtar
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 20, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v20i2.15702

Abstract

This research aims to investigate access to justice for children and women in the Religious Court Decisions after the issuance of Circular Letter of Supreme Court No. 4 of 2016, Point 5 on Religious Chamber. This particular point states that the Religious Court can require a father to provide child maintenance if the child is under the custody of the mother. This is a normative study, with the data obtained from interviews and 150 Religious court decisions. These decisions are issued by the Religious Courts of East Jakarta and Central Jakarta from 2015-2017. The examination of those Decisions reveals that most of the decisions on divorce do not mention any stipulation about child maintenance. This means that the Supreme Court Circular No. 4 of 2016 has not been able to protect children rights in the case of divorce, as well as women’s rights. From the court used in this study, only 14% that require the fathers to provide child maintenance after divorce. This percentage is almost similar to the decisions issued before the issuance of the Circular, which only 12% in 2016, and 14% in 2017.     AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akses keadilan bagi anak dan perempuan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama pasca terbitnya Keputusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 Poin 5 tentang Kamar Beragama. Dalam poin khusus ini disebutkan bahwa Pengadilan Agama dapat meminta seorang ayah untuk mengasuh anak jika anak tersebut berada di bawah asuhan ibunya. Penelitian ini bersifat normatif, dengan data diperoleh dari wawancara dan 150 putusan Pengadilan Agama. Putusan-putusan tersebut dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Timur dan Jakarta Pusat dari tahun 2015- 2017. Berdasarkan pemeriksaan terhadap Putusan tersebut, sebagian besar Putusan perceraian tidak menyebutkan ketentuan tentang pengasuhan anak. Artinya, Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 belum mampu melindungi hak anak dan hal perempuan dalam kasus perceraian. Data pengadilan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini, menyebutkan hanya 14% yang mewajibkan ayah untuk mengasuh anak setelah perceraian. Persentase ini hampir sama dengan keputusan yang dikeluarkan sebelum keluarnya keputusan tersebut, yaitu hanya 12% pada 2016, dan 14% pada 2017.
CIVILIZATIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: A RESPONSE TO THE LOGICAL FALLACIES OF THE JURISPRUDENCE IDEOLOGY NARRATIVES OF ANTI-PANCASILA ORGANIZATIONS ON SOCIAL MEDIA Ahmad Rifqi Muchtar; Ali Wafa'
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 14 No 4 (2025): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6659

Abstract

This research responds to the growing movement among certain Islamic mass organizations (Ormas) in Indonesia that continue to challenge the legitimacy of Pancasila as the state ideology by using the framework of civilization jurisprudence (fikih peradaban). These groups argue that Pancasila does not sufficiently accommodate Islamic law (syariah), which they claim should be prioritized as the legal foundation for a Muslim-majority nation. To critically examine these claims, this study employs content analysis to uncover the logical fallacies embedded within the ideological narratives produced by these Ormas. Primary data consist of written and digital narratives from organizations such as Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI), the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI), Jama'ah Ansharut Daulah (JAD), and Jama'ah Islamiyah—groups known to have transnational ideological affiliations, including links to ISIS. These narratives are sourced from official websites, organizational documents (such as constitutions and bylaws), and social media postings. Secondary data include reports from the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Religious Affairs, as well as authoritative Islamic scholarly sources such as classical fiqh, usul fiqh, tafsir ahkam, academic journals, and credible news articles. The analysis reveals that the discourse promoted by these transnational Islamic groups frames Pancasila and the Quran as mutually exclusive, leading to an erroneous ideological dichotomy. Their reasoning is shown to be fallacious due to inappropriate comparisons, overgeneralizations, and the failure to understand the distinct epistemic categories between divine revelation and a contextual national ideology. The study concludes that fikih peradaban offers a constructive paradigm for harmonizing religious and national commitments, affirming that Indonesian law is inherently dynamic, contextual, and capable of integrating universal Islamic values without undermining Pancasila.
Co-Authors Ali Wafa' Hotnidah Nasution