Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tugas-tugas professional dan non professional pustakawan dl bidang administrasi Maman Rahman
Al Maktabah Vol 3, No 1 (2001)
Publisher : Pusat Perpustakaan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (652.177 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/almaktabah.v3i1.1704

Abstract

Berdasarkan sifatnya, pekerjaan pustakwan terbagi atas pekerjaan yang bersifat teknis dan pekerjaan yang bersifat analisis. Sedangkan berdasarkan jabatan fungsinya pustakwan dibedakan antara Asisten Pustakawan dan Pustakawan. Selain itu berdasarkan uraian atau rincian tugasnya, tugas pustakawan dibedakan atas tugas-tugas professional dan tugas-tugas non professional. Sebagai tugas professional seorang pustakawan harus memenuhi syarat-syarat yang ditentukan sebagai seorang yang menyandang jabatan atau pekerjaan profesional dalam hal pendidikan dan keterampilan, motivasi kerja, kode etik jabatan, asosiasi profesi dan jiwa mandiri.Kata Kunci: professional, non professional, pustakawan, administrasi
THE APPLICATION OF JIGSAW TYPE OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL IN MATHEMATICS SUBJECT TO INCREASE STUDENTS' LEARNING OUTCOMES Maman Rahman; Dahlan Dahlan
JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) Vol 7, No 2 (2021): JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar)
Publisher : Department of Primary education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Su

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30870/jpsd.v7i2.11477

Abstract

Abstract The background of this research is from the results of initial observations which show that the children only listen, take notes, memorize, and students are not active to be able to find their own concepts, so it resulting in low learning outcomes. With that background, the researchers took the initiative to make improvements using the Jigsaw-Type Cooperative method. The result of this classroom action research, obtain that: 1) Students' learning outcomes in mathematics subjects before using jigsaw cooperative learning in the teaching materials of addition and subtraction of fractions are still very low. This is proved by the average score of students' learning outcomes that is only 51.75 (below the Minimum Completeness Criteria). Because the learning activities are monotonous which means that learning does not vary when delivering the subject material. Students' enthusiasm, interest, and activity decreased due to difficulties in working and solving the worksheets. 2) With applying jigsaw-type cooperative learning, students' activities in individual learning, group learning, learning enthusiasm, attention, collaboration, communication, and discipline, overall have shown well as expected. 3) After implementing jigsaw-type cooperative learning in mathematics learning, students' learning outcomes showed improvement. This is proven from the acquisition results of the first cycle average score is 60.75 and the average score in the second cycle reaches 75, above the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM) of 55. Keywords: Jigsaw; Mathematics; Learning OutcomesAbstract The background of this research is from the results of initial observations which show that the children only listen, take notes, memorize, and students are not active to be able to find their own concepts, so it resulting in low learning outcomes. With that background, the researchers took the initiative to make improvements using the Jigsaw-Type Cooperative method. The result of this classroom action research, obtain that: 1) Students' learning outcomes in mathematics subjects before using jigsaw cooperative learning in the teaching materials of addition and subtraction of fractions are still very low. This is proved by the average score of students' learning outcomes that is only 51.75 (below the Minimum Completeness Criteria). Because the learning activities are monotonous which means that learning does not vary when delivering the subject material. Students' enthusiasm, interest, and activity decreased due to difficulties in working and solving the worksheets. 2) With applying jigsaw-type cooperative learning, students' activities in individual learning, group learning, learning enthusiasm, attention, collaboration, communication, and discipline, overall have shown well as expected. 3) After implementing jigsaw-type cooperative learning in mathematics learning, students' learning outcomes showed improvement. This is proven from the acquisition results of the first cycle average score is 60.75 and the average score in the second cycle reaches 75, above the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM) of 55. Keywords: Jigsaw; Mathematics; Learning Outcomes