Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Typology of Sasaknese Muslim Scholars’ Views in Lombok toward the Hybrid Contract as a Problem-Solving in Islamic Finance Musawar Musawar
AL-FALAH : Journal of Islamic Economics Vol 3, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alfalah.v3i2.522

Abstract

This paper studies the views of Sasaknese Muslim Scholars toward the Hybrid Contract, in Lombok Island Indonesia in terms of their argumentations, typologies, and applications which becomes confusion in the society. The paper argues that problem in the transaction exists clearly. It is because of the limited meaning of Riba which is very strict that raises the society to fear to do the both in individual and group transactions since Riba have been prohibited by Al-Qur’an. While, the globalization of economic world rapidly runs which people must catch up with it. Then, related to the financial aspect of the Islamic teaching is tasted that it is running at its place. Hence, it needs to the solution. One of the solutions is applying Hybrid Contract in the view of TGH where they are very influential the life of society. Moreover, Lombok island is popularly known as thousands mosque island and soon as being seen from different references and facts. Consequently, for understanding the above phenomenon, the researcher used qualitative approach, juridical approach, and sociology by collecting data through observation, and interview to know typology Muslim scholars about hybrid contract by a hope to be the contributions for the government to take a policy. .
Bid'a in the Perspective of Islamic Theology and Law Musawar Musawar
Ulumuna Vol 23 No 1 (2019): June
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v23i1.348

Abstract

Bid’a, literally translated as religious heresy and innovation, has become a topic of controversy amongst Muslims. There are Prophetic traditions that address bid’a in the most critical term, declaring its perpetrators of misguided persons threatened by hellfire. This paper critically examines the notion of bid’a and conceptually analyzes it from the perspectives of Islamic theology and law. Based on textual analysis of this term as this is found in some Prophetic traditions and their interpretation by Muslim scholars, this paper shows that the meaning of bid’a covers various aspects of Islam, including theology and law. Muslims scholars understand the hadith on bid’a literally and contend that all innovations are misleading. Other scholars, however, suggest that based on their critical examination of the term from linguistic, contextual and practical aspects, not all bid’a are misguided. These scholars tend to comprehend bid’a from the perspective of Islam law rather than theology. According to Islamic law, human actions fall into five legal categories: compulsory, recommended, neutral, reprehensible and forbidden. Bid’a must be put into this perspective. In other words, not all new things and innovation are forbidden because they can be categorised as neutral or recommended, depending on the relevant legal considerations.